A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

Here we present a protocol to lyse cyanobacteria and green algae single cells that allows for subsequent single-cell whole genome amplification in a microfluidic platform with a 100% success rate.

Abstract

Single-cell sequencing is becoming popular for analyzing the genome of a single cell within a heterogenous cell population. It often relies on microfluidic tools to perform single cell isolation and nanoscale chemical reactions to lyse the cell and amplify its genome. However, single-cell sequencing has mainly been applied to human cells and certain bacterial species that are easy to lyse. It is still rare to use single-cell sequencing in environmental studies, as many species of vital environmental significance such as cyanobacterial and green algal species have complex and rigid cell wall structures. To extend single-cell sequencing to these hard-to-lyse species, it is essential to develop an effective lysis method compatible with microfluidic tools and amplification chemistry. Here, we present a lysis method proven effective for cyanobacterial and green algal species for subsequent microfluidic-based single-cell whole genome sequencing (SC-WGA). The protocol combines thermal and chemical lysis mechanisms and has achieved >25 ng DNA for 100% of the single cells after on-chip amplification. Nostoc was chosen as a cyanobacterial model for the protocol development. The optimized protocol was directly applied to Gloeocapsa, another cyanobacterial species, and Sphaerocystis, a eukaryotic green alga, without modifications and achieved a 100% success rate.

Introduction

Single-cell whole genome sequencing (SC-WGS) has been popular for studying the genetic heterogeneity of complex cell communities on a cellular level1,2,3. Generally, SC-WGS requires single-cell isolation, lysis, and amplifying the femtograms to picograms of genomic DNA to generate enough DNA for standard library preparation (>25 ng)4,5. Microfluidics is an ideal tool for SC-WGA, as it handles nanoscale of fluid precisely6,7,8,9,10,11,12, permitting single cell isolation into microchambers for lysis and genome amplification13,14. Multiple displacement amplification (MDA)15 has been a common chemistry technique in microfluidic-based SC-WGA. It uses φ29 DNA polymerase and random primers to produce copies of template DNA with relatively high fidelity and low error rates, and it is easy to implement in most microfluidic systems16,17,18.

So far, SC-WGS has been mostly performed on human cells, as they can be simply lysed and processed following most SC-WGA kit instructions. Bacterial SC-WGA is more challenging due to rigid and multi-layered cell walls19 and 1000x less the amount of starting DNA20. Even so, efforts have been directed to bacterial SC-WGA, as these microorganisms21 are being increasingly recognized as critical factors in human microbiome22,23. However, SC-WGS is still rare in species significant to environmental studies including cyanobacteria24,25 and green algae26,27 due to complex and thick cell structures that are often enveloped in extracellular matrix and thus hard to lyse.

Standard methods for mechanically disrupting rigid species such as bead-beating, sonication, and lyophilization are not compatible with microfluidic tools28. Chemical lysis is better suited for SC-WGA in microfluidics; however, common chemical lysis agents such as sodium dodecyl sulfate and sarkosyl have substantial deleterious effect on polymerase activities in MDA chemistry29. Other effective chemicals including phenol and spermine are toxic and need to be used in a fume hood; thus, they are not generally applicable in microfluidics19. Freeze-thawing followed by alkaline treatment is efficient for cyanobacteria lysis for SC-WGA in well plates30, but it requires placing the plates in a -80 °C freezer for 1 h and thus is not implementable in microfluidic systems with various control units.

A common alternative is to pre-lyse a cyanobacterial or green algal cell population in-tube using ionic surfactants followed by wash steps before injecting the cell suspension into microfluidic chips29, 31. However, this approach is not applicable for cells in low abundance and will likely release DNA from the bulk cell into the extracellular milieu, leading to contamination in the SC-WGA step. Multi-round amplification is another common option when cells cannot be sufficiently lysed, but it often leads to increased bias in the sequencing data.

To enable SC-WGA for cyanobacterial and green algal cells without the aforementioned concerns, present here is a method effective for the lysis of single cyanobacterial and green algal cells for subsequent MDA-based SC-WGA in microfluidic devices, which generates >25 ng of genomic DNA per cell. This approach is based on three major cell lysis methods including thermal30,32,33, enzymatic34,35, and chemical lysis36,37,38. In this work, the species Nostoc was used as a model because of substantial lysis difficulties encountered in earlier studies as a cyanobacterial species19,39. Its cell wall primarily consists of an external layer of exopolysaccharide and polymerized proteins, outer membrane, thick peptidoglycan layer, and inner cytoplasmic membrane40. Our lysis method was designed to systematically degrade these cells from their outermost to innermost layers without suppressing MDA chemistry. This protocol was tested on another cyanobacterial species, Gloeocapsa, and green algal species (Chlorophyta) Sphaerocystis, whose cell wall is often composed of microfibrillar polysaccharides and enveloped in polysaccharides41,42. Despite the existence of various novel high-throughput microfluidic-based single cell isolation technologies such as droplet-based fluorescent-activated cell sorting13 and in-gel single cell trapping in virtual microfludics43, laser tweezers were chosen for single cell trapping and transport due to its higher precision and single-cell confidence, which is especially important for isolating target cells in samples with complex components. 100% success was achieved for all three species following the optimized protocol without further efforts. We believe that this effective lysis method may enable SC-WGA of cyanobacterial and green algal cells in microfluidics for a wide range of single cell genomic studies in environmental research.

Protocol

1. Preparation of desiccated cell species (Nostoc, Gloeocapsa, Sphaerocystis)

  1. Add 300 µL of sample diluent [0.08% poloxamer 407 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)] to 2 mL tubes that contain desiccated samples of Nostoc, Gloeocapsa, and Sphaerocystis, respectively, to re-suspend the cells.
    NOTE: The desiccated samples can be identified visually in the tube as particles before re-suspension and are aggregated to the bottom of the tube after addition of the sample diluent.
  2. Agitate the cells clusters of Nostoc in the tube with a micro-pestling tool for 10 s.
  3. Repeat step 1.2 until the Nostoc is fully suspended and the suspension looks cloudy without visible large particles.
  4. Agitate the cells clusters of Gloeocapsa in the tube with a micro-pestling tool for 20 s.
  5. Repeat step 1.4 until the Gloeocapsa is fully suspended and the suspension looks cloudy without visible large particles.
  6. Place the tube that contains Sphaerocystis in a water bath sonicator for 1 min.
  7. Repeat step 1.6 until the Sphaerocystis is fully suspended and the suspension looks cloudy without large particles.

2. Lysis buffer preparation

  1. Add 1 µL of 10 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, pH 8.0), 1 µL of 40 KU/µL lysozyme, and 40 µL of 1 M dithiothreitol (DTT) to 158 µL of nuclease-free water in a 0.5 mL tube.
  2. Mix by briefly vortexing and make 10 aliquots of 20 µL in 0.2 mL PCR tubes, then store in a -20 °C refrigerator.

3. Set-up of microfluidic device for single cell experiment

  1. Take a microfluidic device microfabricated using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) according to the procedure described in our previous work21. Place it in a Petri dish and transfer it to a UV hood for 45 min for sterilization.
    NOTE: The device consists of a flow channel layer on the top and control channel layer on the bottom separated by a thin PDMS membrane. The samples are introduced into the device and reactions are performed in the flow channels, and the control channels are used for exerting positive pressure to form microvalves. Each device has 10 parallel reaction lines for experimental reactions and two reaction lines for negative controls (Figure 1A).
  2. Inject 0.4 mL of de-ionized water into the tube of the pneumatic control system using a 1 mL syringe. Set the pressure of pneumatic control system to 25 psi by turning the knob on the first regulator of the pneumatic control unit that connects to a house gas outlet.
  3. Quickly close and open the valve that connects to the tube in the pneumatic control system via the microfluidic graphic user interface (GUI) to remove all the air at the end of the tube.
  4. Connect the end of the tube via a bent cannula to the corresponding control channel inlet port on the microfluidic device. Close the microvalves via a microfluidic GUI for the de-ionized water to exert positive pressure on the microfluidic valve membranes (Figure 1B).
  5. Repeat steps 3.2 and 3.3 with another tube in the pneumatic control system until all the relevant tubes are connected to the microfluidic device.
  6. Wait 10-15 min until the control channels in the microfluidic device are filled with de-ionized water. Place the microfluidic chip under the microscope and observe the control channels using a 10x objective to ensure that there are no air plugs in the control channels.
  7. Inject 0.4 mL of chip diluent (0.04% poloxamer 407 in PBS) into a connected tube set using a 1 mL syringe. Connect the tube set to a microfluidic manifold that connects to a port on the pneumatic control unit.
  8. Set the pressure of the pneumatic control system to 2–5 psi by turning the knob on the second regulator of the pneumatic control unit. Insert a bent cannula at the end of the tube.
  9. Quickly close and open the valve that connects to the tube in the pneumatic control system via the microfluidic GUI to remove all the air at the end of the tube. Insert the tube into the reagent port on the microfluidic device via the bent cannula.
  10. Insert a short tube via a bent cannula at the sample inlet and outlet ports respectively on the microfluidic device. Open the reagent gate, sample inlet gate, and sample outlet gate by clicking on corresponding buttons in the microfluidic GUI.
  11. Introduce the chip diluent into the sample channel through the reagent inlet port by pressurizing the tubing at 2–5 psi via the second regulator in the pneumatic control system, until fluid exits the short tubes at the sample inlet and outlet ports.
  12. Close all gates via microfluidic GUI and wait 30 min prior to experiments to prevent the cells from sticking to the PDMS channel surface during the cell sorting.
    NOTE: The protocol can be paused here.

4. Cell sorting in microfluidic device using laser tweezers

  1. Pipette 10 µL of the cell suspension of Nostoc, Gloeocapsa, or Sphaerocystis made in steps 1.3, 1.5, or 1.6, respectively, using a gel-loading pipette tip. Insert the pipette tip into a new tube and inject the cell suspension followed by inserting a bent cannula.
    NOTE: The cell suspension should look cloudy with no large clusters in the tube.
  2. Disconnect the short tube from the sample inlet port. Insert the tube with cell suspension into the sample channel port via the bent cannula.
  3. Open the gates of sample inlet and outlet via the microfluidic GUI and pressurizing the tubing at 2–5 psi via the second regulator of the pneumatic control system. Check under a 60x objective to ensure that there are visually identifiable target cells in the sample channel.
    NOTE: Nostoc, Gloeocapsa, or Sphaerocystis can be distinguished visually from common contaminations such as Escherichia coli based on size and morphology.
  4. Center the microfluidic device on the microscope stage and tighten the screws on the clamps to ensure proper contact between the bottom coverslip of the microfluidic device and the objective.
  5. Place a laser warning sign on the outside of the door and close the door. Put on laser protection goggles. Turn on the laser tweezers system power supply and software, and close all the interlocks required to ensure safety during laser operation.
  6. Turn on the laser beam and shutter through the software. Adjust the power bar in the software to trap and move the cells around to ensure laser trapping functionality. Start with low power and increase the power if necessary.
  7. Trap a target cell by turning on the laser beam and shutter through the laser tweezer software. Move it to the entrance of a closed cell isolation chamber using the motorized microscopic stage controller according to the real-time microscopic view displayed via the laser tweezer software (Figure 1C).
  8. Open the gate of the chamber via a microfluidic GUI and move the cell inside of the chamber as described in step 4.7.
  9. Move any visually identifiable contaminating cells from the chamber. Turn off the shutter of the laser beam to release the cell, then close the gate of the chamber via microfluidic GUI.
  10. Repeat steps 4.7–4.9 to isolate more single cells into separate chambers.
  11. After the cell sorting is completed, turn off the laser beam and shutter, close the software window, and shut down the laser power supply.
    CAUTION: Laser protection goggles must be worn at all times during laser operating. Make sure that all interlocks are closed before turning on the laser beam.

5. SC-WGA in microfluidic device

  1. Disconnect the tubes from the sample channel inlet and outlet ports and insert a new set of short tubes into these ports via bent cannula. Change the microscope objective to 10x and prepare for cell lysis and genome amplification. The overview of the process is illustrated in Figure 3.
  2. Remove the microfluidic device from the microscope stage and place it on a cold block that has been stored in -20 °C for 1 min, remove the device from the cold block, and place it onto a 65 °C hot plate for 1 min. Repeat the cold-heat cycle 3x.
  3. Open the reagent gate, then sample the inlet and outlet gates via the microfluidic GUI, pressurizing the reagent tubing at 2–5 psi via the pneumatic control system to flush out redundant cells in the channels using chip diluent for 3 min.
  4. Close all gates via the microfluidic GUI and disconnect the tubes from the sample channel inlet and outlet ports, then insert a new set of tubes.
  5. Take a 20 µL aliquot of customized lysis buffer and thaw on ice. Add 3.5 µL of 10% polysorbate 20 to the lysis buffer. Mix by briefly vortexing and spin down on a microcentrifuge.
  6. Disconnect the tube from the reagent port. Pipette 20 µL of customized lysis buffer using a gel-loading pipette tip.
  7. Insert the pipette tip into a new tube and inject the buffer, then insert a bent cannula into the tube. Connect the tube to the microfluidic manifold that connects to a port on the pneumatic control unit.
  8. Insert the tube with customized lysis buffer into the reagent port on the microfluidic device via a bent cannula. Open the reagent gate via the microfluidic GUI while pressurizing the tube at 2–5 psi via the pneumatic control unit.
  9. Open the sample inlet and outlet gates briefly to flush the channel and close these gates. Check under the microscope to ensure all air bubbles are removed.
  10. Open the cell isolation gate and lysis chamber 1 gate via the microfluidic GUI until the lysis buffer fills the lysis chamber 1. Close all gates via the GUI and move the microfluidic chip to a hot plate set at 37 °C and keep the chip on the hot plate for 2 h.
  11. Use tape to stick the bottom of the device to the surface of the hot plate to maximize contact between the device and hot plate. Prepare for the introduction of reagents into the microfluidic device for reactions. The overview of the process is illustrated in Figure 1D.
  12. Take a 20 µL aliquot of D2 lysis buffer (alkaline lysis buffer) from the -20 °C block and thaw on ice. Add 3.5 µL of 50% polysorbate 20 to the D2 lysis buffer. Mix by briefly vortexing and spin down on a microcentrifuge.
  13. Pipette 20 µL of D2 lysis buffer using a gel-loading pipette tip. Insert the pipette tip into a new tube and inject the buffer followed by inserting a bent cannula into the tube.
  14. Remove the microfluidic chip from the hot plate to the microscope stage. Disconnect the tube from the reagent port.
  15. Insert the tube with D2 lysis buffer into the reagent port on the microfluidic device via a bent cannula. Connect the tube set to a microfluidic manifold that connects to a port on the pneumatic control unit.
  16. Open the reagent gate via microfluidic GUI and pressurizing the tube at 2-5 psi via pneumatic control unit. Open the sample inlet and outlet gates briefly to flush the channel and close these gates. Check under the microscope to ensure all air bubbles are removed.
  17. Open the cell isolation gate, lysis chamber 1 gate, and lysis chamber 2 gate until the D2 lysis buffer fills lysis chamber 2 as observed under the microscope. Close all gates and place the microfluidic chip to a hot plate set at 37 °C and keep the chip on the hot plate for 2 h.
  18. Use tape to stick the bottom of the device to the surface of the hot plate to maximize contact between the device and hot plate.
  19. Take a 20 µL aliquot of neutralization buffer from the -20 °C block and thaw at room temperature (RT). Briefly vortex and spin down on a microcentrifuge.
  20. Pipette 20 µL of neutralization buffer using a gel-loading pipette tip. Insert the pipette tip into a new tube and inject the buffer followed by inserting a bent cannula into the tube.
  21. Remove the microfluidic chip from the hot plate to the microscope stage. Disconnect the tube from the reagent port.
  22. Insert the tube with neutralization buffer into the reagent port on the microfluidic device via a bent cannula. Connect the tube to the microfluidic manifold that connects to a port on the pneumatic control unit.
  23. Open the reagent gate while pressurizing the tube at 2–5 psi. Open the sample inlet and outlet gates briefly to flush the channel, then close the gates. Check under the microscope to ensure all air bubbles are removed.
  24. Open the cell isolation gate, lysis chamber 1 gate, and lysis chamber 2 gate, then stop the buffer gate until neutralization buffer fills the stop buffer chamber as observed under the microscope. Close all gates and incubate the chip at RT for 10 min on the microscope stage.
  25. Take a 2 µL aliquot of DNA polymerase, 29 µL aliquot of reaction buffer, and 9 µL aliquot of nuclease-free water from the -20 °C block, then thaw on ice. Add 29 µL of reaction buffer to 9 µL of nuclease-free water, briefly vortex, and spin down on a microcentrifuge.
  26. Add 2 µL of DNA polymerase to the mixture, briefly vortex and spin down on a microcentrifuge. Add 10 µL of 25% glycerol into the mixture, briefly vortex, and spin down on a microcentrifuge and keep on ice.
  27. Pipette 20 µL of the prepared DNA polymerase using a gel-loading pipette tip. Insert the pipette tip into a new tube and inject the buffer followed by inserting a bent cannula into the tube.
  28. Remove the microfluidic chip from the hot plate to the microscope stage. Disconnect the tube from the reagent port. Insert the tube with prepared DNA polymerase into the reagent port on the microfluidic device via a bent cannula.
  29. Connect the tube to the microfluidic manifold that connects to a port on the pneumatic control unit. Open the reagent gate via the microfluidic GUI while pressurizing the tube at 2–5 psi via the second regulator in the pneumatic control unit.
  30. Open the sample inlet and outlet gates briefly to flush the channel and close the gates. Check under the microscope to ensure all air bubbles are removed.
  31. Open the cell isolation gate, lysis chamber 1 gate, lysis chamber 2 gate, stopping buffer gate, and reaction chamber gate until reaction buffer mixture fills the reaction chamber as observed under the microscope. Close all gates and move the microfluidic chip to a hot plate set at 32 °C for 16 h.
  32. Use tape to stick the bottom of the device to the surface of the hot plate to maximize contact between the device and hot plate.

6. Collecting on-chip SC-WGA products

  1. Incubate the microfluidic device on a hot plate set at 65 °C for 3 min to terminate the reaction. Add 10 µL of polysorbate 20 to a 1.5 mL tube of nuclease-free water.
  2. Use a 1 mL sterile syringe to aspirate 0.5 mL of nuclease-free water from the 1.5 mL tube and inject it into a new tube set. Connect the tube set to the microfluidic manifold that connects to a port on the pneumatic control unit.
  3. Remove the microfluidic chip from the hot plate to the microscope stage. Disconnect the tube from the reagent port.
  4. Insert the tube with nuclease-free water into the reagent port on the microfluidic chip via the cannula. Open the reagent gate while pressurizing the tube at 2–5 psi via the second regulator pneumatic control system.
  5. Open the sample inlet and outlet gates to flush the channel for 3 min and close the gates. Check under the microscope to ensure all air bubbles are removed.
  6. Insert 20 µL gel-loading pipette tips into all product outlet ports on the microfluidic device. Open all gates except the sample inlet and outlet gates so that the nuclease-free water flushes the amplified product out of the chip and into the pipette tips.
  7. Take out the pipette tips and transfer the fluid with a pipette to 0.2 mL PCR tubes. Perform a DNA quantification assay to measure the amount of DNA in each sample amplified from a single cell.
  8. Store the samples in -20 °C for long-term storage until sequencing.

Results

The protocol was developed in our optofluidic platform at the Mayo Clinic21. This platform consists of a microscope, optical tweezers, and microfluidic chip that support the serial addition of reagents (Figure 1A-D). Figure 2 illustrates the cell wall structures of the cyanobacterial and green algal species tested using the protocol. Figure 3 shows the overall...

Discussion

During the process of single cell isolation in a microfluidic device using laser tweezers, it is essential to ensure that no undesired cells are in the cell isolation chambers prior to adding lysis buffers. Undesired cells should be moved out of the chamber to minimize contaminating DNA caused by these cells. Earlier studies have shown that lasers with wavelength between 1250 nm and 1550 nm with 100 mW power can increase the temperature and rupture the cell membrane44. However, other evidence has ...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the following sources: Marina Walther-Antonio and Yuguang Liu acknowledge The Ivan Bowen Family Foundation and CTSA Grant Number KL2 TR002379 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Dirk Schulze-Makuch and Jean-Pierre de Vera acknowledge support from ERC Advanced Grant "HOME" (#339231). In addition, Jean-Pierre de Vera acknowledges support from ESA for the BIOMEX project (ESA-ILSRA 2009-0834) and DLR for the DLR-FuW-Project BIOMEX (2474128). Charles S. Cockell was supported by the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), Grant No. ST/M001261/1.

We thank the Mayo Clinic Microbiome Program and the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine for support. We also thank Minnesota Nano Center at the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis, MN, USA) and Dr. Alexander Revzin at Mayo Clinic for granting us access to their microfabrication facilities.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
DTTBio-rad1610611
EDTAThermo Fisher15575020pH 8.0
LysozymeEpicentreR1804M
MATLABmicrofluidic user interface
MicroscopeNikonEclipse/Ti
Nuclease-free waterThermo FisherAM9938
Optical TweezersThorlabsOTM 211
PBSThermo Fisher10010023pH 7.4
PDMSDow CoringSylgard 184
Pluronic F-127Sigma Aldrich9003116
Single cell WGA kitQiagen150343Include D2 buffer and neutralization buffer
TapestationAgilent2200
Tween 20Sigma Aldrich9005-64-5

References

  1. Stepanauskas, R. Single cell genomics: an individual look at microbes. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 15 (5), 613-620 (2012).
  2. Gawad, C., Koh, W., Quake, S. R. Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science. Nature Reviews Genetics. 17 (3), 175-188 (2016).
  3. Blainey, P. C. The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 37 (3), 407-427 (2013).
  4. Kalisky, T., Quake, S. R. Single-cell genomics. Nature Methods. 8 (4), 311-314 (2011).
  5. Zhang, L., et al. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 89 (13), 5847-5851 (1992).
  6. Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature. 442 (7101), 368-373 (2006).
  7. Teh, S. -. Y., Lin, R., Hung, L. -. H., Lee, A. P. Droplet microfluidics. Lab on a Chip. 8 (2), 198-220 (2008).
  8. Siddiqui, S., Tufenkji, N., Moraes, C. Microfluidics in microbiology: putting a magnifying glass on microbes. Integrative Biology. 8 (9), 914-917 (2016).
  9. Sackmann, E. K., Fulton, A. L., Beebe, D. J. The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature. 507 (7491), 181-189 (2014).
  10. Lagus, T. P., Edd, J. F. A review of the theory, methods and recent applications of high-throughput single-cell droplet microfluidics. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 46 (11), 114005 (2013).
  11. Autebert, J., et al. Microfluidic: an innovative tool for efficient cell sorting. Methods. 57 (3), 297-307 (2012).
  12. Liu, Y., Walther-Antonio, M. Microfluidics: A new tool for microbial single cell analyses in human microbiome studies. Biomicrofluidics. 11 (6), 061501 (2017).
  13. Mazutis, L., et al. Single-cell analysis and sorting using droplet-based microfluidics. Nature Protocols. 8 (5), 870-891 (2013).
  14. Landry, Z. C., Giovanonni, S. J., Quake, S. R., Blainey, P. C. Optofluidic cell selection from complex microbial communities for single-genome analysis. Methods in Enzymology. 531, (2013).
  15. Dean, F. B., Nelson, J. R., Giesler, T. L., Lasken, R. S. Rapid amplification of plasmid and phage DNA using phi29 DNA polymerase and multiply-primed rolling circle amplification. Genome Research. 11 (6), 1095-1099 (2001).
  16. Marcy, Y., et al. Nanoliter reactors improve multiple displacement amplification of genomes from single cells. PLoS Genetics. 3 (9), e155 (2007).
  17. Zare, R. N., Kim, S. Microfluidic platforms for single-cell analysis. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 12, 187-201 (2010).
  18. Binga, E. K., Lasken, R. S., Neufeld, J. D. Something from (almost) nothing: the impact of multiple displacement amplification on microbial ecology. The ISME Journal. 2 (3), 233-241 (2008).
  19. Mehta, K. K., Evitt, N. H., Swartz, J. R. Chemical lysis of cyanobacteria. Journal of Biological Engineering. 9 (1), 10 (2015).
  20. Brown, L., Wolf, J. M., Prados-Rosales, R., Casadevall, A. Through the wall: extracellular vesicles in Gram-positive bacteria, mycobacteria and fungi. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 13 (10), 620-630 (2015).
  21. Liu, Y., et al. The Development of an Effective Bacterial Single-Cell Lysis Method Suitable for Whole Genome Amplification in Microfluidic Platforms. Micromachines. 9 (8), 367 (2018).
  22. Walther-António, M. R., et al. Pregnancy's stronghold on the vaginal microbiome. PloS One. 9 (6), e98514 (2014).
  23. Walther-António, M. R., et al. Potential contribution of the uterine microbiome in the development of endometrial cancer. Genome Medicine. 8 (1), 122 (2016).
  24. Potts Whitton, B. A., M, Introduction to the cyanobacteria. Ecology of Cyanobacteria II. , 1-13 (2012).
  25. Whitton, B. A., Potts, M. . The ecology of cyanobacteria: their diversity in time and space. , (2007).
  26. Demirbas, A., Demirbas, M. F. Importance of algae oil as a source of biodiesel. Energy Conversion and Management. 52 (1), 163-170 (2011).
  27. El Gamal, A. A. Biological importance of marine algae. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 18 (1), 1-25 (2010).
  28. Kim, I. S., Nguyen, G. H., Kim, S., Lee, J., Yu, H. -. W. Evaluation of methods for cyanobacterial cell lysis and toxin (microcystin-LR) extraction using chromatographic and mass spectrometric analyses. Environmental Engineering Research. 14 (4), 250-254 (2009).
  29. Hall, E. W., Kim, S., Appadoo, V., Zare, R. N. Lysis of a single cyanobacterium for whole genome amplification. Micromachines. 4 (3), 321-332 (2013).
  30. He, J., Du, S., Tan, X., Arefin, A., Han, C. S. METHOD SUMMARY. Biotechniques. 60 (3), 129-135 (2016).
  31. Davison, M., Hall, E., Zare, R., Bhaya, D. Challenges of metagenomics and single-cell genomics approaches for exploring cyanobacterial diversity. Photosynthesis Research. 126 (1), 135-146 (2015).
  32. Rees, P., Watson, J., Cumming, R., Liddell, J., Turner, P. Effects of heat shock on gram negative bacteria: use of lysis by sodium dodecyl sulphate as a probe for the integrity of DNA. Bioseparation. 6 (2), 125-132 (1996).
  33. Kvist, T., Ahring, B. K., Lasken, R. S., Westermann, P. Specific single-cell isolation and genomic amplification of uncultured microorganisms. Applied Microbiology. 74 (4), 926-935 (2007).
  34. Salazar, O., Asenjo, J. A. Enzymatic lysis of microbial cells. Biotechnology Letters. 29 (7), 985-994 (2007).
  35. Yuan, S., Cohen, D. B., Ravel, J., Abdo, Z., Forney, L. J. Evaluation of methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from the human microbiome. PloS One. 7 (3), e33865 (2012).
  36. Cloninger, C., Felton, M., Paul, B., Hirakawa, Y., Metzenberg, S. Control of pH during plasmid preparation by alkaline lysis of Escherichia coli. Analytical Biochemistry. 378 (2), 224-225 (2008).
  37. Listwan, P., et al. The optimization of in vitro high-throughput chemical lysis of Escherichia coli. Application to ACP domain of the polyketide synthase ppsC from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics. 11 (1), 41-49 (2010).
  38. Grindberg, R. V., et al. Single cell genome amplification accelerates identification of the apratoxin biosynthetic pathway from a complex microbial assemblage. PLoS One. 6 (4), e18565 (2011).
  39. Wu, X., Zarka, A., Boussiba, S. A simplified protocol for preparing DNA from filamentous cyanobacteria. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 18 (4), 385-392 (2000).
  40. Hoiczyk, E., Hansel, A. Cyanobacterial cell walls: news from an unusual prokaryotic envelope. Journal of Bacteriology. 182 (5), 1191-1199 (2000).
  41. Domozych, D. S. Algal cell walls. eLS. , (2011).
  42. Nicolai, E., Preston, R. Cell-wall studies in the Chlorophyceae. I. A general survey of submicroscopic structure in filamentous species. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. , 244-274 (1952).
  43. Xu, L., Brito, I. L., Alm, E. J., Blainey, P. C. Virtual microfluidics for digital quantification and single-cell sequencing. Nature Methods. 13 (9), 759 (2016).
  44. Dhawan, M. D., Wise, F., Baeumner, A. J. Development of a laser-induced cell lysis system. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 374 (3), 421-426 (2002).
  45. Neuman, K. C., Chadd, E. H., Liou, G. F., Bergman, K., Block, S. M. Characterization of photodamage to Escherichia coli in optical traps. Biophysical Journal. 77 (5), 2856-2863 (1999).
  46. Ericsson, M., Hanstorp, D., Hagberg, P., Enger, J., Nyström, T. Sorting out bacterial viability with optical tweezers. Journal of Bacteriology. 182 (19), 5551-5555 (2000).
  47. Froger, A., Hall, J. E. Transformation of plasmid DNA into E. coli using the heat shock method. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (6), (2007).
  48. Griese, M., Lange, C., Soppa, J. Ploidy in cyanobacteria. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 323 (2), 124-131 (2011).
  49. Nichols, H. W. Polyploidy in algae. Polyploidy. , 151-161 (1980).
  50. Kim, S., et al. High-throughput automated microfluidic sample preparation for accurate microbial genomics. Nature Communications. 8, 13919 (2017).
  51. Kim, H., et al. Automated digital microfluidic sample preparation for next-generation DNA sequencing. Journal of the Association for Laboratory Automation. 16 (6), 405-414 (2011).
  52. Kim, H., et al. A microfluidic DNA library preparation platform for next-generation sequencing. PLoS One. 8 (7), e68988 (2013).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Plant cellbacterialmicrobialmultiple displacement amplificationcell lysissingle cell

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved