A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
This protocol provides an experimental framework to document the physical impact of the cytoskeleton on nuclear shape and the internal membrane-less organelles in the mouse oocyte system. The framework can be adapted for use in other cell types and contexts.
A major challenge in understanding the causes of female infertility is to elucidate mechanisms governing the development of female germ cells, named oocytes. Their development is marked by cell growth and subsequent divisions, two critical phases that prepare the oocyte for fusion with sperm to initiate embryogenesis. During growth, oocytes reorganize their cytoplasm to position the nucleus at the cell center, an event predictive of successful oocyte development in mice and humans and, thus, their embryogenic potential. In mouse oocytes, this cytoplasmic reorganization was shown to be driven by the cytoskeleton, the activity of which generates mechanical forces that agitate, reposition, and penetrate the nucleus. Consequently, this cytoplasmic-to-nucleoplasmic force transmission tunes the dynamics of nuclear RNA-processing organelles known as biomolecular condensates. This protocol provides an experimental framework to document, with high temporal resolution, the impact of the cytoskeleton on the nucleus across spatial scales in mouse oocytes. It details the imaging and image analysis steps and tools necessary to evaluate i) cytoskeletal activity in the oocyte cytoplasm, ii) cytoskeleton-based agitation of the oocyte nucleus, and iii) its effects on biomolecular condensate dynamics in the oocyte nucleoplasm. Beyond oocyte biology, the methods elaborated here can be adapted for use in somatic cells to similarly address cytoskeleton-based tuning of nuclear dynamics across scales.
Nuclear positioning is essential for multiple cellular and developmental functions1,2,3,4,5. Mammalian female germ cells named oocytes remodel their cytoplasm to position the nucleus at the cell center despite undergoing an asymmetric division in size, which relies on subsequent chromosome off-centering6 (Figure 1). This centering of the nucleus predicts successful oocyte development in mice and humans7, 8, and thus, their embryogenic potential (Figure 1).
Cytoplasmic remodeling in mouse oocytes is driven primarily by the actomyosin cytoskeleton9 (Figure 2). Its activity generates mechanical forces that agitate, reposition, and penetrate the nucleus10 (Figure 2). Consequently, this cytoplasmic-to-nucleoplasmic force transmission tunes the dynamics of nuclear messenger RNA-processing organelles named nuclear speckles11, one of several membrane-less organelles in the nucleus known as biomolecular condensates12,13,14,15,16 (Figure 2).
Live imaging has been decisive in deciphering the functional implications of nuclear agitation. Movies of nuclear migration over hours, as well as high-temporal resolution movies of the actin mesh and the bulk cytoplasm, largely contributed to the elaboration of a theoretical model for nuclear positioning, linking different timescales9. Also, high temporal resolution movies of the cytoplasm, nuclear outline and nuclear components such as chromatin and nuclear condensates, highlighted the role of cytoskeleton-based agitation of the nucleus on RNA-processing and gene expression in mouse oocytes, bridging different spatiotemporal scales within the cell10,11. Altogether, such a scale-crossing approach based on live imaging provided the first rationale linking cytoskeletal agitation of the nucleus to the developmental success of oocytes.
The protocol provides the imaging and image analysis pipeline used to study the transmission of cytoplasmic forces (generated primarily by F-actin and partly by microtubules) to the nucleus and its internal components in mouse oocytes. The outcome of these experiments is to capture the continuum of forces across spatial scales, from the cytoskeleton in the cytoplasm to the nuclear interior via high temporal resolution movies as shown in two recent studies10,11, that established the link between cytoplasmic active movements, fluctuations of the nuclear outline, as well as movement and surface fluctuations of a single type of nuclear biomolecular condensates: nuclear speckles. The same approach may be applied to other model systems where cytoplasmic forces are expected to change, such as in the context of malignant cancer cells17.
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the European Community and were approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture (authorization No. 75-1170) and by the Direction Générale de la Recherche et de l'Innovation (DGRI; GMO agreement number DUO-5291). Mice were housed in the animal facility on a 12 h light/dark cycle, with an ambient temperature of 22-24 °C and humidity of 40%-50%. Mice used here include female OF1 (Oncins France 1, 8 to 12 weeks old) and female C57BL/6 (10 to 14 weeks old).
1. Oocyte collection and preparation
2. Oocyte microinjection
NOTE: To capture cytoskeleton-based activity in the cytoplasm, brightfield live-imaging is used. Microinjection of fluorescent markers is therefore not necessary, and the protocol can be resumed at step 3. To image the nuclear outline, Rango, a probe displaying YFP tag at its N-terminus and a CFP tag at its C-terminus21,22, was used. When imaged in oocytes at 488 nm, it labels the whole nucleus, except for the nucleolus23, and displays a very sharp nuclear outline. To visualize nuclear speckles, SRSF2-GFP (NM_011358), a marker of nuclear speckles11, was used. The same medium is used for oocyte collection, microinjection, complementary RNA translation, and live cell imaging.
3. Live cell imaging
NOTE: Live mouse oocytes were examined with an inverted confocal microscope equipped with a Plan- APO 40x/1.25 NA oil immersion objective, a motorized scanning deck, an incubation chamber (37 °C), a CCD camera coupled to a filter wheel, and a spinning-disk. High temporal resolution images are acquired using Metamorph (hereafter referred to as the imaging software) in stream acquisition mode.
4. Image analysis: Cytoplasmic stirring
NOTE: The cytoplasmic stirring which reflects intensity of actin-based cytoskeletal activity in oocytes is determined by image correlation analyses using a software from a previous publication of the lab9 and available on27. The software measures how much pixel intensities are conserved between consecutive images. The output is the loss of correlation between images in time, starting at 1 and decreasing exponentially with time, as in9.
5. Image analysis: Cytoplasmic vector maps
NOTE: Mouse oocyte cytoplasmic vector maps were generated by the Spatiotemporal Image Correlation Spectroscopy (STICS) plugin30 previously implemented for detecting cytoplasmic flows in mouse oocytes31 on Fiji 32 and available on 33. The maps show cytoplasmic flow velocity magnitude and direction, as in9 and11.
6. Image analysis: Nuclear outline fluctuations
NOTE: Nuclear outline fluctuations which reflect nuclear membrane agitation can be determined from movies of nuclei labelled with YFP-Rango (Figure 4A,C). Image analysis for nuclear outline fluctuations requires Fiji and the installation of plugins StackReg (enable the BIG-EPFL update site29 to gain access to the StackReg plugin), PureDenoise34 and Ovocyte_nucleus. The StackReg plugin performs images registration to correct for possible global motion. The PureDenoise plugin removes noise of multidimensional images corrupted by mixed Poisson-Gaussian noise and smoothens the nuclear outline. The Ovocyte_nucleus plugin thresholds the signal and fills the hole corresponding to the nucleolus in order to create a binary nucleus mask, realign it with StackRreg and calculate the distance r from the centroid of the nucleus mask to the circumference of the mask for all θ angles (θ° from 0° to 360° by 1° increment), as in Figure 4. All codes for these plugins can be found at 35.
7. Image analysis: Nuclear speckle movements (diffusive dynamics)
NOTE: Nuclear speckle movement analysis allows to deduce the type of dynamics (driven, diffusive, or confined) of those organelles from their tracks.
8. Image analysis: Nuclear speckle surface fluctuations
NOTE: Nuclear speckle contour evolution in time, a read-out of active force transmission onto these organelles, was measured with a custom-built plugin Radioak36 for use in Fiji and available on37. The plugin extracts the values of radii of a given selection for all angles around the selection center. Shape variation over time was measured by comparing the value of the radius relative to its average value for each angle. The plugin allows to quantify the shape fluctuations and offers an option to visualize these dynamics. To install it, download the Radioak_.jar file and place it in the plugins folder of Fiji. Restart Fiji. This plugin is an updated version of the plugin used to analyse nuclear outline fluctuations above and implement a comparable pipeline.
Image panels in Figure 3 show examples of a typical fully grown oocyte (Figure 3A), the nucleoplasm in a fully grown oocyte expressing YFP-Rango (Figure 3B), the nucleoplasm in a fully grown oocyte expressing a correct (left panel; Figure 3C) or an excessive (right panel; Figure 3C) dose of SRSF2-GFP cRNA, and an immunostaining of nuclear speckles in a fully grown oocyte us...
Key steps in this protocol include proper microinjection of oocytes without affecting their survival or normal function9,10,11, as well as microinjecting predefined amounts of cRNA that would allow correct visualization of relevant structures, like nuclear speckles.
Establishing the link between cytoplasmic and (intra)-nuclear dynamics is essential when studying how the cytoskeleton agitates the nucle...
The authors declare no competing interests.
A.A.J. and M.A. co-wrote the manuscript and all co-authors commented on the manuscript. M. A. is supported by CNRS and "Projet Fondation ARC" (PJA2022070005322).A.A.J. is supported by Fondation des Treilles, Fonds Saint-Michel, and Fondation du Collège de France.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) | Sigma | A3311 | |
CSU-X1-M1 spinning disk | Yokogawa | ||
DMI6000B microscope | Leica | ||
Femtojet microinjector | Eppendorf | ||
Fiji | |||
Filter wheel | Sutter Instruments Roper Scientific | ||
Fluorodish | World Precision Instruments | FD35-100 | |
Metamorph software | Universal Imaging, | version 7.7.9.0 | |
Mineral oil | Sigma Aldrich | M8410-1L | |
NanoDrop 2000 | Thermo Scientific | ||
OF1 and C57BL/6 mice | Charles River Laboratories | ||
Poly(A) Tailing kit | Thermo Fisher | AM1350 | |
Retiga 3 CCD camera | QImaging | ||
RNAeasy kit | Qiagen | 74104 | |
SC35 antibody | Abcam | ab11826 | Nuclear speckle antibody; mouse IgG1 anti-SRSF2/SC35 (1:400) |
SRSF2-GFP plasmid | OriGene Technologies | MG202528 | NM_011358 |
Stripper Micropipette | XLAB Solutions | specialized for oocyte collection | |
T3 mMessage mMachine | Thermo Fisher | AM1384 | |
T7 mMessage mMachine | Thermo Fisher | AM13344 | |
Thermostatic chamber | Life Imaging Service | ||
Windows Excel | Windows |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved