A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
* These authors contributed equally
Utilizing an immunocompetent, autochthonous tumor model driven by common patient mutations for preclinical testing is critical for immunotherapeutic testing. This protocol describes a method to generate brain tumor mouse models using electroporation-based delivery of plasmid DNA that represent common patient mutations, thus providing an accurate, reproducible, and consistent mouse model.
Tumor models are critical for the preclinical testing of brain tumors in terms of exploring new, more efficacious treatments. With significant interest in immunotherapy, it is even more critical to have a consistent, clinically pertinent, immunocompetent mouse model to examine the tumor and immune cell populations in the brain and their response to treatment. While most preclinical models utilize orthotopic transplantation of established tumor cell lines, the modeling system presented here allows for a "personalized" representation of patient-specific tumor mutations in a gradual, yet effective development from DNA constructs inserted into dividing neural precursor cells (NPCs) in vivo. DNA constructs feature the mosaic analysis with the dual-recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (MADR) method, allowing for single-copy, somatic mutagenesis of driver mutations. Using newborn mouse pups between birth and 3 days old, NPCs are targeted by taking advantage of these dividing cells lining the lateral ventricles. Microinjection of DNA plasmids (e.g., MADR-derived, transposons, CRISPR-directed sgRNA) into the ventricles is followed by electroporation using paddles that surround the rostral region of the head. Upon electrical stimulation, the DNA is taken up into the dividing cells, with the potential of integrating into the genome. The use of this method has successfully been demonstrated in developing both pediatric and adult brain tumors, including the most common malignant brain tumor, glioblastoma. This article discusses and demonstrates the different steps of developing a brain tumor model using this technique, including the procedure of anesthetizing young mouse pups, to microinjection of the plasmid mix, followed by electroporation. With this autochthonous, immunocompetent mouse model, researchers will have the ability to expand preclinical modeling approaches, in efforts to improve and examine efficacious cancer treatment.
Murine brain tumor models are crucial for understanding the mechanisms of brain tumor formation and treatment. Current models typically include rapidly produced subcutaneous or orthotopic transplantations of commonly used tumor cell lines, based on a limited number of driver mutations or patient-derived xenograft models, using immunodeficient mice that hinder proper immunotherapy studies1,2,3,4. Additionally, these preclinical results can lead to false positives, in that such models can exhibit dramatic, oftentimes curative effects in response to therapy, but this does not translate to the clinic2,5,6,7. Having the ability to rapidly produce genetically engineered preclinical mouse models that are more reflective of patient mutation signatures is imperative for improving the validity of preclinical results.
Electroporation (EP)-based delivery of DNA plasmids to induce both loss of function (LOF) and gain of function (GOF) mutations allows for the generation of such models. We developed a method for an even more precise representation of GOF driver mutations called mosaic analysis with dual-recombinase-mediated cassette exchange, or MADR8. This method allows for the expression of a gene (or genes) of interest in a controlled, locus-specific manner in somatic cells8. In combination with other molecular tools, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), different patient mutations can be combined to develop mouse brain tumor models. This method has been used for different pediatric brain tumors, including gliomas and ependymomas8, as well as adult brain tumor models, such as glioblastoma (GBM).
While the EP method of tumor modeling is not as common as a transplant, the following demonstrates heretofore the ease and high reproducibility of this modeling system. mTmG mice are used for the insertion of the MADR-plasmid DNA8,9. This system allows for the recombination of loxP and Flp recombinase target (FRT) sites located at the Rosa26 locus for subsequent insertion of the donor DNA plasmid (i.e., GOF gene of interest)8,9. The following protocol demonstrates the straightforwardness of this method after diligent practice, and the ability to develop mouse brain tumor models in an autochthonous, consistent manner.
All procedures in this protocol were approved by the Cedars Sinai Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Homozygous mTmG mice were bred with C57BL/6J mice to obtain litters of mixed-sex, heterozygous mTmG mice for use in the following protocol. The animals were obtained from a commercial source (see Table of Materials). Mouse pups were electroporated between postnatal days 0 and 3 (P0-P3).
1. Surgical setup
2. Pre-surgical preparation
3. Microinjection of DNA plasmid mix into the brain ventricle
4. Electroporation
5. Post-surgical steps
The protocol described above has been used to successfully develop both pediatric and adult brain tumor mouse models, with the former published in extensive detail in Kim et al.8. With proper technique and careful planning of plasmid design, the success for EP development of tumors is typically 100%. Histology is the quickest and easiest way to check for successful DNA plasmid insertion when a reporter protein is used. This protocol involves steps on how to develop a GBM brain tumor model with 100...
Electroporation-based delivery of plasmid DNA allows for the in vivo use of molecular biology, similar to that used in genetically engineered mouse models, but with the speed, localization, and efficiency of viral transduction8,13,14. With the latter, however, comes safety concerns as well as immune responses. We have shown in our modeling system using EP-delivery of plasmid DNA that minimal immune response occurs due t...
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank Gi Bum Kim for the immunofluorescent staining and images. We also thank Emily Hatanaka, Naomi Kobritz, and Paul Linesch for helpful advice on the protocol.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
0.1-2.5 µL 1-channel pipette | Eppendorf | 3123000012 | |
2 µL pipette tips | Fisher Scientific | 02-707-442 | |
20 µL pipette tips | Fisher Scientific | 02-707-432 | |
2-20 µL 1-channel pipette | Eppendorf | 3123000098 | |
DNAZap PCR DNA Degradation Solutions | Fisher Scientific | AM9890 | |
ECM 830 Square Porator Electroporator | BTX | 45-0662 | |
Electrode Gel | Parker Labs | PLI152CSZ | |
Fast Green Dye | Sigma-Aldrich | F7258-25G | |
Helping Hands Soldering Aid | Pro'sKit | 900-015 | |
Micro Dissecting Scissors, 4.5" Straight Sharp | Roboz | RS-5916 | |
Mouse Strain: C57BL/6J | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 000664 | |
Mouse Strain: Gt(ROSA)26Sortm4(ACTB-tdTomato,-EGFP)Luo/J | The Jackson Laboratory | JAX: 007676 | |
Parafilm | Grainger | 16Y894 | |
Plasmid: pCag-FlpO-2A-Cre EV | Addgene | 129419 | |
Platinum Tweezertrode, 7 mm Diameter | BTX | 45-0488 | |
Sharps container, 1-quart | Uline | S-15307 | |
Standard Glass Capillaries, 4 in, 1 mm OD, 0.58 mm ID | World Precision Instruments | 1B100F-4 | Capillary pipettes need to be pulled - see reference 10 for details. |
Vertical Micropipette Puller | Sutter Instruments | P-30 | Heat settings: Heat #1 at 880, Heat #2 at 680; pull at 800. See reference 10 for more details on pulling. |
Vimoba Tablet Solution | Quip Laboratories | VIMTAB | |
XenoWorks Digital Microinjector | Sutter Instruments | BRE | |
XenoWorks Micropipette Holder | Sutter Instruments | BR-MH |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved