A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol describes a method to determine the influence of ryegrass residue addition on soil organic matter mineralization (i.e., priming effect) as well as explore the changes in soil microbial biomass size induced by soil organic matter priming, which involves artificially changing the size of microbial biomass.

Abstract

Soil microbial biomass is of great importance for soil organic matter (SOM) and residue decomposition. The effects of soil microbial biomass size (MBS) on SOM mineralization are still unclear, especially regarding mineralization in the presence of fresh plant residue input, known as the priming effect (PE). A traditional approach to determining this influence is the collection of soils with contrasting MBS, determination of the SOM mineralization rate, and further exploration of the relationships between MBS and SOM mineralization. In this protocol, the initial MBS is artificially changed in a preliminary experiment. Afterwards, the response of SOM priming with plant residue applications is estimated. Also presented is a detailed protocol for changing the initial size of microbial biomass as well as the determination of residue decomposition and SOM priming. The protocol includes six main steps: sample preparation, determination of optimal glucose level to increase MBS, preincubation experiment, confirmation of MBS changes, incubation experiment, and determination of PE and residue decomposition. The advantage of this methodology is that the relationships between the initial size of soil microbial biomass and SOM priming and plant residue decomposition are easily tested by altering microbial biomass artificially in a preincubation setting. This avoids potential confounding influence on the relationships by other factors, such as various soil nutrients or textures of different soils used in the traditional method.

Introduction

Despite accounting for a small fraction of soil organic matter (SOM)1, microbial biomass plays a critical role in SOM and plant residue decomposition, and it significantly affects SOM dynamics and pools. Previous studies have shown that microbial communities are of great importance in the process of SOM and residue decomposition2,3,4. However, the influence of soil microbial biomass size (MBS) on residue decomposition, especially SOM mineralization as affected by residue addition (the priming effect, [PE]), is still unclear. For example, similar SOM mineralization rates as affected by the supply of fresh plant residue were observed among soils with different soil MBS5. A lack of relationship between soil MBS and SOM priming has also been reported6,7. These inconsistent observations are likely results of many other confounded factors, such as soil carbon and nutrient contents from the different soils that are selected8. In these studies, it is difficult to regulate the size of soil microbial biomass to test its influence on SOM mineralization. Similar difficulties have occurred in testing the effects of soil MBS on other soil processes.

This protocol describes a method to alter the initial size of soil microbial biomass via preliminary incubation and further test how changes in soil MBS influence residue decomposition and SOM mineralization in the presence of exogenous residue. The protocol includes six main steps: sample preparation, determination of optimal glucose level to increase MBS, preincubation experiment, confirmation of MBS changes, incubation experiment, and determination of PE and residue decomposition. The step-by-step procedure is partly modified from previous publications9,10.

Protocol

1. Sample preparation

  1. Randomly collect five samples to a depth of 20 cm from arable soil (Mollic Haploxeralf) and form a composite sample.
  2. Remove visible plant residue and sieve soils through a 2 mm sieve.
  3. Store soil samples at 4 °C for the incubation experiment.

2. Determination of optimal glucose level

  1. Determine soil water-holding capacity (WHC) as described by Rey et al.11.
  2. Place soils (~20 g dry weight) in specimen cups (120 mL), mix with different concentrations of glucose solutions (0, 80, 160, 240, 320, 400, 800, 1,600, and 3,200 μg glucose-C/g), and move cups into 500 mL Mason jars (Table of Materials).
  3. Adjust soil moisture to 60% of WHC by adding deionized (DI) water using a syringe equipped with a fine-tipped needle (Table of Materials). Close all jars with air-tight lids containing a septum for gas sampling.
  4. Collect soil gas samples with a 20 mL gas-tight syringe (Table of Materials) from the lid of each Mason jar and store in 12 mL preevacuated vacuum bottles (Table of Materials) immediately after closing the jars. Incubate the jars in the dark at 22 °C.  
  5. Sample gases again after 2 h.
  6. Determine the CO2 concentration in gas samples with a gas chromatograph equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (Table of Materials).
  7. Calculate microbial respiration rate (μ mol/h, Rs) as the rate of CO2 production in 2 h according to the following equation:

    Rs = (CO2, 2h - CO2, initial)/2

    where CO2, 2h and CO2, initial are the total CO2 production (μ mol) from soils after a 2 h incubation and at the beginning of the incubation.
  8. Identify the optimal amount of glucose added for a given soil (here, 240 μg C/g and 1,600 μg C/g soil for the crop and grass soils, respectively), defined as the minimum amount of glucose that induces the maximal respiration rate.

3. Preincubation experiment

  1. Incubate bulk soils (~20 g dry weight) with glucose solution (240 μg C/g and 1,600 μg C/g soil for the crop and grass soils, respectively) in Mason jars (500 mL) in the dark at 50% of WHC at 22 °C for 7 days to increase soil MBS.
  2. Simultaneously with glucose addition, add a mixture of mineral salts to ensure no nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium limitation during the preincubation. Add nitrogen in the form of ammonium sulfate (15 mg/mL) to achieve a glucose-C/ammonium sulfate-N ratio of 10. Add phosphorus and potassium in the forms of two phosphate salts (here, K2HPO4 and KH2PO4) in respective ratios so that pH changes are less than 0.1 units after the mixture addition12.
  3. Incubate soils without glucose and mineral salts additions in parallel at 50% of WHC at 22 °C for 7 days as control soils without the alteration in soil MBS.
  4. Maintain soil moisture at 50% of WHC by regularly weighing the Mason jars and adding DI water to compensate for moisture loss.

4. Confirmation of changes in microbial biomass size

  1. At the end of the preincubation, take a subsample (5 g) of the preincubated soils for analyses of soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and soil microbial community structure and composition.
  2. Determine soil MBC using fumigation-extraction13,14. Analyze microbial community structure and composition using real-time qPCR and high-throughput sequencing methods15. Alternatively, analyze the phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) following the method described by Buyer and Sasser16.
  3. Confirm the increase in soil microbial biomass with glucose preincubation based on soil MBC by comparing with soils without glucose preincubation.
  4. Confirm negligible shifts in the microbial community structure and composition based on the high-throughput sequencing analysis or PLFA analysis after the preincubation. Perform the principal component analysis using statistical software (Table of Materials).

5. Incubation experiment

  1. Mix the glucose preincubated soils (~20 g dry weight) with or without 13C-labelled ryegrass residue powder (<2 mm, 2.1 mg C/g dry soil) in specimen cups (120 mL) using a spatula. Place the cups into Mason jars (500 mL).
    NOTE: Here, the residue has an organic carbon of 420.0 g/kg, total nitrogen of 10.1 g/kg, and 13C (atom %) of 1.70.
  2. Adjust soil moisture to 60% of WHC by weighing the Mason jars and adding DI water using a syringe equipped with a fine-tipped needle.
  3. Add 2 mL of DI water to each jar and close all jars with air-tight lids. Incubate them in the dark at 22 °C.
  4. Set up three jars without soil and residue in the same way to determine the background CO2 concentration and 13C natural abundance.
  5. Take soil gas samples from the jars with a gas-tight syringe (20 mL) and store in preevacuated vacuum bottles (12 mL) immediately after closing the jars.
  6. Sample gases again after 24 h to determine the rate of CO2 production during the past 24 h and 13C value in CO2.
  7. Adjust soil moisture at 60% of WHC by weighing the Mason jars and adding DI water. Ventilate the jars for 10 min with CO2-free air, close, and incubate at 22 °C in the dark.
  8. Repeat steps 5.5−5.7 once per day during the first week, then once per week during the next 3 weeks.
  9. Analyze CO2 concentration in gas samples with a gas chromatograph system equipped with a thermal conductivity detector. Analyze 13CO2 using an online gas preparation and introduction system interfaced to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Table of Materials).

6. Calculation of priming effect and residue decomposition

  1. Calculate the fraction (fresidue) of CO2 production from residue using the following equation:

    fresidue = (13CO2 atom%residue - 13CO2 atom%control)/(13C atom%residue - 13C atom%soil)

    where 13CO2 atom%residue and 13CO2 atom%control are the 13C contents of mixed CO2 produced from the soil amended with and without residue, respectively; 13C atom%residue and 13C atom%soil are the 13C signatures of the added residue and soils, respectively.
  2. Again, calculate CO2 production derived from residue (CO2, residue) and native SOM (CO2, SOM) as follows:

    CO2, residue = CO2, total x fresidue
    CO2, SOM = CO2, total - CO2, residue

    where CO2, total is the total CO2 production from soils amended with residue.
  3. Calculate the PE of residue addition on native SOM mineralization according to the following equation:

    PE = CO2, SOM  - CO2, control

    where CO2, SOM and CO2, control are the CO2 production derived from native SOM and from the control soils without residue, respectively.
  4. Calculate the percentage (presidue) of residue decomposed based on the following equation:

    presidue = CO2, residue-C/Cresidue x 100%

    where CO2, residue-C is the accumulative CO2 production (CO2-C) derived from residue, and Cresidue is the organic carbon in the added residue.

Results

A critical step of the protocol is to determine the optimal concentrations of glucose used to promote microbial growth while not causing a great shift of soil microbial community structure and composition. An example of glucose level determination used to increase soil MBS has been shown in a previous study10. Two soils with a 23-year history of crops and grass cover with contrasting soil organic carbon content were sampled and used in the study. The CO2 production from crop and grass s...

Discussion

The protocol provides a method to determine SOM priming from the supply of fresh plant residue as well as its decomposition, which has been reported in previous studies. The creative aspect provided in this protocol is that soil microbial biomass is artificially changed to explore the relationships between the size of microbial biomass and SOM priming. By using the method, only the size of soil microbial biomass is changed, maintaining other soil properties (i.e., soil nutrients, soil texture, etc.) that are similar amon...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS-LY-DQC017), the Funding for Excellent Young Scholars of the Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (DLSYQ13001), and the J.G. Boswell Endowed Chair in Soil Science.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Delta V Advantage IRAM through a GC/C-III interfaceThermo Electron Corp., Bremen, Germany
Gas chromatograph (GC) systemShimadzu
Gas-tight syringe (20 mL)Amazon.cnB01N98U7GXIt can be used to add water and sample gas.
GC combustion isotope ratio mass spectrometer (GC/C-IRMS)Thermo
JMP 13Jmp.com
Mason jarAmazon.cnB00B80TJUI
Trace GC Ultra gas chromatographThermo Electron Corp., Milan, Italy
Vacuum bottles (Labco bottle)Ojielabs.com039W

References

  1. Boddy, E., Hill, P., Farrar, J., Jones, D. Fast turnover of low molecular weight components of the dissolved organic carbon pool of temperate grassland field soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 39, 827-835 (2007).
  2. Fontaine, S., Barot, S. Size and functional diversity of microbe populations control plant persistence and long-term soil carbon accumulation. Ecology Letters. 8, 1075-1087 (2005).
  3. Fontaine, S., et al. Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 43, 86-96 (2011).
  4. Pascault, N., et al. In situ dynamics of microbial communities during decomposition of wheat, rape, and alfalfa residues. Environmental Microbiology. 60, 816-828 (2010).
  5. Murphy, C. J., Baggs, E. M., Morley, N., Wall, D. P., Paterson, E. Rhizosphere priming can promote mobilisation of N-rich compounds from soil organic matter. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 81, 236-243 (2015).
  6. Rousk, J., Hill, P. W., Jones, D. L. Priming of the decomposition of ageing soil organic matter: concentration dependence and microbial control. Functional Ecology. 29, 285-296 (2015).
  7. Liu, X. -. J. A., et al. Labile carbon input determines the direction and magnitude of the priming effect. Applied Soil Ecology. 109, 7-13 (2017).
  8. Blagodatskaya, E. V., Kuzyakov, Y. Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 45, 115-131 (2008).
  9. Li, L. J., Ye, R., Zhu-Barker, X., Horwath, W. R. Soil microbial biomass size and nitrogen availability regulate the incorporation of residue carbon into dissolved organic pool and microbial biomass. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 83, 1083-1092 (2019).
  10. Li, L. J., Zhu-Barker, X., Ye, R., Doane, T. A., Horwath, W. R. Soil microbial biomass size and soil carbon influence the priming effect from carbon inputs depending on nitrogen availability. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 119, 41-49 (2018).
  11. Rey, A., Petsikos, C., Jarvis, P. G., Grace, J. Effect of temperature and moisture on rates of carbon mineralization in a Mediterranean oak forest soil under controlled and field conditions. European Journal of Soil Science. 56, 589-599 (2005).
  12. Blagodatskaya, E. V., Blagodatsky, S. A., Anderson, T. -. H., Kuzyakov, Y. Contrasting effects of glucose, living roots and maize straw on microbial growth kinetics and substrate availability in soil. European Journal of Soil Science. 60, 186-197 (2009).
  13. Brookes, P. C., Landman, A., Pruden, G., Jenkinson, D. S. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 17, 837-842 (1985).
  14. Vance, E., Brookes, P., Jenkinson, D. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass. C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 19, 703-707 (1987).
  15. Liu, Z., et al. Long-term continuous cropping of soybean is comparable to crop rotation in mediating microbial abundance, diversity and community composition. Soil & Tillage Research. 197, 104503 (2020).
  16. Buyer, J. S., Sasser, M. High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils. Applied Soil Ecology. 61, 127-130 (2012).
  17. Garcia-Pausas, J., Paterson, E. Microbial community abundance and structure are determinants of soil organic matter mineralisation in the presence of labile carbon. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 43, 1705-1713 (2011).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

litter decompositionmicrobial biomass carbonpriming effectrespiration ratesoil microbial biomass carbonsoil organic carbonsoil organic matter mineralization

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved