A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This protocol describes the intrafemoral injection of a few hematopoietic or leukemic stem cells, including gene-edited cells, in murine xenograft models, which will not only enable the quick and safe transplantation of cells but also serial analyses of the bone marrow.

Abstract

Despite the complexity of hematopoietic cell transplantation in humans, researchers commonly perform intravenous or intrafemoral (IF) injections in mice. In murine models, this technique has been adapted to enhance the seeding efficiency of transplanted hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). This paper describes a detailed step-by-step technical procedure of IF injection and the following bone marrow (BM) aspiration in mice that allows for serial characterization of cells present in the BM. This method enables the transplantation of valuable samples with low cell numbers that are particularly difficult to engraft by intravenous injection. This procedure facilitates the creation of xenografts that are critical for pathological analysis. While it is easier to access peripheral blood (PB), the cellular composition of PB does not reflect the BM, which is the niche for HSPCs. Therefore, procedures providing access to the BM compartment are essential for studying hematopoiesis. IF injection and serial BM aspiration, as described here, allow for the prospective retrieval and characterization of cells enriched in the BM, such as HSPCs, without sacrificing the mice.

Introduction

The blood system is maintained throughout life by hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which reside in bone marrow (BM)1,2. To study dynamic changes in the BM environment, it is important to understand the biology of both normal and malignant hematopoiesis3,4. Transplantation of HSCs directly into human BM yields higher engraftment than peripheral blood (PB) infusion, but high procedural complexity and increased risk of infection preclude this method from being part of standard practice5. In mice, procedures that facilitate BM access without sacrificing the animals provide a resource to serially monitor hematopoiesis. The described procedure aims to produce mice with high engraftment of transplanted cells and allow for serial sampling of the BM of live mice. This paper will focus on producing xenograft models using immunodeficient mice engrafted with human cells, which are more challenging to produce than mouse-mouse allotransplantation models. Compared to conventional transplantation of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) through the tail or retroorbital vein, the advantages of this procedure are high cellular engraftment with a low amount of starting material.

Although intrafemoral (IF) cellular injection into the BM cavity of mice is commonly used to study human HSPCs in vivo6,7,8, a formal step-by-step procedure illustrating/filming this technique has not been previously published. This protocol enables high engraftment from a low number of transplanted cells and a mechanism to sample the BM serially. Furthermore, it is possible to utilize this method to analyze the effects of injecting drugs directly into the BM cavity on the treatment of blood diseases. The procedure described here helps obtain access to BM where hematopoietic cells reside without sacrificing the mice.

This protocol is similar to the technique used for BM aspirations9. The key difference is that this paper and the accompanying video protocol detail a safe procedure for injecting cells into the marrow, whereas previous papers transplanted cells via the vein and then performed serial BM aspiration. This protocol enables successful engraftment with small numbers of a cell line (Figure 1), normal cord blood (CB)-derived HSPCs (CD34+) (Figure 2) and HSCs (CD34+CD38-CD45RA-CD90+) (Figure 3), normal BM-derived HSPCs (CD34+CD38-) (Figure 4), patient-derived leukemic stem cells (CD34+CD38-) (Figure 5), CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited normal CB-derived HSPCs (CD34+) (Figure 6), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-iPSCs (Figure 7). Especially for the normal cord blood-derived HSCs, we could successfully make engraftment with only 10 cells. This method is especially valuable for experiments performed with rare or difficult-to-generate cell populations such as unmodified or gene-edited primary human acute myeloid leukemia or CB cells. Furthermore, this procedure describes an efficient method for the serial analysis of engrafted cells, which can be immediately used in downstream experiments. To avoid wasting valuable samples and ensure IF injection, we have also briefly described Akaluc-based procedure10 practices here to help solidify this technique.

Protocol

Six- to ten-week-old male or female NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice were used in this protocol, but it can be applied to all types of mice. The irradiation depends on the experimental content and the type of mice, whether or not to irradiate the mice depends on the research objectives. All animal procedures described here were conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by Stanford University's Administrative Panel on Lab Animal Care (APLAC #22264). All normal blood cell populations were sorted out fresh. Human AML samples were obtained from patients at the Stanford Medical Center with informed consent, according to institutional review board (IRB)-approved protocols (Stanford IRB, 33818).

1. Intrafemoral injection of cell lines, hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), or leukemic stem cells (LSCs)

NOTE: To easily analyze the injected cells with an imaging device, an Akaluc/tdTomato-positive K562 cell line was generated, and AkaLumine-HCl/Akaluc was used as a substrate10. If imaging equipment is not available, cells can be labeled with a fluorescent dye by lentivirus or PiggyBac and analyzed by flow cytometry. Regardless of the details of cell preparation, having a way to prove that the cells administered into the bone marrow have reliably entered the BM is important for improving this technique (Figure 1).

  1. Prepare cell suspensions (up to 3 Γ— 106 blood cells) with 20 Β΅L of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) + 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS) + 2 mM EDTA) or Thaw medium (IMDM + 20% FBS + Pen/Strep) in PCR or 1.5 mL tubes and keep on ice before injection.
    NOTE: Avoid making air bubbles while suspending the cells with the needle. Bubbles should be removed as much as possible right before the injection, as injecting air bubbles can cause sudden death of mice.
  2. Condition 6-10-week-old adult mice with 200 cGy (225 kV, 13.3 mA, total 2 Gy [Dose control mode]) up to 48 h prior to injection of the cells.
  3. First, anesthetize the mice with isoflurane inhalation in an induction chamber and maintain at 2% isoflurane in 100% oxygen at a flow rate of 1-2 L/min via a nose cone to reach a steady state of anesthesia. Check the depth of anesthesia with a toe pinch reflex and slow, steady breathing, and maintain this state throughout the isoflurane procedure.
    NOTE: Monitor the depth of the anesthesia every 3-5 min throughout the procedure to ensure there is no change in heart and respiratory rates with surgical manipulation and/or ear, toe, and tail pinch. The color of mucous membranes and skin can be used as an indicator of oxygenation, as they will be pinkish if the mice are in good condition. Exercise caution when opaque drapes are placed over the mouse, as it is not always possible to see what is happening with the mouse.
  4. Prior to the procedure, administer mice with 10 mg/kg carprofen subcutaneously to minimize pain and warm 0.5-1.0 mL of 0.9% saline for supportive care.
  5. Apply ophthalmic ointment to the eyes of the mouse to avoid corneal drying.
  6. Keep the mouse on a heat pad or other thermostatically controlled surface to prevent hypothermia during the procedure.
    NOTE: After the procedure, a temperature-adjustable heating pad is used. The body temperature of the mouse is typically 37-39 Β°C, and the pad should ideally be slightly lower than this. In practice, the temperature is often set at 32-36 Β°C.
  7. Disinfect the entire leg containing the femur to be injected with three sets of alternating scrubs (alternating with either a povidone-iodine or a chlorhexidine scrub and 70% ethanol-soaked gauze sponges).
    NOTE: 1) If the operator is left-handed, the left femur of the mouse might be easier to inject than the right femur. 2) In this study, the fur was not removed for injections to avoid unnecessary skin damage, and the needle entry site can be easily located without cutting the fur off. However, in mice with dark fur, it may be challenging to locate the puncture site, in which case, consider cutting off the fur as it is quick and easy to start the injection.
  8. Pinch the femur gently with the thumb and index fingers to stabilize the leg. Push the tibia with either the ring or the fifth finger to keep the tibia bent from the femur. Positioning is important for successful injection (Supplementary Figure S1-S5).
    NOTE: Use forceps to pinch the bone to prevent injury to the fingers; however, it might be difficult to feel the shaft of the femur and will add time to the procedure.
  9. Insert an empty sterile 27 G needle (1/2 inch) with an attached syringe just under the patellar tendon so that the needle is lodged securely between the two condyles of the femur. Use the edge of the needle and peck the patellar tendon on top of the femur lightly a couple of times to find the best place to insert the needle (Supplementary Figure S1-S5).
    NOTE: A knowledge of the anatomy of the mouse knee area is necessary before performing this procedure. Beginners should take the time to understand the anatomy of the area and practice the procedure on an euthanized mouse before attempting it on a live mouse.
  10. Swivel the needle outward and upward to ensure it is parallel with the shaft of the femur.
    NOTE: This maneuver provides a reliable path to the marrow cavity, facilitates retrieval of marrow contents from the femoral shaft, and minimizes discomfort to the animal from the procedure.
  11. Turn the needle in circles while slowly advancing into the femoral marrow cavity. Insert the needle until there is a noticeable reduction in resistance. Confirm the correct positioning of the needle by gently moving the syringe laterally. If it is possible to touch the edge of the needle with the fingers coming outside the bone, go back to step 1.9 and find another angle and place to drill the needle down.
    1. Ensure that the needle's entry angle is perpendicular to the bone end-face.
      NOTE: Theoretically, the needle must be injected parallel to the femur and must be at a 90Β° angle to the bone ends. If there is resistance from the interior surface, the needle has been correctly placed in the femoral cavity. To make sure the needle is parallel to the bone, place a light on the side of the bone and observe the shadow of the bone parallel to the shaft of the needle. The decrease in resistance upon entry into the bone marrow cavity depends on the age of the mouse: the younger the mouse, the easier it is to recognize the decrease in resistance.
  12. Create negative pressure by gently pulling the needle plunger back while moving the needle back and forth within the BM cavity. If the needle is in the BM cavity, some blood/marrow will come out in the syringe.
    1. If the blood/marrow is not seen, change to a new needle and try to find the same route.
      NOTE: The reason for changing to a new needle is that once the bone clogs the needle, it becomes difficult to check for the backflow of the blood/marrow. Minimizing the number of injection routes into the BM cavity is crucial, as cells injected into the bone marrow have the potential to leak out of the femur through previous entry points. If multiple injection routes are necessary, leaking risk can be reduced by injecting cells gradually rather than a quick bolus.
  13. Remove the needle slowly and insert the cell-containing syringe through the same route. Try to insert the needle until it stops (at the edge of the BM cavity) and pull back a little bit (1-2 mm) from there to inject the cells easily. Prior to depressing the plunger and releasing the cells, aspirate slightly and check for blood/marrow to ensure the correct placement of the needle. Check the backflow of the blood/marrow first and then push the syringe slowly to inject the cells.
    ​NOTES: It is very important to remember the route and angle of the first injection when switching to a new needle. If the same route cannot be found, try again with the original needle used to make the first route. A new needle may be used at this time, but if the original needle is used, the jammed bone should be pushed out once before use. Do not use the needle with the cells to find a new route to inject; otherwise, pieces of bone stuck in the needle may prevent cell dispersal. Although the BM cavity is very small, the injection volume should be less than 30 Β΅L, considering the dead cavity.
    1. Ensure that the speed of injection is slow to prevent air in the syringe from entering the bone marrow and to prevent cells from leaking from the puncture site. If resistance is felt while pushing the syringe, move the needle up and down to find a less resistant area in the cavity.
  14. Once the cells are successfully injected into the femur, remove the needle and syringe from the mouse while maintaining pressure on the syringe.
    NOTE: Try again with the other femur if the injection cannot be completed. The procedure is very stressful for the mouse, even under anesthesia. Always monitor the vital signs (heart and breathing rate) of the mouse and try to finish the procedure as soon as possible.
  15. Remove the mouse from the nose cone and place it on a clean paper towel to prevent aspiration of bedding. During the recovery, keep the mouse on a heating pad or other thermostatically controlled surface. Monitor all mice to verify recovery from anesthesia prior to placing them back on the mouse rack.
    NOTE: There should be no complication or distress post aspiration if done properly. The procedure will be completed when anesthetized mice have recovered and are able to ambulate and reach food and water.
  16. Observe the mice for signs of distress or infection post-procedure over the next 24 h. Signs of distress or infection include constant bleeding, anemia, and lethargy. If any of these signs are seen post-procedure, euthanize the animal(s) by CO2 inhalation or cervical dislocation according to the animal handling protocol.

2. Aspiration of bone marrow cells from the femur for the FACS analysis

NOTE: The procedure for aspirating the BM cells from the mice is very similar to the methods described in section 1 and can be learned from some previous literature9,11,12. The following is an overview of some differences between the BM injection and aspiration protocols.

  1. Prepare 500 Β΅L of PBS + 10 mM EDTA (cell suspension medium: CSM) per sample for suspending the BM aspiration.
  2. Wet a 0.5 mL 27 G syringe with CSM before aspirating the BM. Fill the syringe with 200-500 Β΅L of CSM and immediately expel it. Repeat this procedure 2-3x.
  3. Aspirate the BM gently by withdrawing the plunger on the syringe yielding 20-50 Β΅L of mouse BM. Then, fully remove the needle from the femur and suspend the aspirated sample in CSM (500 Β΅L in a 1.5 mL tube) for the following staining step. Remove the mouse from the nose cone and place it on a clean paper towel to prevent aspiration of bedding during recovery. Monitor all mice to verify recovery from anesthesia prior to placing them back on the mouse rack.
    NOTE: BM aspiration/sampling can be repeated, but the repeat procedure on the same day must be performed on the opposite femur to prevent repeated trauma to the same leg. Although there is little information on the frequency of BM aspiration, we believe that femoral BM aspiration is generally repeated every 4 weeks and can be performed at least 3-4x in total without any issues (e.g., infection) based on our experience. However, it should be kept in mind that the bone marrow on the contralateral side of the transplanted bone marrow generally has lower cellular engraftment.
  4. Pellet cells from the bone marrow aspirate by a 5 min spin at 300 Γ— g, 4 Β°C.
  5. Aspirate the supernatant, add 0.5-1 mL of ACK lysis buffer (150 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, 0.1 mM EDTA) to each tube, and vortex to resuspend the cells. Place on ice for 5-10 min.
  6. Filter each tube through nylon mesh into a new tube.
  7. Rinse the tube with 1 mL of FACS buffer and add it through the nylon mesh into a new tube as well.
  8. Pellet cells by a 5 min spin at 300 Γ— g, 4 Β°C.
  9. Aspirate the supernatant and add the staining solution containing the desired antibodies13. Place on ice for 20 min.
  10. Wash the cells and analyze them as per the experimental setup.
    1. Wash cells with FACS buffer (PBS, 2% FBS, 2 mM EDTA) and stain them with antibodies for 30 min on ice in a total volume of 50 Β΅L. Wash and stain the cells with propidium iodide (PI) at a final concentration of 1 Β΅g/mL immediately before the analysis or sorting. Perform post sort analyses to verify the purity of the sorted cell populations.
      NOTE: All antibodies used for flow cytometry are detailed in the Table of Materials.
    2. Use the following FACS gating strategies (Figure 2-7) to analyze the engrafted cells from the mouse bone marrow.
      1. Distinguish populations of cells by their forward (size) and side scatter (granularity) properties.
      2. Perform doublet discrimination by plotting FSC-H vs FSC-W, following SSC-H vs SSC-W.
      3. Exclude dead cells.
      4. Distinguish populations of cells by human CD45 and mouse CD45. These antibody staining combinations enable the detection of human CD3, CD19, and CD33 as well within the human CD45 fraction.
        NOTE: Before staining the samples, remember to use mouse and human Fc blocks to prevent non-specific antibody binding. We usually stain with the Fc blocks (mouse + human) for 10 min on ice and then add the antibodies without washing the cells. Refer to each company's instructions on how to use the Fc block antibodies.

Results

Following these protocols1,14,15,16,17,18,19,20, each sample was transplanted, and the xenograft mouse model was established. The aim of the experiments here was to show IF injection with several types of human cells and following bone marrow aspiration/ana...

Discussion

Murine xenograft models are important for studying both normal and pathological human hematopoiesis. The BM is the source of hematopoiesis3; therefore, studying hematological diseases requires the successful engraftment of rare human stem cells into the murine BM. So far, transplantation methods such as a tail vein, retroorbital vein, and IF injection have been reported, and it is known that any of these methods can engraft transplanted cells. IF injection is a transplantation method that has been...

Disclosures

R.M. is on the Advisory Boards of Kodikaz Therapeutic Solutions, Orbital Therapeutics, and 858 Therapeutics and is an inventor on a number of patents related to CD47 cancer immunotherapy licensed to Gilead Sciences. R.M. is a co-founder and equity holder of Pheast Therapeutics, MyeloGene, and Orbital Therapeutics.

Acknowledgements

We thank all the members of the Majeti lab for their help, support, encouragement, and inspiration over the years. We acknowledge the Flow Cytometry Core of the Stanford Stem Cell Institute, the Binns Program for Cord Blood Research, and the patients for donating their samples. For human samples, normal donor human bone marrow and peripheral blood cells were obtained fresh from AllCells or the Stanford Blood Center. We thank the Nakauchi lab at Stanford University for donating the pBac-AkaLuc-tdTomato plasmid. Above all, we would like to thank the veterinarians and animal control staff at the Veterinary Service Center at Stanford who take care of our mice. In particular, Mike Alvares, supervisor of the animal center, has been so thorough in his management of the mice that it is no exaggeration to say that without him, our research would not have been possible.

This work was supported by NIH grants 1R01HL142637 and 1R01CA251331, the Stanford Ludwig Center for Cancer Stem Cell Research and Medicine, and the Blood Cancer Discoveries Grant program through The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, The Mark Foundation for Cancer Research, and The Paul G. Allen Frontiers Group, all to R.M. R.M. is a recipient of a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar Award. Y.N. was supported by the Nakayama Foundation for Human Science and a Stanford University School of Medicine Dean's Postdoctoral Fellowship. A.E. was supported by the NCI under award F32CA250304, the Advanced Residency Training Program at Stanford, and the American Society of Hematology Scholar Award.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1/2 mL Syringe, 27 GBD305620https://www.bd.com/en-ca/offerings/capabilities/bd-luer-lok-syringe-with-attached-needle/305620
ACK Lysing BufferQualoty Biological118-156-101CShttps://www.qualitybiological.com/product/ack-lysing-buffer/
Biological IrradiatorKimtronIC-250https://www.kimtron.com/ic-250
ChlorhexidineNolvasanNDC 54771-8701-1https://www.zoetisus.com/products/petcare/nolvasan-skin-and-wound-cleanser
Ethyl alcohol, proof 190Gold Shieldhttps://goldsd.com/line-card/
FACSCanto IIΒ (Becton Dickinson and Company (BD), Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS)Omega ScientificFB-01https://www.omegascientific.com/product/fetal-bovine-serum-usda-certified/
Flow cytometer, AriaIIBeckton Dickinson (BD)cell sorting
IMDMGibco12440053https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/12440053
Isoflurane, USPDechraNDC 17033-094-25https://www.dechra-us.com/our-products/us/companion-animal/dog/prescription/isoflurane-usp-inhalation-anesthetic
NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) miceΒ Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA
Strain #:005557
Six- to ten-week-old male or femaleΒ 
Ophthalmic ointment, USPBausch LombNDC 24208-780-55https://www.bausch.com/contentassets/2914df881e4344a
7a202cc5a0673c977/neomycin-and-polymyxin-b-sulfates-gramicidin-ophthalmic-solution.pdf
OstiFen Injection (Caprofen)VetOneNDC 13985-748-20http://vetone.net/Default/CatHeaderPage?id=9534ccca-eac5-4d68-8ad8-46436067587b
PBS, pH 7.4Homemade
Penicillin-StreptomycinGibco15140122https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/15140122
Povidone-iodineBetadineNDC 67618-155-16https://www.betadine.com/veterinary-surgical-scrub-and-solution/
TokeOni (in the U.S.)Sigma-Aldrich808350-5MGAkaLumine-HCl/Akaluc; https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/US/en/product/aldrich/808350
UltraPure 0.5 M EDTA, pH 8.0Invitrogen15575020https://www.thermofisher.com/order/catalog/product/15575020
Engraftment antibody panel (in vivo, mouse bone marrow)
AntigenDilution
Antigen: Anti-human CD45
Fluorophore: V450
Clone: HI30
BD Biosciences5603671:25
Antigen: Anti-mouse CD45.1
Fluorophore: PE-Cy7
Clone: A20
eBioscience25-0453-811:50
Antigen:Anti-mouse TER-119
Fluorophore: PE-Cy5
Clone: TER-119
eBioscience15-5921-831:100
Antigen:Anti-human CD3
Fluorophore: APC-Cy7
Clone: SK7
BD Biosciences3410901:12.5
Antigen:Anti-human CD19
Fluorophore: APC
Clone: HIB19
BD Biosciences5554151:25
Antigen:Anti-human CD33
Fluorophore: PE
Clone: WM53
BD Biosciences5554501:25
Live/Dead stainingConc.
PIInvitrogen1 ΞΌg/mL
Compensation beads
Negative controlBD BiosciencesSee instruction for details
Anti-mouse Ig, ΞΊBD BiosciencesSee instruction for details

References

  1. Majeti, R., Park, C. Y., Weissman, I. L. Identification of a hierarchy of multipotent hematopoietic progenitors in human cord blood. Cell Stem Cell. 1 (6), 635-645 (2007).
  2. Wilkinson, A. C., Igarashi, K. J., Nakauchi, H. Haematopoietic stem cell self-renewal in vivo and ex vivo. Nature reviews. Genetics. 132, 1-14 (2020).
  3. Pinho, S., Frenette, P. S. Haematopoietic stem cell activity and interactions with the niche. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 20 (5), 303-320 (2019).
  4. MΓ©ndez-Ferrer, S., et al. Bone marrow niches in haematological malignancies. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 20 (5), 285-298 (2020).
  5. Frassoni, F., et al. Direct intrabone transplant of unrelated cord-blood cells in acute leukaemia: a phase I/II study. The Lancet. Oncology. 9 (9), 831-839 (2008).
  6. Mazurier, F., Doedens, M., Gan, O. I., Dick, J. E. Rapid myeloerythroid repopulation after intrafemoral transplantation of NOD-SCID mice reveals a new class of human stem cells. Nature Medicine. 9 (7), 959-963 (2003).
  7. McKenzie, J. L., Gan, O. I., Doedens, M., Dick, J. E. Human short-term repopulating stem cells are efficiently detected following intrafemoral transplantation into NOD/SCID recipients depleted of CD122+ cells. Blood. 106 (4), 1259-1261 (2005).
  8. Futrega, K., Lott, W. B., Doran, M. R. Direct bone marrow HSC transplantation enhances local engraftment at the expense of systemic engraftment in NSG mice. Scientific Reports. 6 (1), 23886 (2016).
  9. Chung, Y. R., Kim, E., Abdel-Wahab, O. Femoral bone marrow aspiration in live mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments. (89), e51660 (2014).
  10. Iwano, S., et al. Single-cell bioluminescence imaging of deep tissue in freely moving animals. Science. 359 (6378), 935-939 (2018).
  11. Sundberg, R. D., Hodgson, R. E. Aspiration of bone marrow in laboratory animals. Blood. 4 (5), 557-561 (1949).
  12. Schmitz, M., Bourquin, J. -. P., Bornhauser, B. C. Alternative technique for intrafemoral injection and bone marrow sampling in mouse transplant models. Leukemia & lymphoma. 52 (9), 1806-1808 (2011).
  13. Nakauchi, Y., et al. The cell type-specific 5hmC landscape and dynamics of healthy human hematopoiesis and TET2-mutant preleukemia. Blood Cancer Discovery. 3 (4), 346-367 (2022).
  14. Chan, S. M., et al. Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 mutations induce BCL-2 dependence in acute myeloid leukemia. Nature Medicine. 21 (2), 178-184 (2015).
  15. Zhang, T. Y., et al. IL-6 blockade reverses bone marrow failure induced by human acute myeloid leukemia. Science Translational Medicine. 12 (538), (2020).
  16. Bak, R. O., et al. Multiplexed genetic engineering of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using CRISPR/Cas9 and AAV6. eLIFE. 6, 27873 (2017).
  17. Nishimura, T., et al. Sufficiency for inducible Caspase-9 safety switch in human pluripotent stem cells and disease cells. Gene Therapy. 27 (10-11), 525-534 (2019).
  18. Chao, M. P., et al. Human AML-iPSCs reacquire leukemic properties after differentiation and model clonal variation of disease. Cell Stem Cell. 20 (3), 329-344 (2017).
  19. Okada, M., et al. A prospective multicenter phase II study of intrabone marrow transplantation of unwashed cord blood using reduced-intensity conditioning. European Journal of Haematology. 100 (4), 335-343 (2018).
  20. Fink, D., et al. Capacity of the medullary cavity of tibia and femur for intra-bone marrow transplantation in mice. PloS One. 14 (11), 0224576 (2019).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Intrafemoral InjectionBone Marrow AnalysisHematopoietic Stem And Progenitor CellsXenograftHematopoiesisMouse ModelTransplantationSerial CharacterizationBone Marrow Aspiration

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved