A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
The novel technique presented here employs a combination of 6-Fr micro-scissors and forceps for hysteroscopic treatment of endometrial polyps, demonstrating encouraging outcomes for infertile patients afflicted with this condition.
Endometrial polyps commonly contribute to female infertility, and hysteroscopic resection is the established surgical approach for their treatment. Numerous resection methods are available, with the most used and cost-effective options being cold resection employing micro-scissors or hot resection using an electric loop. However, both methods involve sharp resection, posing a challenge in achieving complete polyp removal while avoiding damage to the uterine endometrium. To address this issue, this study proposes an innovative approach: the combined use of the 6 Fr micro-scissors and forceps under hysteroscopy. The method entails utilizing 6 Fr micro-scissors to initially remove large polyps, followed by using 6 Fr micro-forceps to extract the remaining polyp tissue expeditiously and bluntly near the basal layer of the endometrium. This approach not only prevents surgical damage to the basal layer of the endometrium but also mitigates the risk of residual polyps resulting from incomplete resection. This method is particularly suitable for women with fertility requirements, offering additional considerations for the selection of treatment options for endometrial polyp resection.
Endometrial polyps are abnormal tissue growths in the uterine lining with significant implications for fertility and reproductive health1. The estimated incidence rate of endometrial polyps is approximately 35% among patients with infertility2, though this figure may vary. These polyps can disrupt embryo implantation by inducing structural deformities in the uterine cavity and impacting the endometrium's ability to support implantation3,4,5,6. While hysteroscopic surgery is a common procedure for removing endometrial polyps, it is not without risks, with uterine perforation being the primary complication, particularly during the removal of multiple polyps7. Hysteroscopy with resectoscopes and classic mechanical resection with scissors and/or graspers remain standard for evaluating and treating the pathology of the cervical canal and endometrial cavity8. The application of electric energy during the procedure can result in endometrial damage, especially in cases involving anatomical variations such as a unicornuate uterus9. Mechanical technology such as morcellators and scissors are less painful than electrical devices when eliminating structural lesions in the office10.
In response to these challenges, a novel approach is proposed involving the combined use of micro-scissors and forceps during hysteroscopy. This technique aims to minimize the risk of injury to the endometrium, particularly the basal layer while ensuring the complete excision of polyps to enhance fertility outcomes for women. The technique is easy to learn and requires two doctors to perform the operation. Doctors with experience in hysteroscopy are capable of executing this procedure. It is a new and unique technique that eliminates thermal damage in a very common gynecologic indication.
Overall, this innovative approach presents a safer and more precise method for eliminating endometrial polyps, particularly in women with fertility concerns, offering a valuable alternative to traditional hysteroscopic procedures and potentially enhancing outcomes for patients requiring treatment for endometrial polyps.
This prospective observational study, involving outpatient hysteroscopy surgery patients, was conducted from March to December 2023. It was approved by the hospital's ethics committee of Shanghai JiAi Genetics & IVF Institute (ethics file number: JIAI E2020-09). All participants provided informed consent prior to inclusion in the study.
1. Patient selection and preparation
2. Surgical preparation
3. Surgical procedure
4. Postoperative procedures
5. Statistical analysis
A total of 114 patients suspected of having endometrial polyps based on transvaginal ultrasound findings participated in this study (Figure 4). All patients underwent hysteroscopy, with 15 patients diagnosed without endometrial polyps. The remaining 99 patients underwent endometrial polyp resection using the hysteroscopy technique. Among these 99 patients, aged between 26 and 44 years (Table 1), the average parity was 0.54 Β± 0.78, and the median diameter of endometrial ...
Our research presents a novel surgical technique for removing endometrial polyps without cutting or causing electrical damage to the uterine endometrium, which is especially beneficial for women with fertility concerns. Sharon et al. introduced a similar technique using a non-electric loop for polyp excision11, demonstrating its efficacy and safety. However, the traditional resectoscope has a larger diameter12, necessitating cervical dilation and potentially increasing the ...
The authors declare no competing interests.
We express our gratitude to the patients, surgeons, anesthesiologists, scrub nurses, and technicians who actively participated in this study. Without their cooperation, this research would not have been possible.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Grasping Forceps | ShenDa | X5164B | |
Hysteroscope Lens | ShenDa | J0122A | |
Hysteroscopic Infusion Set | ShenDa | T7511Β | |
IMAGE 1 S CONNECT | KARL STORZ | TC200 | |
IMAGE1 HD | KARL STORZ | H3-Z | |
IMAGE1 S H3-LINK | KARL STORZ | TC300 | |
Monitor | NDS surgical imaging, LLC | N-90X0568-G | |
Optical Cable | ShenDa | U8724 | |
Scissors | ShenDa | X5261AΒ | |
Sealing Cap | ShenDa | T7303 | |
Uterine Balloon Dilator | ShenDa | U9522 DG-1 | |
XENON NOVA 300 | KARL STORZ | 201340 20 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved