preparation and imaging of free-hand leaf sections for assessing the anatomical differences between c3 and c4 leaf

Microscopical Analysis for Enhancing Photosynthetic Efficiency in C&lt;sub&gt;4&lt;/sub&gt; Crops

Photosynthesis is a fundamental process where light energy is converted into chemical energy, serving as the cornerstone of terrestrial trophic networks. The majority of plants follow the C3 pathway of photosynthesis, where the primary photosynthetic product is the three-carbon compound glycerate 3-phosphate. C3 photosynthesis evolved over 2 billion years ago in the atmosphere abundant in CO2 and low in O21. The key photosynthetic enzyme ribulose 1,5 bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), which evolved under these conditions, is suboptimal for current low CO2 high O2 conditions as it competitively reacts with O2, initiating photorespiration2. Photorespiration is a wasteful pathway that consumes energy instead of producing it and releasing CO2 as a byproduct. Consequently, it is crucial to maintain high CO2 concentration around Rubisco in chloroplasts to prevent oxygenation3,4. Due to the inability of C3 plants to concentrate CO2, there is a significant CO2 drawdown from ambient air to chloroplasts, curbing photosynthesis and affecting plant growth and biomass production2,5,6.
In C3 plants, photosynthesis is limited by the entrance of CO2 through stomata, its diffusion through the mesophyll, and the biochemical activity of photosynthetic enzymes. The entry of CO2 is first limited by stomatal conductance, which is controlled by environmental conditions such as air temperature and humidity. Then CO2 diffuses through the leaf&#39;s internal gaseous and liquid phase to Rubisco7. In C3 plants, all stages of photosynthesis occur in the chloroplasts of mesophyll cells, and plants need to maintain a constant influx of CO2 from the atmosphere into chloroplasts. The dependence of CO2 availability in chloroplasts on stomatal openness, mesophyll architecture, and individual cell and chloroplast characteristics leaves plants susceptible to environmental constraints that eventually affect photosynthesis, like low water availability and high temperatures7,8,9,10, particularly highlighting their vulnerability to climate change conditions11.
Given the challenges posed by the inefficiencies of the C3 pathway, as well as limitations in maintaining optimal CO2 levels and susceptibility to environmental factors, in certain plants, another pathway, the C4 photosynthesis pathway, has evolved. Characteristically, C4 plants have two spatially separated biochemical pathways; the initial CO2 fixation occurs in mesophyll cells by phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase, which has a higher affinity for CO2 than Rubisco and also lacks oxygenation activity. The formed C4 product is further transported to bundle sheath cells, where it is decarboxylated, and CO2 is again released and fixed by Rubisco (C3 photosynthesis)12,13,14. The greater affinity of PEP carboxylase to CO2 and thick cell walls of bundle sheath cells allows CO2 concentration in bundle sheath cells, and thus, C4 plants minimize the photorespiration by spatially segregating CO2 fixation and the Calvin cycle. The adoption of the C4 pathway showcases nature&#39;s adaptive response to environmental constraints, offering insights into potential strategies for improving crop productivity and resilience in changing climate conditions15.
The specialized anatomy of the leaf structure in C4 plants is characterized by veins surrounded by enlarged vascular bundle sheath cells containing chloroplasts and with a radial arrangement of mesophyll cells in an outer ring patterning around bundle sheath cells. The mesophyll cells are in close proximity to the bundle sheath cells, which enables a rapid and continuous transport of metabolites between the two cell types. This cell&#39;s arrangement is typical of C4 plants and is referred to as Kranz anatomy16. In C3 species, mesophyll cell specialization and disposition can vary, but bundle sheath cells are distinctly smaller and have a few chloroplasts or no chloroplasts at all. Specific Kranz anatomy allows concentrating CO2 in chloroplasts in bundle sheath cells where the C3-carboxylating enzyme Rubisco is located, effectively hindering photorespiration4, 17, 18. Despite its seemingly complex arrangement, these changes have occurred independently multiple times in the evolution of angiosperms, indicating that it is a relatively feasible evolutionary pathway19,20,21, and various taxa have been shown to be at an intermediate stage between C3 and C4 carbon metabolism, referred to as C3-C4 or C2, having abilities to concentrate and re-assimilate CO222,23,24,25.
Many C4 plants are crops with high economic importance, and genetically engineering C3 crops, like rice, to improve their climate resilience and secure the yield has been a topic of interest in the last decades26,27. However, the engineering efforts call for a detailed understanding of C4 specialized anatomy and how it controls photosynthesis2,28.
Establishing the C4 Kranz anatomy is a prerequisite to achieving the ambitious goal of engineering C4 photosynthesis into C3 crops25. However, the current understanding of the regulation of Kranz anatomy and methods for quickly screening its key anatomical traits is limited, making it difficult to identify hybrid species. Previous studies have shown that key traits regulating photosynthetic efficiency in C3 and C4 plants include the interveinal distance, the diameter of the bundle sheath complex, and the size of bundle sheath cells14,29. These traits can be easily screened using free-hand sections and quantitatively analyzed using semi-thin sections. Here, we describe the method of assessing the traits that allow for C3 and C4 anatomical differentiation diagnostics through free-hand cross and light microscopy, namely bundle sheath area, interveinal distance, and vein frequency.

Author Spotlight: Innovative Approaches to Understanding Plant Structure-Function Relationships for Climate-Resilient Crops

Assessing Structural Traits in Triticum aestivum and Zea mays for C3 and C4 Photosynthetic Differentiation Using Free-hand and Semi-thin Sections

Our research focuses on plant structure, function relationships. We aim to better understand the limitations to photosynthesis across plant functional types and how they can be improved for climate-resilient crops. New technology and software are expensive and often inaccessible, which requires a degree of trial and innovation to accomplish the same resolutions in imaging different plant functional types.The identification of anatomical structures that differentiate C3 and C4 leaves, particularly in as well as troubleshooting the preparative steps for microscopy.

Preparation and Imaging of Free-Hand Leaf Sections for Assessing the Anatomical Differences Between C3 and C4 Leaf

To begin, grow wheat and maize plant species in an environment controlled growth chamber. Select three mature non-senescent leaves from the wheat plant and keep them in distilled water. Then place the leaf specimen on a glass plate on a piece of dental wax to stabilize the sample and avoid slipping.Move the blade straight down on the leaf specimen to cut cleanly through cells, and keep the cross sections in distilled water. To mount the samples on a glass slide, place them on a water droplet and cover them with a glass cover slip for microscopic imaging. Now view the slide under a compound light microscope at 10X and 20X magnification.Save images as per the software guide along with the relevant scale. Freehand sections of leaves from the C3 plant Triticum aestivum and the C4 plant Zm Maize revealed that maize's bundle sheath cells are rounder and greener, indicating a higher chloroplast presence.

preparation-imaging-free-hand-leaf-sections-for-assessing-anatomical

Research

JoVE Journal

Biology

58 Aufrufe. Bauen Sie zunächst Weizen- und Maispflanzenarten in einer umweltkontrollierten Wachstumskammer an. Wählen Sie drei reife, nicht alternde Blätter der Weizenpflanze aus und bewahren Sie sie in destilliertem Wasser auf. Legen Sie dann die Blattprobe auf eine Glasplatte auf ein Stück Zahnwachs, um die Probe zu stabilisieren und ein Verrutschen zu vermeiden.Bewegen Sie die Klinge gerade nach unten auf die Blattprobe, um sauber durch die Zellen zu schnei...

Serie: Präparation und Bildgebung von freihändigen Blattschnitten zur Beurteilung der anatomischen Unterschiede zwischen C3 und C4 Blatt

The enhanced efficiency of C4 photosynthesis, compared to the C3 mechanism, arises from its ability to concentrate CO2 in bundle sheath cells. The effectiveness of C4 photosynthesis and intrinsic water use efficiency are directly linked to the share of mesophyll and bundle leaf cells,&#160;size and density of bundle sheaths, and size, density, and cell wall thickness of bundle sheath cells. Rapid microscopical analysis of these traits can be performed on free-hand and semi-thin sections using conventional light microscopy, providing valuable information about photosynthetic efficiency in C4 crops by means of identifying and examining specific cell types. Additionally, errors in freehand and semi-thin section preparation that affect anatomical measurements and cell type diagnoses are shown, as well as how to avoid these errors. This microscopical approach offers an efficient means of gathering insights into photosynthetic acclimation to environmental variation and aids in the rapid screening of crops for future climates.

Assessing the anatomical differences between C3 and C4 leaf cross sections helps understand photosynthesis efficiency. This paper describes free-hand and semi-thin leaf cross sections preparation and examination, along with the caveats in the preparation for the crop species Triticum aestivum and Zea mays.

The enhanced efficiency of C4 photosynthesis, compared to the C3 mechanism, arises from its ability to concentrate CO2 in bundle sheath cells. The ...

Preparation of Semi-Thin Leaf Sections to Understand Photosynthesis Efficiency Based on Anatomical Differences

Begin by cutting sections from intercostal areas alongside the midrib of leaves from Triticum aestivum on a glass plate. Ensure that the length of the cut section runs along the grain of the leaf. Then place the plant material in a syringe with one milliliter of fixation buffer.Hold the syringe vertically. Remove the air and pump the syringe to create a vacuum holding a finger on the tip. After performing the complete infiltration protocol, as per the resin manufacturer's instructions, cover the cavities of a flat embedding mold with 100%resin, and place the samples on one end of the cavity.Prepare pencil written paper labels for each sample and place them on the other end of the cavity. Straighten the samples and labels if they moved. Cover the mold with the embedding film and polymerize in an oven as per acrylic resin product guidelines.Then set the polymerized block with the sample in the ultra microtome specimen holder. Using a rough glass knife, trim the block until the tissue becomes visible and excess resin is eliminated. Next, using a glass or diamond knife cuts semi thin sections transversely.With a metal inoculation loop, collect the sections from the water surface and place them on a glass slide. Dry the slide on a hot plate to fix the sections onto the glass. Stain the fixed sections with toluidine blue for five seconds.Semi thin cross sections of Triticum aestivum and Zea mays showed that all leaf tissues were visible and measurable. Zea mays exhibited crans anatomy with mesophyll cells around veins and chloroplast-filled bundle sheaths facilitating rapid metabolite exchange.

Imaging Resin-Infiltrated Leaf Sections for Understanding Anatomical Differences Between Triticum aestivum and Zea mays

After staining the Triticum aestivum leaf section with toluidine blue, place the slide on the microscope stage. Using a 40x objective magnification, focus on the section and adjust the brightness to ensure all cell structures are visible. Then use the navigator function to set the sections location area to ensure the entire section is imaged, then click the stitch button.After that, click done and run to allow the microscope to image the entire section. Open the image analysis software and the tiles taken by the microscope. Using the align feature, ensure that the tiles do not overlap.After generating the image, adjust the positioning, brightness, and rotation using the adjust tab. Then print the scale on the image before saving it in TIF format. Open ImageJ software and drag the image into the window to load it.Using the line tool, draw a line over the scale bar. Choose analyze and click set scale. Change the known distance to the scale bar's length and the unit of length to the correct unit.To measure the prospective trait, select the line tool, draw a line across the area of interest and press the M key. For area measurements, use the polygon selection tool to outline the tissue of interest. Then press the M key to conclude.A pop-up window displaying the measurements will appear, which can be copied to a spreadsheet for further data analysis. Box plots illustrated significant anatomical differences between Triticum aestivum and ZMAs, particularly in interveinal distances, bundle sheath diameter, the fraction of bundle sheath cells, non-photo synthetic material, and vein frequency reflecting expected C3 and C4 leaf anatomy distinctions.