A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
The electroporation of primate cerebral organoids provides a precise and efficient approach to introduce transient genetic modification(s) into different progenitor types and neurons in a model system close to primate (patho)physiological neocortex development. This allows the study of neurodevelopmental and evolutionary processes and can also be applied for disease modeling.
The cerebral cortex is the outermost brain structure and is responsible for the processing of sensory input and motor output; it is seen as the seat of higher-order cognitive abilities in mammals, in particular, primates. Studying gene functions in primate brains is challenging due to technical and ethical reasons, but the establishment of the brain organoid technology has enabled the study of brain development in traditional primate models (e.g., rhesus macaque and common marmoset), as well as in previously experimentally inaccessible primate species (e.g., great apes), in an ethically justifiable and less technically demanding system. Moreover, human brain organoids allow the advanced investigation of neurodevelopmental and neurological disorders.
As brain organoids recapitulate many processes of brain development, they also represent a powerful tool to identify differences in, and to functionally compare, the genetic determinants underlying the brain development of various species in an evolutionary context. A great advantage of using organoids is the possibility to introduce genetic modifications, which permits the testing of gene functions. However, the introduction of such modifications is laborious and expensive. This paper describes a fast and cost-efficient approach to genetically modify cell populations within the ventricle-like structures of primate cerebral organoids, a subtype of brain organoids. This method combines a modified protocol for the reliable generation of cerebral organoids from human-, chimpanzee-, rhesus macaque-, and common marmoset-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with a microinjection and electroporation approach. This provides an effective tool for the study of neurodevelopmental and evolutionary processes that can also be applied for disease modeling.
Investigating the (patho)physiological development and evolution of the cerebral cortex is a formidable task that is hampered by the lack of suitable model systems. Previously, such studies were confined to two-dimensional cell culture models (such as primary neural progenitor or neuronal cell cultures) and evolutionarily distant animal models (such as rodents)1,2. While these models are useful for addressing certain questions, they are limited in modeling the complexity, cell type composition, cellular architecture, and gene expression patterns of the developing human neocortex in healthy and diseased states. These limitations lead, for example, to the poor translatability of mouse models of human diseases to the human situation, as described for certain cases of microcephaly (e.g., Zhang et al.3). Recently, transgenic non-human primates, which are an evolutionarily, functionally, and morphologically closer model of human neocortex development, have come into focus4,5,6,7,8 as they overcome many limitations of cell culture- and rodent-based models. However, the use of non-human primates in research is not only highly expensive and time-consuming but also raises ethical concerns. More recently, the development of brain organoid technology9,10 has emerged as a promising alternative that solves many of the limitations of previous models11,12,13,14,15,16.
Brain organoids are three-dimensional (3D), multicellular structures that emulate the main features of the cytoarchitecture and cell-type composition of one or multiple brain regions for a defined developmental time window11,12,13,14,17. These 3D structures are generated either from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or, if available for the species of interest, from embryonic stem cells (ESCs). In general, two types of brain organoids can be distinguished based on the methodology used: unguided and regionalized (guided) brain organoids18. In generating the latter type of organoids, small molecules or factors are provided that guide the differentiation of the pluripotent stem cells to organoids of a particular brain region (e.g., forebrain organoids)18. By contrast, in unguided organoids, the differentiation is not guided by the addition of small molecules but rather relies exclusively on the spontaneous differentiation of the iPSCs/ESCs. The resulting brain organoids consist of cell types representing different brain regions (e.g., cerebral organoids)18. Brain organoids combine many key features of brain development with relatively cost- and time-efficient generation from any species of interest for which iPSCs or ESCs are available11,12,13,14. This makes brain organoids an excellent model for many kinds of neurobiological studies, ranging from evolutionary and developmental questions to disease modeling and drug testing15,16. However, addressing such questions using brain organoids strongly depends on the availability of different methods for genetic modification.
One key aspect of studying neocortex (patho)physiological development and its evolution is the functional analysis of genes and gene variants. This is usually achieved by (ectopic) expression and/or by knock-down (KD) or knock-out (KO) of those genes. Such genetic modifications can be classified into stable and transient genetic modification, as well as into the modifications being temporally and spatially restricted or not restricted. Stable genetic modification is defined by the introduction of a genetic alteration into the host genome that is passed on to all subsequent cell generations. Depending on the time point of genetic modification, it can affect all the cells of an organoid or can be restricted to certain cell populations. Most frequently, stable genetic modification is achieved in brain organoids at the iPSC/ESC level by applying lentiviruses, transposon-like systems, and the CRISPR/Cas9 technology (reviewed by, e.g., Fischer et al.17, Kyrousi et al.19, and Teriyapirom et al.20). This has the advantage that all cells of the brain organoid carry the genetic modification and that it is not temporally or spatially restricted. However, the generation and characterization of these stable iPSC/ESC lines are very time-consuming, often taking several months until the first modified brain organoids can be analyzed (reviewed by e.g., Fischer et al.17, Kyrousi et al.19, or Teriyapirom et al.20).
In contrast, transient genetic modification is defined by the delivery of genetic cargo (e.g., a gene expression plasmid) that does not integrate into the host genome. While this modification can, in principle, be passed on to subsequent cell generations, the delivered genetic cargo will be progressively diluted with each cell division. Therefore, this type of genetic modification is usually temporally and spatially restricted. Transient genetic modification can be carried out in brain organoids by adeno-associated viruses or by electroporation (reviewed by, e.g., Fischer et al.17, Kyrousi et al.19, and Teriyapirom et al.20), with the latter being described in detail in this article. In contrast to stable genetic modification, this approach is very fast and cost-efficient. Indeed, electroporation can be performed within minutes, and, depending on the target cell population(s), electroporated organoids are ready for analysis within days (reviewed by, e.g., Fischer et al.17 and Kyrousi et al.19). However, gross morphological changes of the brain organoid, such as differences in size, cannot be detected using this method, as this type of genetic modification is temporally and spatially restricted. This restriction can also be an advantage, for example, in the case of studying individual cell populations within the organoid or the effects on brain organoids at specific developmental time points (reviewed by, e.g., Fischer et al.17 and Kyrousi et al.19).
A classical approach to study gene function during brain development and evolution is in utero electroporation. In utero electroporation is a well-known and useful technique for the delivery of gene expression constructs into rodent21,22,23 and ferret24,25 brains. First, a solution containing the expression construct(s) of interest is microinjected through the uterine wall into a certain ventricle of the embryonic brain, depending on the region to be targeted. In the second step, electric pulses are applied to transfect the cells directly lining the targeted ventricle. This approach is not only limited to ectopic expression or the overexpression of genes, as it can also be applied in KD or KO studies by microinjecting short hairpin (shRNA) or CRISPR/Cas9 (in the form of expression plasmids or ribonucleoproteins [RNPs]), respectively26,27. However, the in utero electroporation of mouse, rat, and ferret embryos has the same limitations as described above for these animal models.
Ideally, one would like to perform in utero electroporation directly in primates. While this is, in principle, technically possible, in utero electroporation is not conducted in primates due to ethical concerns, high animal maintenance costs, and small litter sizes. For certain primates, such as great apes (including humans), this is not possible at all. However, these primates have the greatest potential for the study of human (patho)physiological neocortex development and its evolution. One solution to this dilemma is to apply the electroporation technique to primate brain organoids28.
This paper presents a protocol for the electroporation of a subtype of primate brain organoids, primate cerebral organoids. This approach allows the fast and cost-efficient genetic modification of cell populations within the ventricle-like structures of the organoids. Specifically, we describe a unified protocol for the generation of primate cerebral organoids from human (Homo sapiens), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta), and common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) iPSCs. Moreover, we describe the microinjection and electroporation technique in detail and provide "go" and "no-go" criteria for performing primate cerebral organoid electroporation. This approach is an effective tool for studying (patho)physiological neocortex development and its evolution in a model especially close to the human situation.
1. Culture of primate iPSCs
NOTE: Due to its robustness, the method presented here can be applied to any primate iPSC line. In this article, we describe cerebral organoid production from human (iLonza2.2)29, chimpanzee (Sandra A)30, rhesus macaque (iRh33.1)29, and common marmoset (cj_160419_5)31 iPSC lines. The culture conditions are summarized in Table 1. See the Table of Materials for details related to all the materials, reagents, and equipment used in this protocol.
2. Generation of cerebral organoids from primate iPSCs
NOTE: The protocol for cerebral organoid generation is based on a modified version28,30,32,33 of the original cerebral organoid protocol10,34 with some species-specific modifications (detailed below).
3. Electroporation of primate cerebral organoids
NOTE: From a technical point of view, the electroporation of cerebral organoids can be conducted as soon as the ventricle-like structures are pronounced enough to be targeted by microinjection. The optimal electroporation time window depends on the biological question and on the cell population(s) of interest. For example, if apical progenitors (APs) are the main target, then cerebral organoids at around 30 dps are already suitable. If basal progenitors (BPs) or neurons are the main targets, older cerebral organoids of more than 50 dps should be used (see, for example, Fischer et al.28).
The protocol described here allows the efficient generation of cerebral organoids from human, chimpanzee, rhesus macaque, and common marmoset iPSC lines with minimal timing alterations required between species (Figure 1A). These organoids can be electroporated in the range of 20 dps to 50 dps, depending on the accessibility of the ventricle-like structures and the abundance of the cell population(s) of interest. However, prior to electroporation, it is important to determine whether the cere...
The procedures described here represent a unified protocol for the generation of cerebral organoids from different primate species with a targeted electroporation approach. This allows the ectopic expression of a GOI in a model system that emulates primate (including human) (patho)physiological neocortex development. This unified protocol for the generation of primate cerebral organoids uses the same materials (e.g., media) and protocol steps for all four primate species presented. Developmental differences between these...
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
We apologize to all the researchers whose work could not be cited due to space limitations. We thank Ulrich Bleyer of the technical services at DPZ and Hartmut Wolf of the workshop at MPI-CBG for the construction of the Petri dish electrode chambers; Stoyan Petkov and Rüdiger Behr for providing human (iLonza2.2), rhesus macaque (iRh33.1) and marmoset (cj_160419_5) iPSCs; Sabrina Heide for the cryosectioning and immunofluorescence staining; and Neringa Liutikaite and César Mateo Bastidas Betancourt for critically reading the manuscript. Work in the laboratory of W.B.H. was supported by an ERA-NET NEURON (MicroKin) grant. Work in the laboratory of M.H. was supported by an ERC starting grant (101039421).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
20 µL Microloader | Eppendorf | 5242956003 | |
2-Mercaptoethanol | Merck | 8.05740.0005 | |
35 mm cell culture dishes | Sarstedt | 83.3900 | |
60 mm cell culture dishes | CytoOne | CC7682-3359 | |
Activin A | Sigma-Aldrich | SRP3003 | |
AOC1 | Selleckchem | S7217 | |
Axio Observer.Z1 Inverted Fluorescence Microscope | Zeiss | replacable by comparable fluorescent microscopes | |
AZD0530 | Selleckchem | S1006 | |
B-27 Supplement with Vitamin A (retinoic acid, RA) (50x) | Gibco | 17504-044 | |
B-27 Supplement without Vitamin A (50x) | Gibco | 12587-010 | |
BTX ECM 830 Square Wave Electroporation System | BTX | 45-2052 | |
CGP77675 | Sigma-Aldrich | SML0314 | |
Chimpanzee induced pluripotent stem cell line Sandra A | doi: 10.7554/elife.18683 | ||
Common marmoset induced pluripotent stem cell line cj_160419_5 | doi: 10.3390/cells9112422 | ||
Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12) | Gibco | 11320-033 | |
Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) | Gibco | 14190-094 | pH 7.0−7.3; warm to room temperature before use |
Fast Green | Sigma-Aldrich | F7252-5G | |
Forskolin | Selleckchem | 2449 | |
GlutaMAX Supplement (100x) | Gibco | 35050-061 | glutamine substitute supplement |
Heparin (1 mg/mL stock) | Sigma-Aldrich | H3149 | |
Human induced pluripotent stem cell line iLonza2.2 | doi: 10.3390/cells9061349 | ||
Human Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3) | PeproTech | 450-03 | |
Insulin | Sigma-Aldrich | 19278 | |
IWR1 | Sigma-Aldrich | I0161 | |
Leica MS5 stereomicroscope (MDG 17 transmitted-light base) | Leica | 10473849 | replacable by comparable stereomicroscopes |
Matrigel | Corning | 354277/354234 | basement membrane matrix; alternatively, Geltrex (ThermoFisher Scientific, A1413302) can be used |
MEM Non-Essential Amino Acids Solution (100x) | Sigma-Aldrich | M7145 | |
N-2 Supplement (100x) | Gibco | 17502-048 | |
Neurobasal medium | Gibco | 21103-049 | |
Parafilm | Sigma-Aldrich | P7793 | |
Paraformaldehyde | Merck | 818715 | handle with causion due to cancerogenecity |
Penicillin/Streptomycin (10,000 U/mL) | PanBiotech | P06-07100 | |
Petri dish electrode chamber | self-produced (see Supplemental File 1) | also commertially available | |
Pre-Pulled Glass Pipettes | WPI | TIP10LT | borosilicate glass pipettes with long taper, 10 µm tip diameter |
Pro-Survival Compound | MerckMillipore | 529659 | |
Recombinant Human/Murine/RatBrain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) | PeproTech | AF-450-02 | |
Rhesus macaque induced pluripotent stem cell line iRh33.1 | doi: 10.3390/cells9061349 | ||
StemMACS iPS-Brew XF | Miltenyi Biotech | 130-104-368 | |
StemPro Accutase Cell Dissociation Reagent | Gibco | A1110501 | proteolytic and collagenolytic enzyme mixture |
TrypLE | Gibco | 12604-013 | recombinant trypsin substitute; warm to room temperature before use |
Ultra-Low Attachment 96-well plates | Costar | 7007 | |
Y27632 | Stemcell Technologies | 72305 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved