A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Technical advances and increased experience in full-endoscopic spinal surgeries enable these procedures to be performed with minimal incision, muscle retraction, and bone removal.
For lateral recess stenosis, extensive decompression with laminectomy is still performed in most centers. However, tissue-sparing surgeries are becoming more common. Full-endoscopic spinal surgeries have the advantages of being less invasive and offering a shorter recovery time. Here, we describe the technique of the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach for the decompression of lateral recess stenosis. The full-endoscopic interlaminar approach for the lateral recess stenosis procedure took approximately 51 min (range of 39-66 min). Blood loss could not be measured due to continuous irrigation. However, no drainage was required. There were no dura mater injuries reported in our institution. Furthermore, there were no injuries to the nerves, no cauda equine syndrome, and no hematoma formation. The patients were mobilized on the same day as surgery and discharged the next day. Therefore, the full-endoscopic technique for lateral recess stenosis decompression is a feasible procedure that lowers the operational time, complications, traumatization, and rehabilitation duration.
Spinal stenosis, both central and lateral recess stenosis, is the most common pathology in the elderly population1. Lateral recess stenosis can cause symptoms of neurogenic claudication, radicular pain, and motor and sensory deficits. If present, back pain is usually attributed to accompanying segmental instability2,3.
Numerous surgical procedures have been described to date, some of which are still controversial4. Over the years, the trend has developed from more aggressive to more selective and minimally invasive techniques. In conventional surgery, epidural fibrosis and scarring may become symptomatic, making revision surgery more difficult. It may cause surgery-induced instability due to unnecessary bone removal and tissue damage5,6.
The stenotic zone in lumbar spinal stenosis can be in the central, lateral recess, or intervertebral foramen. The full-endoscopic approach depends on the pathology and the surgeon's preferences, and can be interlaminar, transforaminal, or extraforaminal7,8. The anatomy of the foramen and the exiting nerve can make the foraminal approaches challenging. Therefore, the interlaminar approach enables better access and understanding of the pathology and the opportunity to decompress. Patient selection is important; patients with ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, facet joint hypertrophy, and sequestered and non-sequestered disc herniations can be operated on with this technique, and these pathologies can be addressed. Patients with compressive foraminal or extraforaminal pathologies, extensive spinal canal stenoses, a significant bony shift in the interlaminar window, and instability in the spinal canal are excluded. The goal of this study is to describe the full-endoscopic interlaminar approach for lumbar lateral recess stenosis.
The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of the Istanbul Faculty of Medicine.
1. Preoperative procedures
2. Surgical technique
3. Postoperative procedures and follow-up
The preoperative and postoperative sagittal and axial magnetic resonance images (MRIs) show right-sided lateral recess stenosis. (Figure 1). Due to the continuous irrigation and suction system in full-endoscopic surgery, the blood loss could not be measured. However, postoperative hemoglobin levels indicate that no significant blood loss is experienced. Early postoperative mobilization is encouraged for the patients, who are usually discharged the day after. A lumbar corset is not required s...
Conventional surgeries for lateral recess stenosis decompression include laminectomy and extensive resection of the soft and bony tissues4. Epidural fibrosis and scarring can be problematic, become symptomatic, and make revision surgery more complex9. Resection of the posterior musculature and the bony elements can cause surgery-induced segmental instability10. This has led to the need for more tissue-sparing surgeries. Technical advances have e...
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study.
There is no funding source for this study.
Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
Burr Oval Ø 5.5 mm | RiwoSpine | 899751505 | PACK = 1 PC, WL 290 mm, with lateral protection |
C-arm | ZIEHM SOLO | C-arm with integrated monitor | |
Dilator ID 1.1 mm OD 9.4 mm | RiwoSpine | 892209510 | For single-stage dilatation, TL 235 mm, reusable |
Endoscope | RiwoSpine | 892103253 | 20 degrees viewing angle and 177 mm length with a 9.3 mm diameter oval shaft with a 5.6 mm diameter working channel |
Kerrison Punch 5.5 mm X 4.5 mm WL 380 mm | RiwoSpine | 892409445 | 60°, TL 460 mm, hinged pushrod, reusable |
Punch Ø 3 mm WL 290 mm | RiwoSpine | 89240.3023 | TL 388 mm, with irrigation connection, reusable |
Punch Ø 5.4 mm WL 340 mm | RiwoSpine | 892409020 | TL 490 mm, with irrigation connection, reusable |
Radioablator RF BNDL | RiwoSpine | 23300011 | |
RF Instrument BIPO Ø 2.5 mm WL 280 mm | RiwoSpine | 4993691 | for endoscopic spine surgery, flexible insert, integrated connection cable WL 3 m with device plug to Radioblator RF 4 MHz, sterile, for single use |
Rongeur Ø 3 mm WL 290 mm | RiwoSpine | 89240.3003 | TL 388 mm, with irrigation connection, reusable |
Working sleeve ID 9.5 mm OD 10.5 mm | RiwoSpine | 8922095000 | TL 120, distal end beveled, graduated, reusable |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request PermissionThis article has been published
Video Coming Soon
Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved