A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
The protocol shows a novel in vitro experimental model that can recapitulate the biology of two kinds of adherent cell lines with a three-dimensional (3D)-printed scaffold. The construction of this model and operating procedures, from cell preparation and cell culture to analysis and evaluation, are described.
Embryo implantation is affected by the interactions among different cell types in the mother-embryo interface. The direct and indirect communications between various cell types within the decidua are crucial for regulating endometrial receptivity; however, the molecular mechanisms mediating this interaction are still unclear. In this regard, a model to study the implantation process is needed to establish a comprehensive in vitro model that can recapitulate the biology of endometrial epithelium-stroma interaction. This model is composed of regular cell-culture plates and a matching scaffold, which is generated by three-dimensional (3D) printing from low-cost materials. Here, we detail a set of protocols for model construction, cell preparation, cell seeding, cell culture, observation, and evaluation. Furthermore, we have included representative results with cells exhibiting good growth conditions under the microscope. This study aimed to develop in vitro models that would mimic the interaction between endometrial stromal cells and epithelial cells, as well as between trophoblast cells and endometrial cells.
Despite extensive research on human pregnancy, the molecular mechanisms at the maternal-fetal interface during implantation and early pregnancy remain poorly understood1. The human endometrium is mainly composed of two cell types: endometrial epithelial cells (EECs) and endometrial stromal cells (ESCs). Implantation progresses through three stages: apposition, attachment, and invasion, which lead to the development of a competent embryo and receptive endometrium2. Considering the ethical constraints of in vivo studies on human subjects, as well as the difficulties in simulating the human condition in animals completely, the construction of in vitro human endometrium culture models has become an effective means of replicating the implantation and early pregnancy processes3. These models are valuable in investigating both normal and pathological pregnancies and provide a foundational platform for the preliminary testing and validation of therapeutic interventions in translational medicine.
Commercial chambers have been widely utilized in cellular biological research. These chambers offer valuable insights into cell migration and the crosstalk between different types of cells. However, commercial chambers are typically single-use and can be costly4.
A great number of in vitro human culture models consisting of endometrium and blastocyst, or blastocyst surrogates, have been developed to better understand the detailed process of implantation. These models, however, are still in their initial stage of application since the 3D structure is a highly complicated experimental setup, and certain specific differentiation media are expensive5,6,7.
The use of affordable 3D-printing hardware and a relatively short manufacturing period makes it possible to fit structures to target different experimental purposes. 3D printing techniques help reduce time costs and enable the creation of complex, customized structures. This technology significantly accelerates prototype design and iteration, making it a valuable tool for researchers across various fields, allowing them to complete their work more efficiently8,9,10.
Here, we present a feasible and economical experimental protocol for the construction of the 3D structure and its use as the cell culture system, which can simulate the interaction between endometrial stromal and epithelial cells for investigation of the endometrial receptivity during embryo implantation. This provides a customizable and low-cost alternative for commercial disposable material.
NOTE: All reagents used in this protocol can be found in the Table of Materials. Unless otherwise specified, all media were pre-equilibrated to 37 Β°C before use.
1. 3DΒ printing of the scaffold and model construction
NOTE: The steps here were performed according to the manual book of the commercial 3D-metal printing machine. The steps are briefly described below (Supplementary File 1).
2. Preparation for cell co-culture in the 3D model
NOTE: It is recommended that high-temperature resistant materials be used as consumables for 3D printing cell coverslip scaffold supports to facilitate autoclave sterilization before each use in cell culture experiments. Immortalized Human Endometrial Stromal Cells (HESC) and human endometrial epithelial cells (Ishikawa) were used in this study. The characterization of these cell lines has been previously reported5,6.
3. Assembly of the co-culture model
4. Image acquisition
5. Image processing
6. Cell harvesting
Figure 1Β shows the homemade scaffold for cell slides used in this process, which comprises an upper support ring tailored for attachment to standard 12-well cell culture plates, complemented by a basal cell slide holder featuring four L-shaped rod-like structures.
According to Figure 2, the density of both cell types in the co-culture condition (Figure 2A,B) remained low after 72 h o...
A simplified and cost-effective protocol is described for the indirect co-culture of endometrial stromal and epithelial cells. This method utilizes a homemade scaffold for cell slides, which comprises an upper support ring tailored for attachment to standard 12-well cell culture plates, complemented by a basal cell slide holder featuring four L-shaped rod-like structures. This setup facilitates the separation of endometrial stromal and epithelial cells while allowing for their interaction through the exchange of signalin...
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
We want to thank all the subjects involved in this study. We also appreciate the imaging assistance by Light Innovation Technology Ltd, Shenzhen. This study was supported by Natural Science Funding of China (Grant No. 82201851), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Grant No. JCYJ20210324141403009, RCYX20210609104608036), Shenzhen Key Medical Discipline Construction Fund (Grant No. SZXK028), and Shenzhen Baoan Women's and Children's Hospital (Grant No. BAFY 2023003).
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
10x Hanksβ² Balanced Salt solution | Solarbio | H1046 | 1/10 |
12-well Clear TC-treated Plates | Corning | 3513 | - |
25 cmΒ² Cell Culture Flask | Corning | 430639 | - |
Aluminum | Markforged | 6061-T6 | - |
DMEM/F12 | Sigma-aldrich | D2906 | - |
Dulbeccoβs Modified Eagle MediumΒ | Gibco | C11995500BT | |
FBS | Gibco | 10099141C | 1/10 |
Fetal bovine serum | Gibco | 10099141C | |
ITS Premix | Biocoat | 354350 | 1/100 |
Matrigel Matrix | Corning | 354248 | ECM |
Metal X | Markforged | M F-PR-5000 | - |
Penicillin-Streptomycin | Gibco | 15140122 | 1/100 |
Round Coverslip | Biosharp | BS-18-RC | - |
TrypLE Select (10X) | Gibco | A1217701 | dissociation enzyme |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright Β© 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved