A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Summary

Intraparenchymal hemorrhage and neuroinflammation accompanied by cerebral contusion can trigger severe secondary brain injury. This protocol details a mouse controlled cortical impact (CCI) model allowing researchers to study hemorrhage contusion and post-traumatic immune responses and explore potential therapeutics.

Abstract

Cerebral contusion is a severe medical problem affecting millions of people worldwide each year. There is an urgent need to understand the pathophysiological mechanism and to develop effective therapeutic strategy for this devastating neurological disorder. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage and post-traumatic inflammatory response induced by initial physical impact can aggravate microglia/macrophage activation and neuroinflammation which subsequently worsen brain pathology. We provide here a controlled cortical impact (CCI) protocol that can reproduce experimental cortical contusion in mice by using a pneumatic impactor system to deliver mechanical force with controllable magnitude and velocity onto the dural surface. This preclinical model allows researchers to induce moderately severe focal cerebral contusion in mice and to investigate a wide range of post-traumatic pathological progressions including hemorrhage contusion, microglia/macrophage activation, iron toxicity, axonal injury, as well as short-term and long-term neurobehavioral deficits. The present protocol can be useful for exploring the long-term effects of and potential interventions for cerebral contusion.

Introduction

Cerebral contusion is a form of traumatic brain injury that ranks high among the deadliest health issues in modern society1. It is primarily caused by accidental events such as traffic accident that results in external forces applying mechanical energy to the head. Traumatic brain injury affects an approximate of 3.5 million people and accounts for 30% of all acute injury-related deaths in the US each year2. Patients who survive cerebral contusion oftentimes suffer from long-term consequences including focal motor weakness, sensory dysfunction, and mental illness1.

The primary injury of cerebral contusion is induced by mechanical factors including stretching and tearing forces, leading to immediate parenchymal structure deformation and focal CNS cell death3. Hemorrhage contusion is a general term for brain hemorrhages due to vascular tear at the site of head trauma4. Specifically, intraparenchymal hemorrhage occurs immediately after a cerebral contusion leading to delayed hematoma formation. Within the hematoma, hemoglobin and free iron released from the lysed red blood cells can further trigger blood-related toxicity5,6 which cause herniation, brain edema, and intracranial pressure elevation5,6. The collaborative functions of neurons (axons), glia, blood vessels, and supportive tissue are also compromised by the mass effect of hematoma7. Additionally, persistent and diffuse neuroinflammation with progressive neurodegeneration continue for months and cause secondary damage in the brain8.

Microglia activation is one of many important pathological features of cerebral contusion9,10. After sensing the damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and leaked blood in the injured tissue, activated microglia trigger neuroinflammation which furthers secondary brain damage11. In addition, chemoattractant released from microglia promotes peripheral immune cell infiltration into the traumatic territory resulting in production of reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory cytokines. This creates a self-perpetuating pro-inflammatory environment which triggers progressive brain injury9,12. Meanwhile, microglia with an alternatively activated phenotype can contribute to tissue homeostatic restoration and brain repair through clearing debris from the injured tissue13. Prevention of secondary neuroinflammation by reducing detrimental microglial immune responses has been shown to be particularly useful for promoting brain recovery from cerebral contusion3,9,10,12.

Several preclinical models have been developed for studying traumatic brain injury including weight-drop model, lateral fluid percussion injury, and blast wave model14,15. However, these models each have their weakness including high mortality rate during the procedure, low reproducibility of histological results, and high variability of inflicted injury between laboratories16,17. In comparison, the controlled cortical impact (CCI) model is more adequate for studying focal cerebral contusion because of its precise control and high reproducibility14,15,18,19.

Furthermore, through manipulating the biomechanical deformation parameters such as velocity and depth of impact, the severity of the induced damage can be controlled to produce a wide range of injury magnitudes, allowing researchers to mimic different levels of impairment oftentimes seen in patients17. The preclinical model of CCI was first developed in 189620. Since then, CCI has been the broadest applicable model to be modified for the use in primates21, swine22, sheep23, rats24, and mice25. Together these features make CCI one of the most suitable experimental cerebral contusion models26.

Our laboratory uses a commercially available pneumatic CCI impact system and tested biomechanical deformation parameters to produce moderately severe focal cerebral contusion that territorializes the primary sensory and motor cortical areas without damaging the hippocampus27,28. We and others demonstrated that this CCI procedure can be used to study clinical features of human cerebral contusion including brain tissue loss, neuronal injury, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, neuroinflammation, and sensorimotor deficiency24,25,27,28,29,30. Here, we detail a standard protocol to perform mouse CCI which allows one to ask questions regarding CCI-induced myelin loss, iron deposition, CNS inflammation, hemorrhagic toxicity and the responses of microglia/macrophages in the aftermath of focal cerebral contusion.

Protocol

All procedures described in this protocol were conducted under the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Cheng Hsin General Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine. Eight- to ten-week-old male C57BL/6 wild type mice were used in this protocol.

1. Anesthesia induction

  1. Anesthetize the mouse with ~4% isoflurane mixed with room air at ~0.2 L/min in an induction chamber connected to the isoflurane vaporizer.
  2. Ensure the respiratory pattern is smooth. Check the depth of anesthesia by confirming a lack of toe-pinch reflex in the animal.

2. Pre-surgical preparation

  1. Shave the mouse head with electrical clippers in a caudal to rostral direction. Do not trim the mouse whiskers.
    NOTE: Loss of whiskers may influence the accuracy of subsequent behavioral test results.
  2. Place the mouse onto the stereotaxic frame. Carefully insert the ear bars into the ear canals. Ensure the mouse head is stabilized by both ear bars equally.
  3. Bring in the nose cone and maintain anesthesia at 1% - 2% isoflurane for the duration of the surgery.
  4. Apply petroleum jelly to both eyes to prevent drying out during the surgery. Keep the animal on a heating pad to maintain a body temperature of 37 ˚C.
  5. Disinfect the shaved head with betadine followed by 70% alcohol using sterile cotton swabs. Repeat three times.

3. CCI surgery

  1. Administer 100 µL of Bupivacaine (0.25%) subcutaneously using a 31 G insulin needle prior to the incision. Gently massage the injection site for better absorption.
    NOTE: This local anesthetic provides pain relief directly at the site of surgery.
  2. Make a longitudinal incision (~1.5 cm) along the midline on the scalp with a scalpel or scissors. Use a hemostat to hold the skin off to the right side and allow the exposed skull to dry for 1 min. Use a sterile cotton swab to clean away any residual blood and tissues on the skull.
  3. Check that the mouse head is level in the horizontal plane.
    1. Identify anatomical landmarks Bregma and Lambda and mark both locations with a pencil.
    2. Ensure that the head of the animal is level in the rostral-caudal direction. Do this by measuring the Z coordinates of both Bregma and Lambda using a 31 G insulin needle attached to the stereotaxic frame.
      NOTE: Adjust the ear bar vertically if necessary.
    3. Perform for the horizontal positioning of the animal head by following the same procedure of checking the Z coordinates at the midline along with two corresponding locations on the left and right side of the midline and adjust the ear bars if needed.
      NOTE: A level and stable placement of the animal head is crucial for the reproducibility and reliability of the CCI model.
  4. Use the same 31 G insulin needle to identify the craniectomy site. Set the XY origin to Bregma and laterally move the needle 3 mm to the right. Mark this position as the site of craniectomy and draw a circle 4 mm in diameter on the skull with a pencil.
  5. Use a high-speed micro drill with a trephine (4 mm diameter) to cut along the pencil-outlined circle to create a 4 mm diameter open hole. Use a speed setting of 20,000 rpm. Avoid applying excess pressure.
    NOTE: Perform this step quickly (usually within 30 s to 1 min) to prevent any thermal damage to the brain. Applying excess pressure while drilling may lead to accidental penetration that could compress and injure the brain surface.
  6. Carefully remove the bone flap with tweezer and temporally store it in ice cold normal saline. Gently rinse the hole with normal saline before applying pressure on the brain surface with the cotton swab tip to stop bleeding.
  7. Set the 2.5 mm diameter rounded impactor tip on the CCI device to an angle of 22.5˚. Zero the impact tip to the dural surface. Set the impact parameters on the control box to a velocity of 4 m/s and a deformation depth of 2 mm. Retract the metal tip.
    NOTE: Zeroing the tip while it is statically and slightly pressed against the dural surface in the full stroke position improves the accuracy of the zero point and the reproducibility of the injury level.
  8. Discharge the piston to generate impaction on the brain. Place a sterile cotton swab onto the injured area to stop bleeding.
  9. Place the bone flap back to the mouse brain and secure with dental cement. Close the scalp with tissue adhesive (e.g., 3M Vetbond).

4. Postoperative recovery

  1. Place the mouse in a clean recovery cage with bedding under the heat lamp until full recovery.
  2. Provide moistened chow food and subcutaneously administer ketoprofen (5 mg/kg) for two consecutive days after surgery.
  3. Perform the above procedures except steps 3.7 and 3.8 for sham control animals.

5. Mouse euthanasia

  1. Euthanize mice on the day of study by isoflurane overdose and then decapitation.
    NOTE: Several strategies can be used to euthanize the experimental animals prior to the sample collection.
  2. Collect brain samples for histological analysis.

Results

Illustration of stereotactic placement and craniotomy procedure.

The CCI model is known for its stability and reproducibility in producing injury ranging from mild to severe18. Proper stereotactic technique and craniotomy procedure are major determinants in producing stable and reproducible CCI-induced brain injury (Figure 1A,B). An ideal craniotomy procedure would cause minimal histological injury in the s...

Discussion

The CCI protocol produces highly reproducible mechanical injury to the brain for cerebral contusion research. The following steps are crucial for generating consistent brain injury in animals using this CCI protocol.

First, the mouse head should be stably mounted on the stereotaxic frame and the anatomical landmarks Bregma and Lambda always in the same horizontal plane. Unsteady or unlevel head placement oftentimes result in varied injury levels between animals. To ensure the animal head is sa...

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Danye Jiang for editing the manuscript and insightful input. We thank Jhih Syuan Lin for assisting in manuscript preparation. This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST 107-2320-B-002-063-MY2) to C.F.C.

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
4mm Short Trephine DrillSalvin Dental Specialties, Inc.TREPH-SHORT-4
anti-Iba1 antibodyWako chemicals#019-19741
anti-Ly76 antibodyabcamab91113
carboxylate cement3M70201136010
cortical contusion injury impactorCustom Design & Fabrication, Inc.S/N 49-2004-C, eCCI Model 6.3CCI device (S/N 49-2004-C, eCCI Model 6.3)
cresyl violet acetateSigma-AldrichC5042
DAB staining kitVectorSK-4105
goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 488InvitrogenA11034
goat anti-rat IgG secondary antibody, Alexa Fluor 594InvitrogenA11007
Mayer's HematoxylinScyTekHMM500
tweezersfine science tools11252-20 NO. 5
isofluranePanion & BF Biotech Inc.
lithium carbonateSigma-Aldrich62470
steriotexic framestoelting
scissorsfine science tools14068-12
solvent blue 38Sigma-AldrichS3382

References

  1. Maas, A. I. R., et al. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. The Lancet Neurology. 16 (12), 987-1048 (2017).
  2. Taylor, C. A., Bell, J. M., Breiding, M. J., Xu, L. Traumatic Brain Injury-Related Emergency Department Visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries. 66 (9), 1-16 (2007).
  3. Pearn, M. L., et al. Pathophysiology Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury: Current Treatments and Potential Novel Therapeutics. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. 37 (4), 571-585 (2017).
  4. Nyanzu, M., et al. Improving on Laboratory Traumatic Brain Injury Models to Achieve Better Results. International Journal of Medical Sciences. 14 (5), 494-505 (2017).
  5. Zhao, M., et al. Iron-induced neuronal damage in a rat model of post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuroscience. 330, 90-99 (2016).
  6. Cepeda, S., et al. Contrecoup Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Geometric Study of the Impact Site and Association with Hemorrhagic Progression. Journal of Neurotrauma. 33 (11), 1034-1046 (2016).
  7. Robicsek, S. A., Bhattacharya, A., Rabai, F., Shukla, K., Dore, S. Blood-Related Toxicity after Traumatic Brain Injury: Potential Targets for Neuroprotection. Molecular Neurobiology. 57 (1), 159-178 (2020).
  8. Morganti-Kossmann, M. C., Semple, B. D., Hellewell, S. C., Bye, N., Ziebell, J. M. The complexity of neuroinflammation consequent to traumatic brain injury: from research evidence to potential treatments. Acta Neuropathologica. 137 (5), 731-755 (2019).
  9. Ramlackhansingh, A. F., et al. Inflammation after trauma: microglial activation and traumatic brain injury. Annals of Neurology. 70 (3), 374-383 (2011).
  10. Wang, G. H., et al. Microglia/macrophage polarization dynamics in white matter after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism. 33 (12), 1864-1874 (2013).
  11. Karve, I. P., Taylor, J. M., Crack, P. J. The contribution of astrocytes and microglia to traumatic brain injury. British Journal of Pharmacology. 173 (4), 692-702 (2016).
  12. Huber-Lang, M., Lambris, J. D., Ward, P. A. Innate immune responses to trauma. Nature Immunology. 19 (4), 327-341 (2018).
  13. Russo, M. V., McGavern, D. B. Inflammatory neuroprotection following traumatic brain injury. Science. 353 (6301), 783-785 (2016).
  14. Xiong, Y., Mahmood, A., Chopp, M. Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 14 (2), 128-142 (2013).
  15. Johnson, V. E., Meaney, D. F., Cullen, D. K., Smith, D. H. Animal models of traumatic brain injury. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 127, 115-128 (2015).
  16. Albert-Weissenberger, C., Siren, A. L. Experimental traumatic brain injury. Experimental & Translational Stroke Medicine. 2 (1), 16 (2010).
  17. Ma, X., Aravind, A., Pfister, B. J., Chandra, N., Haorah, J. Animal Models of Traumatic Brain Injury and Assessment of Injury Severity. Molecular Neurobiology. 56 (8), 5332-5345 (2019).
  18. Osier, N. D., Korpon, J. R., Dixon, C. E., Kobeissy, F. H. Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects. Frontiers in Neuroengineering. , (2015).
  19. Osier, N. D., Dixon, C. E. The Controlled Cortical Impact Model: Applications, Considerations for Researchers, and Future Directions. Frontiers in Neurology. 7, 134 (2016).
  20. Kramer, S. P. A Contribution to the Theory of Cerebral Concussion. Annals of Surgery. 23 (2), 163-173 (1896).
  21. King, C., et al. Brain temperature profiles during epidural cooling with the ChillerPad in a monkey model of traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 27 (10), 1895-1903 (2010).
  22. Costine, B. A., et al. Neuron-specific enolase, but not S100B or myelin basic protein, increases in peripheral blood corresponding to lesion volume after cortical impact in piglets. Journal of Neurotrauma. 29 (17), 2689-2695 (2012).
  23. Anderson, R. W., Brown, C. J., Blumbergs, P. C., McLean, A. J., Jones, N. R. Impact mechanics and axonal injury in a sheep model. Journal of Neurotrauma. 20 (10), 961-974 (2003).
  24. Chen, S., Pickard, J. D., Harris, N. G. Time course of cellular pathology after controlled cortical impact injury. Experimental Neurology. 182 (1), 87-102 (2003).
  25. Lee, H. F., Lin, J. S., Chang, C. F. Acute Kahweol Treatment Attenuates Traumatic Brain Injury Neuroinflammation and Functional Deficits. Nutrients. 11 (10), 2301 (2019).
  26. Dixon, C. E., Clifton, G. L., Lighthall, J. W., Yaghmai, A. A., Hayes, R. L. A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 39 (3), 253-262 (1991).
  27. Hung, T. H., et al. Deletion or inhibition of soluble epoxide hydrolase protects against brain damage and reduces microglia-mediated neuroinflammation in traumatic brain injury. Oncotarget. 8 (61), 103236-103260 (2017).
  28. Wu, C. H., et al. Post-injury treatment with 7,8-dihydroxyflavone, a TrkB receptor agonist, protects against experimental traumatic brain injury via PI3K/Akt signaling. PLoS One. 9 (11), 113397 (2014).
  29. Chen, S. F., Su, W. S., Wu, C. H., Lan, T. H., Yang, F. Y. Transcranial Ultrasound Stimulation Improves Long-Term Functional Outcomes and Protects Against Brain Damage in Traumatic Brain Injury. Molecular Neurobiology. 55 (8), 7079-7089 (2018).
  30. Su, W. S., Wu, C. H., Chen, S. F., Yang, F. Y. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound improves behavioral and histological outcomes after experimental traumatic brain injury. Scientific Reports. 7 (1), 15524 (2017).
  31. Chen, S. F., et al. Salidroside improves behavioral and histological outcomes and reduces apoptosis via PI3K/Akt signaling after experimental traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 7 (9), 45763 (2012).
  32. Chen, C. C., et al. Berberine protects against neuronal damage via suppression of glia-mediated inflammation in traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 9 (12), 115694 (2014).
  33. Furmanski, O., Nieves, M. D., Doughty, M. L. Controlled Cortical Impact Model of Mouse Brain Injury with Therapeutic Transplantation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Cells. Journal of Visualized experiments. (149), e59561 (2019).
  34. Romine, J., Gao, X., Chen, J. Controlled cortical impact model for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Visualized experiments. (90), e51781 (2014).
  35. Saatman, K. E., Feeko, K. J., Pape, R. L., Raghupathi, R. Differential behavioral and histopathological responses to graded cortical impact injury in mice. Journal of Neurotrauma. 23 (8), 1241-1253 (2006).
  36. Robertson, C. L., et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in an immature rat model of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 30 (24), 2066-2072 (2013).
  37. Adelson, P. D., Fellows-Mayle, W., Kochanek, P. M., Dixon, C. E. Morris water maze function and histologic characterization of two age-at-injury experimental models of controlled cortical impact in the immature rat. Child's Nervous System. 29 (1), 43-53 (2013).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website.

By continuing to use our website or clicking “Continue”, you are agreeing to accept our cookies.

Learn More