A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Not Published
Drosophila locomotor activity is a robust and quantitative measurement of circadian photo-responses. We describe protocols for designing behavior experiments for circadian photo-responses and analyzing the data. Studying the circadian photo-responses is important for dissecting the neuronal and molecular mechanisms of light entrainment.
Circadian rhythms are only beneficial to animals if they can be synchronized by changes of ambient conditions. Light and temperature are two dominant environmental parameters that synchronize animal circadian clocks. In Drosophila circadian photo-responses are mediated by a solely blue light photoreceptor named CRYPTOCHROME (CRY). Upon photoreception, CRY changes its conformation and initiates the proteosomal dependent degradation of TIMELESS (TIM). TIM is an important pacemaker protein, thus degradation of TIM will reset the circadian clock. Under constant light conditions (LL), wild type flies quickly become arrhythmic because of the constant degradation of TIM, while flies bearing defects with circadian photo-responses will still be rhythmic. Thus LL triggered arrhythmicity has been used for screening of components in circadian light input pathways. A brief short light pulse in the night can also dramatically shift phases of circadian rhythms. As expected, this phase shift response is reduced in flied with defects in circadian photoresponse. Thus analyzing locomotion behavior rhythmicity under LL or phase changes after short light pulse in constant darkness (DD) are two major methods to study circadian photoresponse. Here we describe how to design and analyze LL and phase response experiments. LL arrhythmicity is suitable for screening light input pathways mutants, whereas phase response validates the results and provide further information for light sensitivity.
Most organisms, from cyanobacteria to mammals, use circadian clocks to anticipate daily environmental changes. Circadian clocks synchronize most bodily functions of animals, from metabolic level, to rest/activity cycles and other behaviors1. Circadian rhythms are self-sustained, which can be maintained even in constant conditions for several days. Circadian rhythm is generated by a molecular pacemaker, which is highly conserved among organisms. In fruit flies, the core of this circadian clock, is a transcriptional-translational feedback loop2,3. Two transcription factors, CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) form a heterodimer and generate rhythmic transcriptions of down stream clock controlled genes. Among these genes, PERIOD (PER) and TIM are two main transcriptional repressors. PER/TIM undergo post-translational modifications, and accumulate in the cytoplasm, then enter the nucleus to repress their own transcription by blocking CLK activity.
Circadian pacemakers are self-sustained, but environmental cues determine their phase of oscillations. Light and temperature are the most crucial cues for synchronization of the circadian clock4. Compared to temperature, entrainment by light is much better understood. Circadian photo-responses are mainly mediated by CRY input pathways in flies. CRY is the blue light photoreceptor, which changes its conformation after receiving light, and then it is able to bind TIM5,6. After binding with CRY, TIM undergoes proteosomal dependent degradation through E3 ubiquitin ligase JETLAG7-9 (JET). Thus, the degradation of TIM resets the circadian pacemaker.
Flies become arrhythmic in constant light conditions, because of the constant degradation of TIM by CRY. However flies with defects in the CRY pathway still remain rhythmic. Based on this observation, the behavioral rhythmicity in LL is often used to demonstrate circadian photo-responses in flies. A short light pulse in the night will cause transient degradation of TIM, thus shifting the phase of circadian pacemaker5,6. Light pulse at early night will mimic a delayed day, thus called phase delay; while a light pulse at late night will mimic an advanced dawn, which is named as phase advance. This phase response is sensitive to light intensity, which is an important parameter for circadian photo-responses. Phase response is almost abolished in mutants of CRY input pathways. Measuring the phase response by light pulse is also extensively used to examine circadian photo-responses. Here we describe how to perform these two experiments as well as methods to analyze the behavior data.
1. Constant light (LL) Experiments
2. Phase responses Experiments
NOTE: The major part of preparation of this phase response experiment is the same as LL, except the behavior program and data analysis. Here we will only describe in detail the steps that diverge between the two experiments.
Under constant light, wild type flies become arrhythmic because of constant degradation of TIM, while circadian photo-response mutants remain rhythmic. Figure 1 shows behavior actograms of flies under constant light. The results can also be presented in a quantitative manner. Table 1 shows the percentage of rhythmic flies, and period in constant light. Normally, very few wild type flies show rhythmicity (0-25%), while majority of flies with defects in circadian photo-response remains rhyt...
Circadian rhythms exist in most organisms on earth. Animals utilize circadian clocks to coordinate their bodily functions with daily changes. Since environmental conditions are variable, the circadian clock is only beneficial if it can be adjusted by different changes. For flies, light is the primary environmental cue used to synchronize and shift the circadian clock. Studying circadian photo-response is important for understanding how light is processed and regulates circadian behavior. Disruptions of circadian rhyth...
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
This work was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20 GM103650, and the University of Nevada Reno. We thank Matthew Gruner and three anonymous reviewers for critically reading the manuscript and helpful comments.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Percival Scientific | I-36LL | ||
Trikinetics | DAM2 | activity monitor-2 | |
Trikinetics | PGT5 | autoclavable | |
Trikinetics | DAMSystem308 | free download | |
Trikinetics | DAMFileScan110X | activity monitor-2 software | |
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique | Data analysis, Rouyer lab | ||
Fishersci | S2-500GM | making fly food for behavior | |
BD Biosciences | 214010 | making fly food for behavior |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved