Accedi

Using Your Head: Measuring Infants' Rational Imitation of Actions

Panoramica

Source: Laboratories of Judith Danovitch and Nicholaus Noles—University of Louisville

One of the main challenges of infancy is to learn how to achieve one’s goals in the world, whether they are to pick up a toy or to express desires to another person, and one of the most powerful tools in this learning process is imitation. However, imitation is not always as simple as copying other people’s actions; it is also necessary to realize that goals and intentions guide behavior. The world is a complicated place, and the actions that babies imitate are not perfectly presented. For example, consider a baby watching their father drinking from a plastic water bottle. As he picks up the bottle, he accidentally drops it on the floor. He picks it up and dusts it off, before turning the cap and taking a drink. If the baby wants to drink from the bottle on their own, they have to decode this complex set of events and determine which actions are related to their goal. Do they have to drop it and dust it off, or can they simply turn the cap and take a drink?

One way to solve this problem is to view many examples of the same behavior, but some behaviors are rare or different each time they are performed. Thus, it is beneficial for infants to think more about the person they are imitating and less about the specific situation they are observing. If infants assume that others are rational and have goals they are efficiently pursuing, then they can observe a complex event and separate the goal-oriented actions from actions that are incidental or unrelated to their goals. Analyzing the reasons underlying a person’s behavior allows infants to decide whether it makes sense to imitate that person’s exact actions or to do things in a simpler or more effective way.

This experiment demonstrates how to measure infant’s rational imitation of an actor using the methods developed by Meltzoff1 and Gergely, Bekkering, and Kiraly.2

Procedura

Recruit a number of 14-month-old infants. Participants should have no history of developmental disorders and have normal hearing and vision.

Because infants of this age can be uncooperative or fussy (e.g., refuse to watch a demonstration) and this experiment requires two sessions, expect to recruit and test extra participants in order to obtain sufficient data.

1. Data collection

  1. Session one
    1. Place a touch-sensitive lamp (at least 6 in

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Risultati

Researchers tested 27 infants and found that 69% of the infants in the hands-free condition re-enacted the head action during session two. In contrast, only 21% of the infants in the hands-occupied condition did so (Figure 1). This supports the claim that 14-month-olds are able to evaluate the reasons for an adult’s behavior. When they viewed the experimenter touching the lamp with their head while their hands were occupied, they inferred that they would have used their hands if they were free, and

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Riferimenti

  1. Meltzoff, A. N. Infant imitation after a 1-week delay: Long-term memory for novel acts and multiple stimuli. Developmental Psychology. 24 (4), 470 (1988).
  2. Gergely, G., Bekkering, H., & Király, I. Rational imitation in preverbal infants. Nature. 415 (6873), 755-755 (2002).

Tags

ImitationInfantsRational ImitationSocial LearningGoals And IntentionsDecoding EventsGoal oriented ActionsIncidental ActionsImitation ExperimentAndrew MeltzoffGy rgy GergelyRational ScenarioHands occupied ConditionHands free Condition

Vai a...

0:00

Overview

1:14

Experimental Design

2:47

Running the Experiment

6:07

Representative Results

6:43

Applications

7:46

Summary

Video da questa raccolta:

article

Now Playing

Using Your Head: Measuring Infants' Rational Imitation of Actions

Developmental Psychology

10.2K Visualizzazioni

article

Habituation: Studying Infants Before They Can Talk

Developmental Psychology

54.1K Visualizzazioni

article

The Rouge Test: Searching for a Sense of Self

Developmental Psychology

54.3K Visualizzazioni

article

Numerical Cognition: More or Less

Developmental Psychology

15.0K Visualizzazioni

article

Mutual Exclusivity: How Children Learn the Meanings of Words

Developmental Psychology

32.9K Visualizzazioni

article

How Children Solve Problems Using Causal Reasoning

Developmental Psychology

13.1K Visualizzazioni

article

Metacognitive Development: How Children Estimate Their Memory

Developmental Psychology

10.4K Visualizzazioni

article

Executive Function and the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task

Developmental Psychology

15.0K Visualizzazioni

article

Categories and Inductive Inferences

Developmental Psychology

5.3K Visualizzazioni

article

The Costs and Benefits of Natural Pedagogy

Developmental Psychology

5.2K Visualizzazioni

article

Piaget's Conservation Task and the Influence of Task Demands

Developmental Psychology

61.2K Visualizzazioni

article

Children's Reliance on Artist Intentions When Identifying Pictures

Developmental Psychology

5.6K Visualizzazioni

article

Measuring Children's Trust in Testimony

Developmental Psychology

6.3K Visualizzazioni

article

Are You Smart or Hardworking? How Praise Influences Children's Motivation

Developmental Psychology

14.3K Visualizzazioni

article

Memory Development: Demonstrating How Repeated Questioning Leads to False Memories

Developmental Psychology

10.9K Visualizzazioni

JoVE Logo

Riservatezza

Condizioni di utilizzo

Politiche

Ricerca

Didattica

CHI SIAMO

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. Tutti i diritti riservati