A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

We present a protocol for the surgical implantation of a stabilized indwelling optical window for subcellular-resolution imaging of the murine pancreas, allowing serial and longitudinal studies of the healthy and diseased pancreas.

Abstract

The physiology and pathophysiology of the pancreas are complex. Diseases of the pancreas, such as pancreatitis and pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have high morbidity and mortality. Intravital imaging (IVI) is a powerful technique enabling the high-resolution imaging of tissues in both healthy and diseased states, allowing for real-time observation of cell dynamics. IVI of the murine pancreas presents significant challenges due to the deep visceral and compliant nature of the organ, which make it highly prone to damage and motion artifacts.

Described here is the process of implantation of the Stabilized Window for Intravital imaging of the murine Pancreas (SWIP). The SWIP allows IVI of the murine pancreas in normal healthy states, during the transformation from the healthy pancreas to acute pancreatitis induced by cerulein, and in malignant states such as pancreatic tumors. In conjunction with genetically labeled cells or the administration of fluorescent dyes, the SWIP enables the measurement of single-cell and subcellular dynamics (including single-cell and collective migration) as well as serial imaging of the same region of interest over multiple days.

The ability to capture tumor cell migration is of particular importance as the primary cause of cancer-related mortality in PDAC is the overwhelming metastatic burden. Understanding the physiological dynamics of metastasis in PDAC is a critical unmet need and crucial for improving patient prognosis. Overall, the SWIP provides improved imaging stability and expands the application of IVI in the healthy pancreas and malignant pancreas diseases.

Introduction

Benign and malignant pancreatic diseases are potentially life-threatening, with considerable gaps in the understanding of their pathophysiology. Pancreatitis-inflammation of the pancreas-is the third major cause of gastrointestinal disease-related hospital admissions and readmissions in the US and is associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and socioeconomic burden1. Ranked as the third leading cause of cancer-related death2, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for most pancreatic malignancies3 and portends a poor 5-year survival rate of only 11%2. The leading cause of cancer-related mortality in PDAC is overwhelming metastatic burden. Unfortunately, most patients present with metastatic disease. Therefore, understanding the dynamics of metastasis in PDAC is a critical unmet need in the field of cancer research.

The mechanisms underpinning inflammation and the metastatic cascade of the pancreas are poorly understood. A major contributor to this gap in knowledge is the inability to observe pancreatic cellular dynamics in vivo. Direct observation of these cellular dynamics promises to unveil critical targets to leverage and improve the diagnosis and treatment of those with pancreatic disease.

Intravital imaging (IVI) is a microscopy technique that allows researchers to visualize and study biological processes in living animals in real time. IVI allows high-resolution, direct visualization of intracellular and microenvironmental dynamics in vivo and within the native environment of the biological process in question. Therefore, IVI allows in vivo observation of healthy and pathologic processes.

Contemporary whole-body imaging modalities such as MRI, PET, and CT offer excellent views of entire organs and can reveal pathologies, even before the onset of clinical symptoms4. They are unable, however, to attain single-cell resolution or reveal the earliest stages of disease-pancreatitis or malignancy.

Previous research has used single-cell resolution IVI to observe benign and malignant diseases of skin5,6, breast7, lung8, liver9, brain10, and pancreatic tumors11, leading to insights into mechanisms of disease progression12. However, the murine pancreas poses significant obstacles to achieving single-cell resolution using IVI, primarily due to its deep visceral location and high compliance. Moreover, it is a branched, diffusely distributed organ within the mesentery that connects to the spleen, small intestine, and stomach, making it challenging to access. The tissue is also highly sensitive to motion caused by adjacent peristalsis and respiration. Minimizing movement of the pancreas is essential for single-cell resolution microscopy, as motion artifacts of even a few microns can blur and distort images, making tracking the dynamics of individual cells impossible13.

To perform IVI, an abdominal imaging window (AIW) must be surgically implanted9,11. To implant the AIW surgically, a metal window frame is sutured into the abdominal wall. Afterward, the organ of interest is attached to the frame using cyanoacrylate adhesive. While this is sufficient for some rigid internal organs (e.g., liver, spleen, rigid tumors), attempts at imaging the healthy murine pancreas are compromised by suboptimal lateral and axial stability due to the tissue's compliant texture and complex architecture14. To address this limitation, Park et al.14 developed an imaging window specifically designed for the healthy pancreas. This Pancreas Imaging Window (PIW) minimizes the influence of intestinal movement and breathing by incorporating a horizontal metal shelf within the window frame, just below the coverslip, stabilizing the tissue and maintaining its contact with the cover glass. While the PIW offers increased lateral stability, we found that this window still demonstrates axial drift and additionally prevents the imaging of large solid tumors due to the narrow gap between the metal shelf and coverslip15.

To address these limitations, we developed the Stabilized Window for Intravital imaging of the murine Pancreas (SWIP), an implantable imaging window capable of achieving stable long-term imaging of both the healthy and diseased pancreas (Figure 1)15. Here, we provide a comprehensive protocol for the surgical procedure used to implant the SWIP. Although the primary objective was to study the dynamic mechanisms involved in metastasis, this method can also be utilized to explore various aspects of pancreas biology and pathology.

Protocol

All procedures described in this protocol have been performed in accordance with guidelines and regulations for the use of vertebrate animals, including prior approval by the Albert Einstein College of Medicine Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).

1. Passivation of windows

NOTE: Passivation of stainless steel cleans the metal of contaminants and creates a thin oxide layer that greatly increases the metal's biocompatibility with soft tissues, even beyond that of titanium16.

  1. Start the passivation process by washing the optical window frames with a 1% (w/v) enzymatically-active detergent solution.
  2. Submerge the frames in a 5% (w/v) sodium hydroxide solution at 70 Β°C for 30 min inside a glass jar.
  3. Take out the frames and rinse them with deionized water.
  4. Immerse the frames in a 7% (w/v) citric acid solution at 55 Β°C for 10 min inside a new glass jar.
  5. Remove the frames and rinse them with deionized water again.
  6. Repeat step 1.2, and finally, rinse the window frames with deionized water one last time.

2. Preparation for tumor implantation or window surgery

NOTE: For studies of pancreatic tumors, tumor cells must be implanted and allowed to grow into overt tumors. To visualize the tumor cells in vivo,Β it is recommended to use cells that have been genetically altered to express fluorescent proteins such as Dendra2. Using fluorescent protein labels that are bright will mitigate potential issues with tissue autofluorescence. Other potential fluorescent proteins, dyes, and genetically encoded fluorescent mouse models that may be used have been discussed elsewhere17,18. To prevent contamination of the operative field, perform the surgical procedure in a hood or laminar flow cabinet and ensure that distinct areas are used for preparation, surgery, and recovery.

  1. Prior to the surgery, sterilize all surgical instruments in an autoclave and, if necessary, use a hot bead sterilizer for subsequent procedures. Ensure that the surgery employs a tips-only technique.
  2. Switch on the heated surgical pad and bead sterilizer and wait for it to reach the appropriate operating temperature. The heating pad temperature should be monitored with a surface thermometer to avoid potential burns. Place a sterile cloth over the heating pad if the temperature cannot be adequately controlled.
    NOTE: Body temperature during short procedures (≀20 min), such as tumor and window implantation, is minimally affected while using a heated surgical pad. However, longer periods of anesthesia, such as during extended timelapse imaging, require the mouse to be placed in a heated chamber to maintain body temperature.
  3. Anesthetize the mouse with 5% isoflurane in an anesthesia chamber.
  4. Critical Step: Lower the anesthesia to 2% once the mouse is unconscious. Carefully monitor the anesthesia level and the mouse's vitals (e.g., using a pulse oximeter)19.
  5. Place a small drop of eye lubricant on each eye of the mouse to prevent corneal drying.
  6. Prior to surgery, apply depilatory cream generously to the left upper abdomen to remove hair. After 20 s, use moistened tissue paper to firmly wipe away the hair and depilatory cream. Repeat the process as needed until all hair is removed from the surgical area.
  7. Inject 10 Β΅L of buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) diluted in 90 Β΅L of PBS subcutaneously to ensure preoperative analgesia.

3. Pancreas tumor implantation

  1. Prepare aliquots of tumor cells at the desired concentration (based on tumor cell doubling time). Place the cell suspension in an insulin syringe and keep it on ice. To follow this protocol, use 106 syngeneic KPC tumor cells20 suspended in a maximum of 50 Β΅L of PBS, following the orthotopic injection protocol adapted from Erstad et al.21
    NOTE: This cell line injected at this concentration routinely produced palpable or appropriately large tumors by 10-14 days. Subclones of this cell line and other pancreatic cell lines would need to be evaluated for appropriate concentrations and timelines to produce appropriately sized tumors).
  2. Wash hands using antiseptic soap.
  3. Prior to each new surgery, put on new sterile gloves.
  4. Transfer the mouse to the sterile surgical hood and place it in a partial right lateral decubitus position.
  5. Secure the limbs with paper tape.
    NOTE: Proper use of the instruments is important throughout the procedure. Examples of how to hold forceps, Castroviejo scissors, and the vacuum pickup tool are shown in Figure 2A-C.
  6. Sterilize the abdomen with antiseptic (Figure 2D).
  7. Ensure the animal is fully anesthetized by performing a toe pinch test.
  8. Make a 10-15 mm left subcostal incision in the skin using forceps and Castroviejo scissors (Figure 2E).
  9. Control hemostasis using cotton swabs or a cautery pen when/where deemed necessary.
  10. Carefully divide the underlying muscle with forceps and Castroviejo scissors to enter the peritoneum (Figure 2F).
  11. Using sterile cotton swabs, atraumatically externalize the pancreas and spleen.
  12. Splay the pancreas out so there are no folds (Figure 2G).
  13. Identify the desired tumor injection site in the body or tail of the pancreas (away from blood vessels).
  14. Critical step: After careful positioning of the pancreas, use forceps to provide tension to the tissue and insert the insulin syringe tip, with the bevel facing upwards, into the desired site of the pancreas to a depth of 4-5 mm (Figure 2H).
  15. Slowly inject the tumor cell solution. Look for a small bubble that confirms a successful injection (Figure 2I).
  16. Carefully return the pancreas to the abdomen without disturbing the tumor cell injection bubble (Figure 2J).
  17. Using absorbable 5-0 polydioxanone sutures, close the muscle layer first andΒ then the skin withΒ interrupted suturesΒ (Figure 2K-N).
  18. Cover the incision with cyanoacrylate glue (Figure 2O), then return the mouse to a clean cage under a heating lamp for recovery. Administer antibiotics in drinking water to prevent infection. Monitor the mice and allow them to completely recover from surgery.
    NOTE: Antibiotics are administered as required by IACUC protocol. All animals are housed individually.
  19. Allow the tumor to develop for 10-14 days until it is palpable through the abdominal wall.

4. Pancreas window surgery

  1. When the animals are ready for imaging, begin the window implantation surgery. To begin, wash hands with antiseptic soap.
  2. Before every new surgery, put on fresh sterile gloves.
  3. On the heated surgical stand, place the mouse in the right lateral decubitus position to expose the left abdomen.
  4. Anchor the mouse's front and hind limbs to the heated surgical stage cranially and caudally using paper tape. Ensure the spleen (beneath the skin) is visible within the surgical field (Figure 3A).
  5. To maintain sterility, unpackage all surgical instruments in the hood.
  6. Disinfect the surgical site by swabbing the mouse's skin with a generous application of antiseptic.
  7. Ensure the animal is fully anesthetized by performing a toe pinch test.
  8. Critical step: Lift the skin of the left upper quadrant of the abdomen with forceps and make a ~10 mm circular incision in the skin and musculature using Castroviejo scissors (Figure 3B,C).
  9. Control the bleeding and maintain hemostasis using cotton swabs or the cautery pen, where needed.
  10. Localize the pancreas, which is attached to the spleen, and identify the direction the pancreas is laying within the incision to decide where the supporting cross-stitch should be placed.
  11. Using 5-0 silk suture, place the first stitch at the desired location in the muscle layer. Tie this end with 3-5 knots. (Figure 3D,E)
  12. Continue to stitch directly across the incision. Cut and leave a tail of ~5 cm (Figure 3F).
  13. Repeat steps 4.11 and 4.12 perpendicular to the first stitch (Figure 3G,H).
  14. Critical step: Gently lift and position the pancreas over the cross-stitch (Figure 3I,J). Take care not to damage the pancreas during manipulation.
  15. Critical step: Using the 5-0 silk suture, perform a purse-string stitch ~1 mm from the hole, circumferentially, interlacing the skin and muscle layer (Figure 3K).
  16. Position the window frame so the edges of the circular incision are seated within the window's groove (Figure 3L).
  17. Fasten the implanted window by firmly tying down the 5-0 silk.
  18. Load 100 Β΅L of liquid cyanoacrylate adhesive into the 1 mL syringe.
  19. Dry the tissue by applying a delicate flow of compressed air for ~10 s.
  20. Clasp the window frame by its outer edge with forceps and gently raise it to ensure separation of the pancreas from the undersurface of the window frame.
  21. Critical step: Dispense a thin layer of liquid cyanoacrylate adhesive along the recess of the window (Figure 3M). Be sure not to get any of the adhesive on the pancreas tissue.
  22. Using vacuum pickups, lift the 5 mm coverslip.
  23. Carefully place the coverslip inside the recess in the center of the optical window frame. Hold with light pressure, allowing the cyanoacrylate adhesive to set (~25 s).
  24. Separate the coverslip from the vacuum pickups using forceps.
  25. Tighten the cross-stitch sutures to secure the pancreas snugly to the coverslip (Figure 3N,O). Note: Do not overtighten the cross-stitch as it can cause damage and ischemia to the pancreas.
  26. Cut the ends of the suture.
  27. Strip off the tape from the mouse.
  28. Switch off the isoflurane vaporizer.
  29. Relocate the mouse to a clean cage or directly to the intravital microscope.
  30. House the animals individually following windowΒ surgery and monitor themΒ until full recovery.
  31. Imaging is then carried out on a two-laser multiphoton microscope as we have previously described 22,23,24 For long imaging sessions the mouse is placed in a heated chamber to maintain body temperature and provided with supporting fluids as per IACUC standards.

5. Cerulein treatment for the induction of pancreatitis

  1. To investigate the onset of pancreatitis, treat healthy mice with cerulein after implantation of the SWIP. Ensure that the mice are fasted for 14-18 h and given ad libitum water before cerulein administration.
  2. Inject 50 Β΅g/kg of cerulein in 100 Β΅L of sterile 1x DPBS intraperitoneally at 1 h intervals for up to eight injections. Administer an equivalent volume of 1x DPBS alone, injected intraperitoneally, to the control mice.
  3. Following imaging, sacrifice the mice 24 h after the first injection by cervical dislocation as per IACUC standards.
  4. Perform imaging on a two-laser multiphoton microscope as previously described22,23,24. For long imaging sessions, place the mouse in a heated chamber to maintain the body temperature and provide it with supporting fluids as per IACUC standards.

Results

Figure 1,Β adapted from Du et al.15, shows image stills from a time-lapse IVI movie of the murine pancreas. Some tissue motion can be observed within the initial settling period (first hour of imaging, Figure 1A). However, with continued imaging after this settling period (>75 min), we observed an increase in lateral and axial stability (Figure 1B). The comparison of the stability of the SWIP with the...

Discussion

The SWIP protocol described here provides an improved method of pancreas tissue stabilization by utilizing a cross-stitch basket technique. Early abdominal imaging windows (AIWs) enabled intravital imaging (IVI) of internal organs of the abdomen but did not adequately limit the movement of soft tissues such as the pancreas. In response, Park et al. developed a pancreas imaging window (PIW) that incorporates a horizontal metal shelf and allows improved stabilization of the pancreas tissue while maintaining contact with th...

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The Evelyn Lipper Charitable Foundation, the Gruss-Lipper Biophotonics Center, the Integrated Imaging Program for Cancer Research, an NIH T-32 Fellowship (CA200561), and a Department of Defense Pancreatic Cancer Research Program (PCARP) grant PA210223P1.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1% (w/v) solution of enzyme-active detergentAlconox IncNAConcentrated, anionic detergent with protease enzymes for manual and ultrasonic cleaning
5% (w/v) solution of sodium hydroxideSigma-AldrichS8045Passivation reagent
5 mm cover glassElectron Microscopy Sciences72296-05Round Glass CoverslipsΒ 
7% (w/v) solution of citric acidSigma-AldrichΒ 251275Passivation reagent
28G 1 mL BD Insulin SyringeBD329410Syringe for cell injection
Baytril 100 (enrofloxacin)Bayer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)sc-362890RxAntibiotic
Bench Mount Heat LampMcMaster-Carr3349K51Heat lamp
Buprenorphine 0.3 mg/mLCovetrus North America059122Buprenorphine Analgesia
Castroviejo Curved ScissorsWorld Precision InstrumentsWP2220Scissor for cutting tissue
C57BL/6J MouseJackson Laboratory000664Β C57BL/6J Mouse
Chlorhexidine solutionDurvet7-45801-10258-3Chlorhexidine Disinfectant Solution
Compressed air canisterFalconDPSJB-12Compressed air for drying tissue
Cyano acrylate - Gel SuperglueStaples234790-6Skin Glue
Cyano acrylate - Liquid SuperglueStaplesLOC1647358Coverslip Glue
DPBS 1xCorning21-031-CVDPBS for cerulein/cell injections
Gemini Cautery KitHarvard Apparatus726067Cautery Pen
Germinator 500CellPoint ScientificGERΒ 5287-120VBead Sterilizer
Graefe Micro Dissecting Forceps; Serrated; Slight Curve; 0.8 mm Tip Width; 4" LengthRoboz SurgicalRS-5135Β Graefe Micro Dissecting Forceps
Imaging microscopeNANASee Entenberg et al. 2011 [27]
Imaging softwareNANASee Entenberg et al. 2011 [27]
Isoethesia (isoflurane)Henry Schein Animal Health50033Isoflurane Anesthesia
Kim WipesFisher Scientific06-666-AΒ Kim Wipes
Laboratory tapeFisher Scientific159015RLaboratory Tape
Mouse Dissecting KitWorld Precision InstrumentsMOUSEKITSurgical Instruments
Mouse Paw Pulse Oximeter SensorKent Scientific CorpoMSTAT Sensor-MSEPulse Oximeter
Mouse SurgisuiteKent ScientificSURGI-M04Heated platform
Nair Hair Removal LotionAmazonB001RVMR7KDepilatory Lotion
OxygenTechAirOX TMOxygen
PERMA-HAND Black Braided Silk Sutures, ETHICON Size 5-0VWR95056-872Silk Suture
Phosphate Buffered Saline 1xLife Technologies10010-023PBS
PhysioSuite SystemKent ScientificPhysioSuiteHeated Platform Controller
PuralubeHenry Schein Animal Health008897Eye Lubricant
Puritan Nonsterile Cotton-Tipped SwabsΒ Fisher Scientific867WCNOGLUECotton Swabs
SHARP Precision Barrier Tips, For P-100, 100 Β΅LDenville Scientific Inc.P1125100 Β΅L Pipet Tips
Tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate–DextranSigma-AldrichT1287-500MGVascular Label
Window-fixturing plateNANACustom made plate for window placement on microscope stage. Plate is made of 0.008 in stainless steel shim stock. For dimensions of plate see Entenberg et al., 2018 [8].
Window FrameNANAThe window is composed of a steel frame with a central aperture that accepts a 5 mm coverslip. A groove of 1.75 mm around the circumference of the frame provides space for the peritoneal muscle and skin layers to adhere to. See Entenberg et al., 2018 [8].

References

  1. Peery, A. F., et al. Burden and cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States: Update 2021. Gastroenterology. 162 (2), 621-644 (2022).
  2. Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S., Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 73 (1), 17-48 (2023).
  3. Adamska, A., Domenichini, A., Falasca, M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Current and evolving therapies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18 (7), 1338 (2017).
  4. Coste, A., Oktay, M. H., Condeelis, J. S., Entenberg, D. Intravital imaging techniques for biomedical and clinical research. Cytometry A. 97 (5), 448-457 (2020).
  5. Peters, N. C., et al. In vivo imaging reveals an essential role for neutrophils in leishmaniasis transmitted by sand flies. Science. 321 (5891), 970-974 (2008).
  6. Alexander, S., Koehl, G. E., Hirschberg, M., Geissler, E. K., Friedl, P. Dynamic imaging of cancer growth and invasion: a modified skin-fold chamber model. Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 130 (6), 1147-1154 (2008).
  7. Harney, A. S., et al. Real-time imaging reveals local, transient vascular permeability, and tumor cell intravasation stimulated by TIE2hi macrophage-derived VEGFA. Cancer Discovery. 5 (9), 932-943 (2015).
  8. Entenberg, D., et al. A permanent window for the murine lung enables high-resolution imaging of cancer metastasis. Nature Methods. 15 (1), 73-80 (2018).
  9. Ritsma, L., et al. Intravital microscopy through an abdominal imaging window reveals a pre-micrometastasis stage during liver metastasis. Science Translational Medicine. 4 (158), 158ra145 (2012).
  10. Park, K., You, J., Du, C., Pan, Y. Cranial window implantation on mouse cortex to study microvascular change induced by cocaine. Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. 5 (1), 97-107 (2015).
  11. Beerling, E., Oosterom, I., Voest, E., Lolkema, M., van Rheenen, J. Intravital characterization of tumor cell migration in pancreatic cancer. Intravital. 5 (3), e1261773 (2016).
  12. Entenberg, D., Oktay, M. H., Condeelis, J. S. Intravital imaging to study cancer progression and metastasis. Nature Reviews: Cancer. 23 (1), 25-42 (2023).
  13. Entenberg, D., et al. time-lapsed, large-volume, high-resolution intravital imaging for tissue-wide analysis of single cell dynamics. Methods. 128, 65-77 (2017).
  14. Park, I., Hong, S., Hwang, Y., Kim, P. A novel pancreatic imaging window for stabilized longitudinal in vivo observation of pancreatic islets in murine model. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal. 44 (1), 193-198 (2020).
  15. Du, W., et al. SWIP-a stabilized window for intravital imaging of the murine pancreas. Open Biology Journal. 12 (6), 210273 (2022).
  16. DeBold, T. A. M., James, W. . How To Passivate Stainless Steel Parts. , (2003).
  17. Drobizhev, M., Makarov, N. S., Tillo, S. E., Hughes, T. E., Rebane, A. Two-photon absorption properties of fluorescent proteins. Nature Methods. 8 (5), 393-399 (2011).
  18. Ueki, H., Wang, I. H., Zhao, D., Gunzer, M., Kawaoka, Y. Multicolor two-photon imaging of in vivo cellular pathophysiology upon influenza virus infection using the two-photon IMPRESS. Nature Protocols. 15 (3), 1041-1065 (2020).
  19. Ewald, A. J., Werb, Z., Egeblad, M. Monitoring of vital signs for long-term survival of mice under anesthesia. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. 2011 (2), pdb prot5563 (2011).
  20. Moral, J. A., et al. ILC2s amplify PD-1 blockade by activating tissue-specific cancer immunity. Nature. 579 (7797), 130-135 (2020).
  21. Erstad, D. J., et al. Orthotopic and heterotopic murine models of pancreatic cancer and their different responses to FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Disease Models & Mechanisms. 11 (7), dmm034793 (2018).
  22. Harney, A. S., Wang, Y., Condeelis, J. S., Entenberg, D. Extended time-lapse intravital imaging of real-time multicellular dynamics in the tumor microenvironment. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (112), e54042 (2016).
  23. Entenberg, D., et al. Imaging tumor cell movement in vivo. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. Chapter 19, 19.7.1-19.7.19 (2013).
  24. Entenberg, D., et al. Setup and use of a two-laser multiphoton microscope for multichannel intravital fluorescence imaging. Nature Protocols. 6 (10), 1500-1520 (2011).
  25. Rodriguez-Tirado, C., et al. Long-term high-resolution intravital microscopy in the lung with a vacuum stabilized imaging window. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (116), 54603 (2016).
  26. Seynhaeve, A. L. B., Ten Hagen, T. L. M. Intravital microscopy of tumor-associated vasculature using advanced dorsal skinfold window chambers on transgenic fluorescent mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (131), 55115 (2018).
  27. Gorelick, F. S., Lerch, M. M. Do animal models of acute pancreatitis reproduce human disease. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 4 (2), 251-262 (2017).
  28. Dolai, S., et al. Depletion of the membrane-fusion regulator Munc18c attenuates caerulein hyperstimulation-induced pancreatitis. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 293 (7), 2510-2522 (2018).
  29. Niederau, C., Ferrell, L. D., Grendell, J. H. Caerulein-induced acute necrotizing pancreatitis in mice: protective effects of proglumide, benzotript, and secretin. Gastroenterology. 88 (5 Pt 1), 1192-1204 (1985).
  30. Dunphy, M. P., Entenberg, D., Toledo-Crow, R., Larson, S. M. In vivo microcartography and subcellular imaging of tumor angiogenesis: a novel platform for translational angiogenesis research. Microvascular Research. 78 (1), 51-56 (2009).
  31. Shanja-Grabarz, X., Coste, A., Entenberg, D., Di Cristofano, A. Real-time, high-resolution imaging of tumor cells in genetically engineered and orthotopic models of thyroid cancer. Endocrine-Related Cancer. 27 (10), 529-539 (2020).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Intravital ImagingPancreasStabilizationSWIPMurinePancreatitisPancreatic AdenocarcinomaPDACSingle cell ResolutionHigh resolutionMicro cartography3D Imaging4D ImagingCellular InteractionsDisease MechanismsPhysiologyPathophysiology

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved