A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Here, we describe a non-invasive approach using near-infrared spectroscopy to assess reactive hyperemia in the lower limb. This protocol provides a standardized assessment of vascular and microvascular responsiveness that may be used to determine the presence of vascular dysfunction as well as the efficacy of therapeutic interventions.
Vascular diseases of the lower limb contribute substantially to the global burden of cardiovascular disease and comorbidities such as diabetes. Importantly, microvascular dysfunction can occur prior to, or alongside, macrovascular pathology, and both potentially contribute to patient symptoms and disease burden. Here, we describe a non-invasive approach using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during reactive hyperemia, which provides a standardized assessment of lower limb vascular (dys)function and a potential method to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. Unlike alternative methods, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound, this approach does not require venous access or sophisticated image analysis, and it is inexpensive and less operator-dependent. This description of the NIRS method includes representative results and standard terminology alongside the discussion of measurement considerations, limitations, and alternative methods. Future application of this work will improve standardization of vascular research design, data collection procedures, and harmonized reporting, thereby enhancing translational research outcomes in the areas of lower limb vascular (dys)function, disease, and treatment.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading contributor to global mortality1. While myocardial infarction and stroke are the most common manifestations of CVD, vascular diseases of the lower limbs, such as peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and diabetic foot disease, contribute substantially to the personal, social, and healthcare burden of CVD2,3,4. Importantly, these disease states are characterized by microvascular and macrovascular dysfunction5 that contribute to symptoms (e.g., intermittent claudication), functional impairment, poor mobility as well as social isolation and reduced quality of life6. Historically, upper-limb vascular assessment techniques have been used as a measure of systemic vascular function and associated cardiovascular risk; however, these methods are potentially not sensitive to local impairments in lower limb vascular function7,8. While there is currently a range of techniques used to assess vascular function in the lower limb, such as flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound, each method has disadvantages and limitations, such as equipment cost, operator skill, or the need for invasive venous access. For these reasons, there is a need for standardized and effective techniques to evaluate lower limb vascular (dys)function that can be more readily implemented in research and clinical settings.
Continuous wave near-infrared spectroscopy (CW-NIRS) is a non-invasive, low-cost, and portable method that quantifies the relative changes in hemoglobin oxygenation in vivo. As the NIRS oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin signals are derived from the small (<1 mm in diameter) vessels, local skeletal muscle metabolism and microvascular function are able to be evaluated9. Specifically, the tissue saturation index (TSI) [TSI = oxygenated hemoglobin/ (oxygenated hemoglobin + deoxygenated hemoglobin) x 100], provides a quantitative measure of tissue oxygenation9. When measured before, during, and after occlusion and reactive hyperemia, the changes in TSI indicate 'end-organ' vascular responsiveness, relative to the pre-occlusion baseline. Importantly, this method is sensitive to alterations in muscle microvascular responsiveness and perfusion associated with ageing10, disease progression11, and clinical interventions (e.g., revascularization surgery12,13 or exercise rehabilitation14,15,16,17) in individuals with, or at risk of microvascular dysfunction.
The availability of NIRS systems has led to a rapid rise in the number of research studies reporting microvascular function18. However, differences in reactive hyperemia testing protocols, omission of detailed, repeatable NIRS methods, as well as a lack of uniformity in the description, presentation, and analysis of NIRS response parameters make comparisons across individual trials challenging. This limits the collation of data for meta-analysis and the formulation of clinical assessment recommendations9,15.
Therefore, in this article, we describe our laboratory's standardized NIRS and vascular occlusion testing protocols for the assessment of lower limb reactive hyperemia. By disseminating these methods, we aim to contribute to the improved standardization and repeatability of data collection procedures and harmonized reporting.
All methods described here have been approved by the human research ethics committee of the University of the Sunshine Coast. Furthermore, all participants gave their written informed consent to participate in the measurements outlined in this protocol. Please note, vascular occlusion testing in the lower limb is contra-indicated in individuals who have previously had a revascularization procedure involving a vascular graft or stenting of the femoral or popliteal arteries. After preparing the equipment, the participant is instructed to rest in a supine position for 10 min. At this point, NIRS data collection commences, with an initial 2 min period, allowing for stability of NIRS signals to be achieved. Baseline data are then collected for 1 min, at which point a cuff located at the thigh is promptly inflated to achieve arterial occlusion. Occlusion is maintained for 5 min before the cuff is rapidly deflated. Data collection continues throughout the reactive hyperemia period until signals have recovered to baseline. Figure 1 depicts an overview of the reactive hyperemia protocol, and the detailed steps are provided below. The equipment used for the study are listed in the Table of Materials.
Figure 1: Schematic outlining NIRS reactive hyperemia measurement protocol and timings. NIRS: near-infrared spectroscopy. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
1. Equipment preparation
NOTE: Various NIRS, cuff inflation/occlusion, and data collection systems can be used to obtain the representative results outlined below. It is important that investigators consult their own specific user manuals and are aware of unique software, calibration, ambient light, and participant/cohort-specific considerations.
2. Participant preparation
Figure 2: Example of the occlusive cuff placement at the thigh. (A) From above. (B) From the side. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Example of near-infrared spectroscopy probe position. (A) Probe attached to shaved skin at medial gastrocnemius. (B) Probe placement while ankle in foam support to allow access and ensure stability. (C) Ambient light shielding in place. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
3. Baseline data collection
4. Vascular occlusion
5. Reactive hyperemia
6. Follow up procedures
Near-infrared spectroscopy
Continuous wave near-infrared spectroscopy devices measure relative changes in oxygenated (O2Hb) and deoxygenated (HHb) hemoglobin, which reflect local O2 delivery and utilization via light-emitting sources and photodetectors, set specific distances apart. Wavelengths of light between ~700 nm and 850 nm are emitted, corresponding with the peak absorbency of O2Hb and HHb. Once near-infrared light has penetrated skeletal muscle...
This article outlines standardized procedures for the assessment of lower limb reactive hyperemia using CW-NIRS TSI to evaluate microvascular function. This protocol has been refined by examination of cuff occlusion duration on response magnitude, NIRS test-retest reliability during reactive hyperemia, as well as the level of agreement between NIRS and other methods of microvascular evaluation such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound23,24. A longer cuff-occlusion dur...
The authors have no disclosures or competing interests.
The authors would like to acknowledge Dr A. Meneses, whose previous work contributed to the refinement of the protocol described herein. Additionally, the authors would like to thank all of the research participants who have donated their time to enable protocols such as this to be developed in order to further clinical and scientific understanding.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Cuff Inflator Air Source | Hokanson | AG101 AIR SOURCE | |
Elastic Cohesive Bandage | MaxoWrap | 18228-BL | For blocking out ambient light |
OxySoft | Artinis | 3.3.341 x64 | |
PortaLite (NIRS) | Artinis | 0302-00019-00 | |
PortaSync MKII (Remote) | Artinis | 0702-00860-00 | For Marking milestones during measurement |
Rapid Cuff Inflator | Hokanson | E20 RAPID CUFF INFLATOR | |
Thigh Cuff | Hokanson | CC17 | |
Transpore Surgical Tape | 3M | 1527-1 | For fixing probe to skin |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved