A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Platelet function under flow can be assessed and simulated hemostatic resuscitation can be modeled using a microfluidic device, which has applications in trauma and transfusion medicine.
Microfluidics incorporate physiologically relevant substrates and flows that mimic the vasculature and are, therefore, a valuable tool for studying aspects of thrombosis and hemostasis. At high-shear environments simulating arterial flow, a microfluidic assay facilitates the study of platelet function, as platelet-rich thrombi form in a localized stenotic region of a flow channel. Utilizing devices that allow for small sample volume can additionally aid in evaluating platelet function under flow from volume-limited patient samples or animal models. Studying trauma patient samples or samples following platelet product transfusion may aid in directing therapeutic strategies for patient populations in which platelet function is critical. Effects of platelet inhibition via pharmacological agents can also be studied in this model. The objective of this protocol is to establish a microfluidic platform that incorporates physiologic flow, biological surfaces, and relevant hemostatic mechanisms to assess platelet function with implications for the study of trauma induced coagulopathy and transfusion medicine.
Trauma is a leading global cause of death and disability. Severe injury is frequently complicated by a unique, endogenous disturbance of hemostasis and thrombosis, termed trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC)1. Platelets play a critical role in TIC, and they have been described as having both adaptive and maladaptive functions2. The mechanisms of platelet dysfunction after injury remain unclear, and there is a critical need to better understand the cellular response to guide the development of improved resuscitation and therapy. An additional vexing problem regarding platelet function after injury is the uncertainty of the reliability of present readouts of platelet function in the trauma patient.
Multiple studies have shown that even mildly injured patients, with no known clinical bleeding phenotype, have abnormal platelet function using conventional platelet function testing such as aggregometry3,4. However, limitations in aggregometry to assess platelet function in an injury setting include a lack of physiologically relevant injury surface, a reductionist approach to agonist stimulation, sample dilution with whole blood impedance aggregometry, plasma separation with optical light transmission aggregometry, and stagnant sample assessment. Additionally, whether this sensitivity of platelet function represents true cellular dysfunction or a measurement artifact, such as increased baseline electrical impedance, in the setting of injury remains unclear2. Thus, studying relevant platelet functions in the context of trauma is crucial to understanding TIC, and there is substantial room for innovation and improvement in this area.
Platforms traditionally used to study platelet function do not include fluid dynamics and flow, which may be critical in understanding platelet dysfunction pertaining to trauma and trauma-induced coagulopathy5. Mechanisms of hemostasis that are dependent on flow include von Willebrand factor (VWF) elongation at high shear, above a critical shear rate, and platelet capture via glycoprotein 1b6,7,8, which are not captured using stagnant platelet function assays. Additionally, platelets preferentially bind VWF or fibrinogen depending on the flow regime and elicit differential roles in arterial versus venous thrombosis9,10. Arterial thrombi are mainly comprised of platelets while venous thrombi are mainly comprised of red blood cells, based, in part, on flow regimes11. Assays that incorporate flow regimes can aid in elucidating dysfunctions pertaining to the spectrum of TIC phenotypes, from hypocoagulability and bleeding phenotypes to hypercoagulability and thrombotic phenotypes. Finally, blood volume sampling constraints with trauma patient populations may make traditional platelet function testing challenging. While assays such as flow cytometry can and should be utilized in these circumstances, results often depict a physical characterization of a sample and not a hemostatic functional assessment.
While mechanisms of platelet dysfunction may not be completely understood in trauma, modeling platelet dysfunction in vitro, with P2Y12 antagonists for example, can also help guide the study of therapeutic interventions. Hemostatic resuscitation is critically important in trauma patients where blood products are transfused in a balanced approach to address shock, coagulopathy, and endothelial injury with either whole blood or blood components (red blood cells, plasma, and platelet concentrates) in a 1:1:1 unit ratio12,13,14. In trauma patients, early use of blood products is associated with improved survival15,16. To extend shelf life, cold-stored platelet products have been increasingly studied. Examination of cold-stored platelets shows increased hemostatic activity, as well as safety when transfused following injury17,18.
The evolution of cold-stored platelet resuscitation emphasizes the need for additional testing to understand the most efficacious platelet product available for trauma. However, traditional platelet function assays are often over- or under-potentiated to detect dysfunction, occurring both in the trauma patient receiving therapeutic platelet transfusion as well as in the transfused product itself seen in platelet storage lesions. Determining the origin of dysfunction can be challenging, given the limitations in current platelet function assays, including the static nature of most of these tests. Therefore, when studying hemostatic resuscitation in vitro, the platform and detection methods for both recipient and product platelet populations are of critical importance in determining optimal therapeutic interventions.
Microfluidic testing offers flow profiles and biofidelic surfaces to create a physiologically relevant assay on which to study platelets. Microfluidic devices can be customized to study particular pathophysiology or injury types, such as vessel puncture19 or endothelial damage20. These devices are generally comprised of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) bonded to a glass microscope slide with surface modifications, such as collagen, to mimic sub-endothelium and tissue injury. Utilizing these types of flow-based devices can aid in guiding trauma-related platelet dysfunction research and aid in examining optimal transfusion medicine approaches to ameliorate platelet dysfunction. These strategies may help to clarify the existing confusion about the relevance of static platelet assays such as aggregometry in the injured patient.
All research was performed in compliance with institutional guidelines. Approval from the University of Pittsburgh Human Research Protection Office was obtained and informed consent from healthy human volunteers was obtained.
1. Microfluidic device preparation
2. Blood sample preparation
3. Platelet function testing under flow (Method 1)
4. Platelet function testing under flow with low-volume samples (below 1 mL) (Method 2)
5. Decontamination
6. Image analysis
Microfluidic experiments following the use of this method should show platelet-rich thrombi formation in the region of stenosis of the flow channel (Figure 1). Figure 1A illustrates representative results where functional platelets formed a thrombus in the stenotic region of the channel to block blood flow through the channel. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) curves of kinetic images taken for the duration of the experiment illustrate a lag, growth, and plateau...
The above protocol has some critical steps to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of experiments. First, fluorescent antibodies should be carefully considered. The antibodies used to detect platelets in the sample should not block the function of the glycoprotein Ib (GPIb) platelet receptor. Lot matching, whenever possible between experiments, is also critical to ensure the reproducibility of the fluorescent signal. Another critical step in this protocol is using sterile consumables and solutions and filtered samp...
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
The authors acknowledge and thank all blood donors who participated, as well as the Trauma and Transfusion Medicine Research Lab phlebotomists and the UPMC Montefiore Clinical and Translational Research Center for assistance in collections. SMS is supported by K25HL161401. MDN is supported by 1R01HL166944-01A1.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Equipments | |||
Axio Observer | Zeiss | 491917-0001-000 | |
Bel-Art Space Saver Vacuum Desiccators | Fisher Scientific | 08-594-15A | |
Fisherbrand Isotemp Digital Hotplate Stirrer | Fisher Scientific | FB30786161 | |
Nutating Mixer | Fischer Scientific | 88-861-043 | |
OHAUS Scout Balance Scale | Uline | H-5852 | |
Oven | Fisher Scientific | 15-103-0520 | |
Plasma cleaner | Harrick | PDC-32G (115V) | |
Syringe Pump (PHD ULTRA CP, I/W PROGRAMMABLE) | Harvard Apparatus | 883015 | |
Zen 3.4 | Zeiss | Blue edition | Software |
Material | |||
1/16 inch ID - Barbed Elbow Connectors | Qosina | 11691 | |
10 mL syringe | Fischer Scientific | 14-955-459 | |
2-Hydroxypropyl-Ξ²-cyclodextrin | Cayman Chemicals | 16169 | 30% Dissolved in Phosphate buffered saline |
40-micron filters | Fischer Scientific | NC1469671 | |
CD41 antibody | Novus Biologicals | Β NB100-2614 | 1:600 Ratio in Whole Blood |
Chrono-Par Collagen Reagent | Chrono Log Corporation | 385 | 1:5 Ratio in 0.9% Saline |
Electron Microscopy Sciences Miltex Biopsy Punch with Plunger, 3.0 mm | Fisher Scientific | NC0856599 | |
Eppendorf Snap-Cap Microcentrifuge SafeLock Tubes, 1.5 mL | Fisher Scientific | 05-402-25 | |
Essendant 121oz. Clorox Germicidal Bleach | Fischer Scientific | 50371500 | |
Ethanol | Fisher Scientific | 07-678-005 | 70% |
Falcon Safety Dust Off DPSXLRCP Compressed Gas | Supra | 1381978 | |
Human TruStain | Biolegend | 422302 | 1:600 Ratio in Whole Blood |
LevGo smartSpatula Disposable Polypropylene Spatula | Fisher Scientific | 18-001-017 | |
Microscope Slides | Fisher Scientific | 12-550-A3 | |
Phosphate buffered saline | Gibco | 10010-023 | |
Safety Scalpel | Fisher Scientific | 22-079-718 | |
Saline | Millipore | 567442 | 0.90% |
Sartorius Polystyrene Weighing Boats | Fisher Scientific | 13-735-744 | |
Superslip Cover Slips - Superslip No. 1.5 | Fisher Scientific | 12-541-055 | |
SYLGARD 184 Silicone Elastomer Kit | Fisher Scientific | NC9285739 | Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) |
Ticagrelor | Cayman Chemicals | 15425 | |
Tygon PVC Clear Tubing 1/16" ID, 1/8" OD, 50 ft length | McMaster-Carr | 6516T11 | |
Ultra-Machinable 360 Brass Bar | McMaster-Carr | 8954K721 | For master mold fabrication |
Vacutainers | BD | 363083 | |
World Precision Instrument Reusable Biopsy Punch, 1.5mm | Fisher Scientific | NC1215626 |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionExplore More Articles
This article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved