A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol provides an experimental framework to document the physical impact of the cytoskeleton on nuclear shape and the internal membrane-less organelles in the mouse oocyte system. The framework can be adapted for use in other cell types and contexts.

Abstract

A major challenge in understanding the causes of female infertility is to elucidate mechanisms governing the development of female germ cells, named oocytes. Their development is marked by cell growth and subsequent divisions, two critical phases that prepare the oocyte for fusion with sperm to initiate embryogenesis. During growth, oocytes reorganize their cytoplasm to position the nucleus at the cell center, an event predictive of successful oocyte development in mice and humans and, thus, their embryogenic potential. In mouse oocytes, this cytoplasmic reorganization was shown to be driven by the cytoskeleton, the activity of which generates mechanical forces that agitate, reposition, and penetrate the nucleus. Consequently, this cytoplasmic-to-nucleoplasmic force transmission tunes the dynamics of nuclear RNA-processing organelles known as biomolecular condensates. This protocol provides an experimental framework to document, with high temporal resolution, the impact of the cytoskeleton on the nucleus across spatial scales in mouse oocytes. It details the imaging and image analysis steps and tools necessary to evaluate i) cytoskeletal activity in the oocyte cytoplasm, ii) cytoskeleton-based agitation of the oocyte nucleus, and iii) its effects on biomolecular condensate dynamics in the oocyte nucleoplasm. Beyond oocyte biology, the methods elaborated here can be adapted for use in somatic cells to similarly address cytoskeleton-based tuning of nuclear dynamics across scales.

Introduction

Nuclear positioning is essential for multiple cellular and developmental functions1,2,3,4,5. Mammalian female germ cells named oocytes remodel their cytoplasm to position the nucleus at the cell center despite undergoing an asymmetric division in size, which relies on subsequent chromosome off-centering6 (Figure 1). This centering of the nucleus predicts successful oocyte development in mice and humans7, 8, and thus, their embryogenic potential (Figure 1).

Cytoplasmic remodeling in mouse oocytes is driven primarily by the actomyosin cytoskeleton9 (Figure 2). Its activity generates mechanical forces that agitate, reposition, and penetrate the nucleus10 (Figure 2). Consequently, this cytoplasmic-to-nucleoplasmic force transmission tunes the dynamics of nuclear messenger RNA-processing organelles named nuclear speckles11, one of several membrane-less organelles in the nucleus known as biomolecular condensates12,13,14,15,16 (Figure 2).

Live imaging has been decisive in deciphering the functional implications of nuclear agitation. Movies of nuclear migration over hours, as well as high-temporal resolution movies of the actin mesh and the bulk cytoplasm, largely contributed to the elaboration of a theoretical model for nuclear positioning, linking different timescales9. Also, high temporal resolution movies of the cytoplasm, nuclear outline and nuclear components such as chromatin and nuclear condensates, highlighted the role of cytoskeleton-based agitation of the nucleus on RNA-processing and gene expression in mouse oocytes, bridging different spatiotemporal scales within the cell10,11. Altogether, such a scale-crossing approach based on live imaging provided the first rationale linking cytoskeletal agitation of the nucleus to the developmental success of oocytes.

The protocol provides the imaging and image analysis pipeline used to study the transmission of cytoplasmic forces (generated primarily by F-actin and partly by microtubules) to the nucleus and its internal components in mouse oocytes. The outcome of these experiments is to capture the continuum of forces across spatial scales, from the cytoskeleton in the cytoplasm to the nuclear interior via high temporal resolution movies as shown in two recent studies10,11, that established the link between cytoplasmic active movements, fluctuations of the nuclear outline, as well as movement and surface fluctuations of a single type of nuclear biomolecular condensates: nuclear speckles. The same approach may be applied to other model systems where cytoplasmic forces are expected to change, such as in the context of malignant cancer cells17.

Protocol

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the European Community and were approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture (authorization No. 75-1170) and by the Direction Générale de la Recherche et de l'Innovation (DGRI; GMO agreement number DUO-5291). Mice were housed in the animal facility on a 12 h light/dark cycle, with an ambient temperature of 22-24 °C and humidity of 40%-50%. Mice used here include female OF1 (Oncins France 1, 8 to 12 weeks old) and female C57BL/6 (10 to 14 weeks old).

1. Oocyte collection and preparation

  1. Collect oocytes from 8 to 14-week old mice as described in18 and19.
    1. Briefly, first extract ovaries from mice as in18 into pre-warmed (37 °C) M2+Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) medium supplemented with 1 µM Milrinone19, which prevents meiosis resumption in oocytes.
    2. Puncture ovarian follicles with surgical needles to release growing oocytes from antral follicles (end of oocyte growth20).
    3. Collect oocytes of the size needed for experiments (growing and/or fully grown oocytes) with a micropipette specialized for oocyte collection, before washing and moving into dishes with fresh medium under mineral oil.
  2. Mechanically dissociate oocytes from antral follicular cells by pipetting up-and-down and leave to stabilize for 1 h in the incubator at 37 °C prior to proceeding with subsequent experimental steps.
    ​NOTE: Oocytes are kept at 37 °C during all experimental steps. For this protocol, the largest oocytes, which are the fully-grown ones, were collected.

2. Oocyte microinjection

NOTE: To capture cytoskeleton-based activity in the cytoplasm, brightfield live-imaging is used. Microinjection of fluorescent markers is therefore not necessary, and the protocol can be resumed at step 3. To image the nuclear outline, Rango, a probe displaying YFP tag at its N-terminus and a CFP tag at its C-terminus21,22, was used. When imaged in oocytes at 488 nm, it labels the whole nucleus, except for the nucleolus23, and displays a very sharp nuclear outline. To visualize nuclear speckles, SRSF2-GFP (NM_011358), a marker of nuclear speckles11, was used. The same medium is used for oocyte collection, microinjection, complementary RNA translation, and live cell imaging.

  1. Linearize Rango plasmid with SfiI or SRSF2-GFP plasmid with AgeI restriction enzymes.
  2. Synthetize capped complimentary RNAs (cRNA) with the appropriate in vitro transcription kit according to the promoter (T3 for Rango and T7 for SRSF2-GFP) and purify them using a column purification kit, as previously described24.
    NOTE: Polyadenylate SRSF2-GFP RNA using a polyadenylation kit to increase cRNA stability. Two different promoters are used due to differences in the plasmid backbone.
  3. Measure cRNA concentrations using a microvolume spectrophotometer.
  4. Dilute Rango cRNA to 1000 ng/µL and SRSF2-GFP cRNA to 600 ng/µL in dH2O.
  5. Centrifuge cRNA aliquot at 4 °C for at least 60 min at 25,000 x g before microinjection.
  6. Inject cRNAs coding for YFP-Rango or SRSF2-GFP as described in11,25 into the cytoplasm of oocytes in 37 °C M2+ BSA+Milrinone medium using a microinjector.
  7. Incubate oocytes for at least 2 h in culture medium at 37 °C for cRNA translation.
  8. Deposit oocytes into small (5 µL) culture medium droplets on a 35 mm tissue culture dish with cover glass bottom covered with mineral oil. Place one oocyte per droplet to avoid photobleaching of neighboring oocytes.

3. Live cell imaging

NOTE: Live mouse oocytes were examined with an inverted confocal microscope equipped with a Plan- APO 40x/1.25 NA oil immersion objective, a motorized scanning deck, an incubation chamber (37 °C), a CCD camera coupled to a filter wheel, and a spinning-disk. High temporal resolution images are acquired using Metamorph (hereafter referred to as the imaging software) in stream acquisition mode.

  1. Open the Acquire window of the imaging software.
  2. Set exposure time to 500 ms, camera area on Full Chip and binning on 1.
  3. In the Acquire tab, set illumination for the required channel. To image cytoplasmic activity, illuminate oocytes with transmitted light. To image the nucleus labelled with YFP-Rango or SRSF2-GFP, illuminate oocytes with an excitation wavelength of 491 nm.
  4. For cytoplasmic stirring or YFP-Rango experiments, focus on the oocyte nucleolus which can be easily observed with transmitted light (Figure 3A). One single plane will be acquired. For nuclear speckle experiments, focus on SRSF2-GFP droplets (Figure 3C).
  5. In the Special tab, set parameters in order to optimize acquisition speed as below.
    Camera shutter: Open for exposure
    Clear mode: CLEAR PRESEQUENCE
  6. Open the Stream Acquisition window of the imaging software. Set the streaming parameters according to the experiment. For both studies10,11, use the parameters described below.
    1. In the Acquire tab, set the following parameters.
      Acquisition mode: Stream to RAM
      Number of frames: 480 (can be decreased to 240 frames to decrease imaging time)
      Camera parameters: Acquire images at frame rate
      Number (Nb) of frames to skip: 0
    2. In the Digital Camera Controller Parameters tab, set the following parameters.
      Camera state: HALT
      Shutter mode: OPEN NEVER
      Clear mode: CLEAR PRESEQUENCE
      Nb of frames to average: 1
      NOTE 1: In Stream mode, once the exposure time is set, movie duration is determined by the number of frames. For example, 500 ms exposure time and 480 frames generate a movie of 4 min. A preview can be displayed during image acquisition.
  7. Adjust a region of interest (ROI) around the object. Minimizing the area of the ROI reduces acquisition time.
  8. Click on Acquire in the Stream Acquisition window to launch the movie.
  9. Save movie as a .tif file at the end of acquisition.
    NOTE: To follow nuclear structures during high temporal resolution movies, nuclear probes (YFP-Rango and SRSF2-GFP) should have a high signal-to-noise ratio to facilitate segmentation of the objects during further steps of image analysis. Exogenous SRSF2-GFP expression profiles should be comparable to endogenous nuclear speckle immunostainings (Figure 3C-D). Changes in SRSF2-GFP expression profiles relative to endogenous staining may reflect high doses of cRNA injection and translation26 (Figure 3C-D).

4. Image analysis: Cytoplasmic stirring

NOTE: The cytoplasmic stirring which reflects intensity of actin-based cytoskeletal activity in oocytes is determined by image correlation analyses using a software from a previous publication of the lab9 and available on27. The software measures how much pixel intensities are conserved between consecutive images. The output is the loss of correlation between images in time, starting at 1 and decreasing exponentially with time, as in9.

  1. Align raw time-lapse images (Δt=0.5 s) using the Fiji StackReg plugin (Plugins>StackReg). To install the plugin StackReg28, enable the BIG-EPFL update site29 to gain access to the plugin.
  2. Calculate bright-field image correlations in 3 to 4 cytoplasmic regions of ~300 µm2 following the steps below.
    1. Crop the regions and save them as separate movie files. Open the Terminal window.
    2. Type oocyte, press the Space Bar and then press Enter. A window called Signal and Slot appears. Choose the cropped movie files that will be analyzed.
      NOTE: Several movies can be selected at the same time.
  3. The application returns files in the same folder as the movies. Three different files with .csv, .eps and .xls extensions are generated. The .xls file contains the data to draw the correlation plots for one region. Average correlation values from different regions within a cell.
  4. For visual clarity purposes, transform final correlation values by subtracting the value of each timepoint from 1 to obtain an inverted exponential-like curve as in 11.

5. Image analysis: Cytoplasmic vector maps

NOTE: Mouse oocyte cytoplasmic vector maps were generated by the Spatiotemporal Image Correlation Spectroscopy (STICS) plugin30 previously implemented for detecting cytoplasmic flows in mouse oocytes31 on Fiji 32 and available on 33. The maps show cytoplasmic flow velocity magnitude and direction, as in9 and11.

  1. Convert bright-field time-lapse images (Δt=0.5 s) to 32-bit format.
  2. Realign images with the Fiji StackReg plugin in Plugins > StackReg and choose Rigid Body transformation.
  3. With the plugin stack subtract moving average jru v2(in Detrend tools of the STICS plugins suite), get rid of stationary structures in the movie by subtracting the time-averaged image of the movie. Check boxes Subtract Static Average and Output Sub Stack, select Maintain Spatial Average and set period on 5.
  4. Draw a ROI around the oocyte, excluding the cortex to avoid border effects of the plugin.
  5. Launch the STICS map jru V2 plugin (in ICS tools), with subregion size of 32 pixels, step size of 16 pixels, STICS temporal shift of 3, X and Y offsets of 0, velocity multiplier of 8, magnitude threshold of 0 and check boxes of Normalize Vector Length, Center Vectors, Output Velocities and Use Movie Mask.
    ​NOTE: The plugin generates a map of the oocyte in .tif format, displaying cytoplasmic flows as vectors with colors indicating flow amplitudes, as in9 and11, and an excel file with measured flow velocities.

6. Image analysis: Nuclear outline fluctuations

NOTE: Nuclear outline fluctuations which reflect nuclear membrane agitation can be determined from movies of nuclei labelled with YFP-Rango (Figure 4A,C). Image analysis for nuclear outline fluctuations requires Fiji and the installation of plugins StackReg (enable the BIG-EPFL update site29 to gain access to the StackReg plugin), PureDenoise34 and Ovocyte_nucleus. The StackReg plugin performs images registration to correct for possible global motion. The PureDenoise plugin removes noise of multidimensional images corrupted by mixed Poisson-Gaussian noise and smoothens the nuclear outline. The Ovocyte_nucleus plugin thresholds the signal and fills the hole corresponding to the nucleolus in order to create a binary nucleus mask, realign it with StackRreg and calculate the distance r from the centroid of the nucleus mask to the circumference of the mask for all θ angles (θ° from 0° to 360° by 1° increment), as in Figure 4. All codes for these plugins can be found at 35.

  1. On Fiji, in the Plugins > CIRB > Verlhac menu, select Ovocyte Nucleus Shape.
  2. In the dialog box, perform the following selection.
    1. Select the folder containing the movies to analyze.
    2. Select the θ angle (a value from 1° to 360° can be chosen and a value of 1° was used for optimal outline resolution), the margins for cropping (5 µm is recommended in order to keep the whole nucleus).
    3. Select the XY calibration and the time interval. Click on OK.
      NOTE: Results are provided as .xls files in an out folder in the folder containing the original movies. This file displays all measured radii r for each time t and each angle θ. An example of output file is provided in Supplementary Table 1. The out folder also contains a movie of the nucleus mask.
  3. Using a spreadsheet, calculate the mean radius R over all the time points t for each defined θ angle. This allows to plot the mean shape over time (Figure 4B). See example in Supplementary Table 2.
  4. For each t and θ subtract the mean radius R over time from the radius r. The variance (r-R)2 is a measure of nuclear envelope fluctuations.
  5. Calculate the mean of the fluctuations for all time points t and all angles θ for each nucleus and eventually for all nuclei from one condition.
    NOTE: When the shape of nuclei is significantly altered such as in the case of a disrupted cytoskeleton, nuclei labelled with YFP-Rango are rotated on Fiji to orient the smooth part up and the invagination down, prior to proceeding with analysis of nuclear outline fluctuations, as in10.

7. Image analysis: Nuclear speckle movements (diffusive dynamics)

NOTE: Nuclear speckle movement analysis allows to deduce the type of dynamics (driven, diffusive, or confined) of those organelles from their tracks.

  1. Select stream-mode images of oocytes expressing SRSF2-GFP droplets that primarily move in the X-Y axis.
  2. Correct for bleaching of time-lapse images of oocytes expressing SRSF2- GFP using the histogram matching method in Fiji (Image > Adjust > Bleach Correction).
  3. Realign images with the Fiji StackReg plugin.
  4. Track SRSF2-GFP droplet centers using the Fiji Manual Tracking plugin (Plugins > Tracking > Manual Tracking). Press Add Track to start tracking and press End Track when finished. Do not activate centering correction.
  5. Copy tracks to a spreadsheet file to proceed with temporal Mean Square Displacements (MSD) calculations as in 11, and calculate temporal MSDs from each 20 s droplet trajectories.
  6. Fit curves (msd(t) = beta x tα) with the Nelder-Mead method using R software to estimate the diffusion exponent alpha (α).
  7. Measure the effective diffusion coefficient to be able to compare the different conditions since the diffusion is expected to be anomalous (α< 1).
  8. Calculate the effective diffusion coefficient Deff from a linear fit (alpha=1) on the 40 first points (20 s) of the temporal MSD curve and normalize by droplet size (Deff in µm2/s x 3/2 πr in µm).

8. Image analysis: Nuclear speckle surface fluctuations

NOTE: Nuclear speckle contour evolution in time, a read-out of active force transmission onto these organelles, was measured with a custom-built plugin Radioak36 for use in Fiji and available on37. The plugin extracts the values of radii of a given selection for all angles around the selection center. Shape variation over time was measured by comparing the value of the radius relative to its average value for each angle. The plugin allows to quantify the shape fluctuations and offers an option to visualize these dynamics. To install it, download the Radioak_.jar file and place it in the plugins folder of Fiji. Restart Fiji. This plugin is an updated version of the plugin used to analyse nuclear outline fluctuations above and implement a comparable pipeline.

  1. In stream movies of SRSF2-GFP droplets, select larger droplets of comparable sizes (radius ~2.5 µm).
    NOTE: If droplets are too small, insufficient resolution will lead to aberrant surface fluctuation measurements.
  2. Crop time-lapse images of droplets spanning 15 s (Δt= 0.5 s) by drawing a rectangle around the droplet and select Image > Crop (Figure 5).
  3. Realign images with the Fiji StackReg plugin in Plugins > StackReg and choose Rigid Body transformation.
  4. Smoothen image to remove noise around droplet using the Fiji Smoothen option under Process.
  5. Create binary mask of droplet using Convert to Mask option in Fiji under Process > Binary. Use Default method and Dark for background (Figure 5).
  6. Analyze the generated binary droplet mask using the Analyze Particles option in Fiji under Analyze, select Clear Results and Add to Manager options and save the region of interests (ROIs) in the RoiManager (More > Save) in zip format to be read by Radioak. The ROIs must be saved in a folder called contours in the same folder of the movies, in files called imagename_UnetCortex.zip for each movie to be found by Radioak.
  7. In the Fiji Plugins > CIRB > Radioak menu, select either Get Radii to process one movie only or Do One Folder to analyze all movies of the same folder.
    NOTE: A window pops up to select the angle number and scale. Radioak was launched with 1° angle increments from 0° to 360° (input of 360) and the radii values were extracted.
  8. Select the movie or the folder containing the movies to analyze. Results are provided as .xls files (one for each movie) in a radioakres directory in the folder containing the original movies. Each file displays all measured radii r (in µm if the scale parameter was filled) for each time t (in slice) and each angle (in radians; Figure 5; see example of .xls output in Supplementary Table 3).
  9. In the spreadsheet, calculate the mean radius R over all the time points t for each defined angle (see example in Supplementary Table 4). This allows to plot the mean shape over time.
  10. Plot the variance (r-R)2 in µm2 which corresponds to the measure of droplet surface fluctuations.

Results

Image panels in Figure 3 show examples of a typical fully grown oocyte (Figure 3A), the nucleoplasm in a fully grown oocyte expressing YFP-Rango (Figure 3B), the nucleoplasm in a fully grown oocyte expressing a correct (left panel; Figure 3C) or an excessive (right panel; Figure 3C) dose of SRSF2-GFP cRNA, and an immunostaining of nuclear speckles in a fully grown oocyte us...

Discussion

Key steps in this protocol include proper microinjection of oocytes without affecting their survival or normal function9,10,11, as well as microinjecting predefined amounts of cRNA that would allow correct visualization of relevant structures, like nuclear speckles.

Establishing the link between cytoplasmic and (intra)-nuclear dynamics is essential when studying how the cytoskeleton agitates the nucle...

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

A.A.J. and M.A. co-wrote the manuscript and all co-authors commented on the manuscript. M. A. is supported by CNRS and "Projet Fondation ARC" (PJA2022070005322).A.A.J. is supported by Fondation des Treilles, Fonds Saint-Michel, and Fondation du Collège de France.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)Sigma A3311
CSU-X1-M1 spinning diskYokogawa
DMI6000B microscope Leica
Femtojet microinjectorEppendorf
Fiji
Filter wheelSutter Instruments Roper Scientific
FluorodishWorld Precision InstrumentsFD35-100
Metamorph software Universal Imaging, version 7.7.9.0
Mineral oilSigma AldrichM8410-1L
NanoDrop 2000 Thermo Scientific
OF1 and C57BL/6 mice Charles River Laboratories
Poly(A) Tailing kit Thermo FisherAM1350
Retiga 3 CCD camera QImaging
RNAeasy kit Qiagen74104
SC35 antibodyAbcamab11826Nuclear speckle antibody; mouse IgG1 anti-SRSF2/SC35 (1:400)
SRSF2-GFP plasmid  OriGene TechnologiesMG202528NM_011358
Stripper Micropipette XLAB Solutionsspecialized for oocyte collection
T3 mMessage mMachineThermo FisherAM1384 
T7 mMessage mMachine Thermo FisherAM13344
Thermostatic chamberLife Imaging Service
Windows ExcelWindows

References

  1. Quinlan, M. E. Cytoplasmic Streaming in the Drosophila Oocyte. Annual Rev Cell Developl Biol. 32, 173-195 (2016).
  2. Goldstein, R. E., van de Meent, J. W. A physical perspective on cytoplasmic streaming. Interface Focus. 5 (4), 20150030 (2015).
  3. Gundersen, G. G., Worman, H. J. Nuclear positioning. Cell. 152 (6), 1376-1389 (2013).
  4. Metzger, T. MAP and kinesin-dependent nuclear positioning is required for skeletal muscle function. Nature. 484 (7392), 120-124 (2012).
  5. Roman, W. Muscle repair after physiological damage relies on nuclear migration for cellular reconstruction. Science. 374 (6565), 355-359 (2021).
  6. Almonacid, M., Terret, M. E., Verlhac, M. H. Control of nucleus positioning in mouse oocytes. Semin Cell Develop Biol. 82, 34-40 (2018).
  7. Brunet, S., Maro, B. Germinal vesicle position and meiotic maturation in mouse oocyte. Reproduction. 133 (6), 1069-1072 (2007).
  8. Levi, M., Ghetler, Y., Shulman, A., Shalgi, R. Morphological and molecular markers are correlated with maturation-competence of human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 28 (9), 2482-2489 (2013).
  9. Almonacid, M., et al. Active diffusion positions the nucleus in mouse oocytes. Nat Cell Biol. 17 (4), 470-479 (2015).
  10. Almonacid, M., et al. Active fluctuations of the nuclear envelope shape the transcriptional dynamics in oocytes. Dev Cell. 51 (2), 145-157 (2019).
  11. Al Jord, A., et al. Cytoplasmic forces functionally reorganize nuclear condensates in oocytes. Nat Commun. 13 (1), 5070 (2022).
  12. Shin, Y., Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science. 357 (6357), eaaf4382 (2017).
  13. Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A., Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat Rev. Mol Cell Biol. 18 (5), 285-298 (2017).
  14. Lyon, A. S., Peeples, W. B., Rosen, M. K. A framework for understanding the functions of biomolecular condensates across scales. Nat Rev. Mol Cell Biol. 22 (3), 215-235 (2021).
  15. Gordon, J. M., Phizicky, D. V., Neugebauer, K. M. Nuclear mechanisms of gene expression control: pre-mRNA splicing as a life or death decision. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 67, 67-76 (2021).
  16. Barutcu, A. R. Systematic mapping of nuclear domain-associated transcripts reveals speckles and lamina as hubs of functionally distinct retained introns. Mol Cell. 82 (5), 1035-1052.e9 (2022).
  17. Guo, M. Probing the stochastic, motor-driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy. Cell. 158 (4), 822-832 (2014).
  18. Verlhac, M. H., Kubiak, J. Z., Clarke, H. J., Maro, B. Microtubule and chromatin behavior follow MAP kinase activity but not MPF activity during meiosis in mouse oocytes. Development. 120 (4), 1017-1025 (1994).
  19. Reis, A., Chang, H. Y., Levasseur, M., Jones, K. T. APCcdh1 activity in mouse oocytes prevents entry into the first meiotic division. Nat Cell Biol. 8 (5), 539-540 (2006).
  20. El-Hayek, S., Clarke, H. J. Control of oocyte growth and development by intercellular communication within the follicular niche. Results Probl Cell Differ. 58, 191-224 (2016).
  21. Dumont, J. A centriole- and RanGTP-independent spindle assembly pathway in meiosis I of vertebrate oocytes. J Cell Biol. 176 (3), 295-305 (2007).
  22. Kaláb, P., Pralle, A., Isacoff, E. Y., Heald, R., Weis, K. Analysis of a RanGTP-regulated gradient in mitotic somatic cells. Nature. 440 (7084), 697-701 (2006).
  23. Lafontaine, D. L. J., Riback, J. A., Bascetin, R., Brangwynne, C. P. The nucleolus as a multiphase liquid condensate. Nat Rev. Mol Cell Biol. 22 (3), 165-182 (2021).
  24. Terret, M. E., et al. DOC1R: a MAP kinase substrate that control microtubule organization of metaphase II mouse oocytes. Development. 130 (21), 5169-5177 (2003).
  25. Dumont, J., Verlhac, M. H. Using FRET to study RanGTP gradients in live mouse oocytes. Methods Mol Biol. 957, 107-120 (2013).
  26. McSwiggen, D. T., Mir, M., Darzacq, X., Tjian, R. Evaluating phase separation in live cells: diagnosis, caveats, and functional consequences. Gene Develop. 33 (23-24), 1619-1634 (2019).
  27. . OOCytes Available from: https://github.com/Carreau/OOCytes (2014)
  28. Thévenaz, P., Ruttimann, U. E., Unser, M. A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE transactions on image processing. 7 (1), 27-41 (1998).
  29. . ImageJ Available from: https://imagej.github.io/update-sites/big-epfl (2023)
  30. Hebert, B., Costantino, S., Wiseman, P. W. Spatiotemporal image correlation spectroscopy (STICS) theory, verification, and application to protein velocity mapping in living CHO cells. Biophys J. 88 (5), 3601-3614 (2005).
  31. Yi, K., et al. Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3-complex-driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes. Nat Cell Biol. 13 (10), 1252-1258 (2011).
  32. Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 9, 676-682 (2012).
  33. . Stowers ImageJ Plugins Available from: https://research.stowers.org/imagejplugins/ (2023)
  34. Luisier, F., Vonesch, C., Blu, T., Unser, M. Fast interscale wavelet denoising of Poisson-corrupted images. Signal Process. 90 (2), 415-427 (2010).
  35. . Ovocyte_Nucleus Available from: https://github.com/orion-cirb/Ovocyte_Nucleus (2023)
  36. Letort, G. . gletort/ImageJFiles: GLijplugs_v0.2.0. , (2022).
  37. . ImageJFiles Available from: https://github.com/gletort/ImageJFiles/tree/master/radioak (2023)
  38. Chu, F. Y., Haley, S. C., Zidovska, A. On the origin of shape fluctuations of the cell nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 114 (39), 10338-10343 (2017).
  39. Caragine, C. M., Haley, S. C., Zidovska, A. Surface fluctuations and coalescence of nucleolar droplets in the human cell nucleus. Phys Rev Lett. 121 (14), 148101 (2018).
  40. Introini, V., Kidiyoor, G. R., Porcella, G., Cicuta, P., Cosentino Lagomarsino, M. Centripetal nuclear shape fluctuations associate with chromatin condensation in early prophase. Commun Biol. 6 (1), 1-11 (2023).
  41. Boija, A., Klein, I. A., Young, R. A. Biomolecular condensates and cancer. Cancer Cell. 39 (2), 174-192 (2021).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

CytoskeletonAgitationMouse Oocyte NucleusSpatial ScalesMechanical TransductionMaternal RNAsNuclear RNA Processing BodiesCytoplasm to nucleus Force TransmissionBiomolecular CondensatesCytoplasmic ReorganizationFemale GametogenesisInfertility

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved