1. Inducing a Phosphene with Stimulation to the Right Occipital Lobe
<ol class="lalpha">
 <li>In a dimly lit room, seat the participant in a comfortable position. Have the participant put on a swim cap, provide them with hearing protection, and adjust the cap and ear plugs for comfort. To locate and mark the initial point of stimulation, first identify the inion, and then move ~2cm rostrally and ~2cm laterally (figure 1). Alternatively, a frameless stereotaxic system can be used to position the TMS coil over the targeted cortical region.</li>
 <li>Using a standard figure-eight (double) TMS coil (70mm), place the center of the coil directly over the location determined in the previous step. The coil should be held tangential to the surface of the scalp and oriented in a medial to lateral orientation with the handle facing away from the midline (figure 2).</li>
 <li>When the participant is ready, apply a single pulse at 60% intensity output. Ask the participant to describe any visual sensation they may have perceived. Participants who are na&iacute;ve to phosphenes may benefit from wearing a blindfold. If no phosphene was reported, reposition the coil and redeliver a pulse. If the participant still does not report a phosphene, continue delivering pulses every 7 to 10 seconds (~ 0.1 Hz), increasing the intensity by 5% after every five attempts until 100% intensity is reached.</li>
 <li>When the participant reports a phosphene ask him or her to describe in detail what they perceived including color, shape and location. Note: Phosphenes should appear in the contralateral visual field to the hemisphere that is being stimulated. For example if TMS is applied over the right visual cortex, phosphenes should be perceived in the left visual field. </li>
 <li>When phosphenes are reliably reported, mark the location of the coil on the swim cap.</li>
</ol>
2. Obtaining a Phosphene Threshold Value for the Right Occipital Lobe
<ol class="lalpha">
	<li>Deliver a series of pulses at the same coil location and orientation as above. Ask the participant to confirm the presence of the induced phosphene. </li>
	<li>Deliver pulses every 7 to 10 seconds (~ 0.1 Hz). Instruct the participant to report, after each pulse, whether a phosphene was perceived using the following criteria: with a "yes" an unambiguously perceived phosphene; "no" the absence of any visual perception; "maybe" if they are not sure. A "maybe" response should not be counted as a positive response when determining the threshold value. </li>
	<li>Adjust the stimulation intensity, delivering 10 pulses at each intensity level, until a phosphene threshold is determined. The threshold is defined as the lowest intensity of stimulation at which the participant reports unambiguous phosphenes for at least fifty-percent of delivered pulses.</li>
</ol>
3. Using the LTaP System (Figure 3) to Determining the Size and Location of Phosphenes at Various Fixation points
<ol class="lalpha">
 <li>Seat the participant so that the nasion (area between the eyes) is approximately 30cm from the center of the projection screen.</li>
 <li>To acclimate the participant to the LTaP system, give them the laser pointer and instruct them to practice tracing figures that resemble perceived phosphenes. If the participant needs more practice, you may ask the participant to direct the laser point to indicated locations on the projection screen. When the participant is acquainted with the LTaP system and can accurately draw shapes on the screen, deliver a series of TMS pulses to the location marked in the previous steps sufficient to induce a visible phosphene. Ask the participant to trace or outline the perceived phosphene on the projection screen using the laser pointer.</li>
 <li>In the three test conditions the stimulus intensity should be 120% of the determined threshold value. For example, if the determined threshold value is 65%, the stimulus intensity value should be set to 78%. The coil location and orientation are the same as determined and described in the above steps.</li>
 <li>In the first of the three test conditions, have the participant direct their gaze towards a central fixation point. After delivering a pulse instruct the participant to trace or outline the perceived phosphene using the laser pointer. Deliver a series of pulses sufficient to induce ten phosphenes.</li>
 <li>In the second test condition, have the participant direct their gaze towards a fixation point that is elevated 45&deg; from the central fixation point. Repeat the protocol as described for the first condition.</li>
 <li>In the third test condition, have the participant direct their gaze towards a fixation point that is positioned 45&deg; to the right of the central fixation point. Repeat the protocol as described for the first condition.</li>
 </ol>
4. Data Analysis
<ol class="lalpha">
 <li>After the completion of the study data obtained from the LTaP system can be analyzed. The output of the LTAP system consists of an .xml file including color coded X-Y coordinates with timestamps for each record tracing. Analyze the data in order to detect the shift in phosphene position in reference to shift of gaze. </li>
 </ol>
5. Representative Results
When the TMS coil is placed over the right hemisphere all phosphenes should be observed in the left visual field. When participants are instructed to look straight ahead, phosphenes are typically located in the lower left visual field. Phosphenes should move in accordance with the shift in visual gaze (either 45&deg; vertically or horizontally from central fixation) (figure 4).
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/1762/1762fig1.jpg" alt="figure 1" /> Figure 1. Locating and marking the initial stimulation site. For occipital visual areas, the initial stimulation site (a) is typically located ~ 2 cm dorsally and ~ 2 cm laterally from the inion (b).
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/1762/1762fig2.jpg" alt="figure 2" /> Figure 2. Position the coil for stimulation. The center of the coil is held tangential to the scalp at the site of stimulation. To minimize an unintended spread of stimulation, orient the handle of the coil away from the midline.
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/1762/1762fig3.jpg" alt="figure 3" /> Figure 3. The LTaP (Laser Tracking and Painting) system. A participant (a) sits in front of a rear projection screen (b). After stimulation by the TMS coil (c), the participant uses a laser pointer (d) to draw the perceived phosphenes on the screen (d). A rear-facing webcam (e) records the laser and feeds it to a computer (f) running the LTaP software. The data is then projected back onto the screen via a rear-facing projector (g).
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/1762/1762fig4.jpg" alt="figure 4" /> Figure 4. Post-processing of the LTaP data. The location and size of the perceived phosphenes (white shapes) are shown relative to the location of fixation, indicated by the crosshairs.

<ol>
	<li>Kammer, T., Puls, K., Strasburger, H., Hill, N. J., Wichmann, F. A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Transcranial+Magnetic+Stimulation+in+the+Visual+System.+I.+the+Psychophysics+of+Visual+Suppression.">Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Visual System. I. the Psychophysics of Visual Suppression.</a> Experimental Brain Research. 160, 118-128 (2005).</li><li>Afra, J., Mascia, A., G&#233;rard, P., Maertens de Noordhout, A., Schoenen, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Interictal+cortical+excitability+in+migraine:+a+study+using+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation+of+motor+and+visual+cortices.">Interictal cortical excitability in migraine: a study using transcranial magnetic stimulation of motor and visual cortices.</a> Ann. Neurol. 44, 209-215 (1998).</li><li>Aurora, S. K., Ahmad, B. K., Welch, K. M., Bhardhwaj, P., Ramadan, N. M. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Transcranial+magnetic+stimulation+confirms+hyperexcitability+of+occipital+cortex+in+migraine.">Transcranial magnetic stimulation confirms hyperexcitability of occipital cortex in migraine.</a> Neurology. 50, 1111-1114 (1998).</li><li>Silvanto, J., Pascual-Leone, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=.">.</a> State-Dependency of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain Topography. 21, 1-10 (2008).</li><li>Silvanto, J., Muggleton, N., Cowey, A., Walsh, V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Neural+adaptation+reveals+state-dependent+effects+of+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation.">Neural adaptation reveals state-dependent effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation.</a> European Journal of Neuroscience. 25, (2007).</li><li>Kammer, T., Beck, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Phosphene+thresholds+evoked+by+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation+are+insensitive+to+short-lasting+variations+in+ambient+light.">Phosphene thresholds evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation are insensitive to short-lasting variations in ambient light.</a> Exp Brain Res. 145, 407-4010 (2002).</li><li>Bjoertomt, O., Cowey, A., Walsh, V. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Spatial+neglect+in+near+and+far+space+investigated+by+repetitive+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation.">Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.</a> Brain. 125, 2012-2022 (2002).</li><li>Gothe, J. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Changes+in+visual+cortex+excitability+in+blind+subjects+as+demonstrated+by+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation.">Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.</a> Brain. 125, 479-490 (2002).</li><li>Hotson, J. R., Anand, S. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+selectivity+and+timing+of+motion+processing+in+human+temporo-parieto-occipital+and+occipital+cortex:+a+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation+study.">The selectivity and timing of motion processing in human temporo-parieto-occipital and occipital cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.</a> Neuropsychologia. 37, 169-179 (1999).</li><li>Kammer, T. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=Phosphenes+and+transient+scotomas+induced+by+magnetic+stimulation+of+the+occipital+lobe:+their+topographic+relationship.">Phosphenes and transient scotomas induced by magnetic stimulation of the occipital lobe: their topographic relationship.</a> Neuropsychologia. 37, 191-198 (1998).</li><li>Stewart, L., Ellison, A., Walsh, V., Cowey, A. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Search&doptcmdl=Citation&defaultField=Title+Word&term=The+role+of+transcranial+magnetic+stimulation+(TMS)+in+studies+of+vision,+attention+and+cognition.">The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in studies of vision, attention and cognition.</a> Acta Psychol (Amst). , 107-275 (2001).</li></ol>

In this video, we have demonstrated a standard protocol for obtaining a phosphene threshold value and introduced a novel method for recording phosphene size and visual field location. Phosphenes were elicited by delivering individual pulses of TMS to the right occipital cortex adjacent to the occipital pole. Phosphene threshold values provide a valuable indication of relative cortical excitability; and have been used both as an outcome measure and as a means of determining the appropriate intensity of TMS in variety of s...

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en">	
		
		<div>
		<table border="1">
		<thead>
		<tr>
		<th>Material Name</th>
		<th>Type</th>
		<th>Company</th>
		<th>Catalogue Number</th>
		<th>Comment</th>
		</tr>
		</thead>
		<tbody>
		
<tr>
<td>TMS</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Magstim</td>
<td>Magstim 200</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<tr>
<td>Webcam</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Logitech</td>
<td>QuickCam Orbit MP</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<tr>
<td>Projector</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Epson</td>
<td>Epson PowerLite 7900p</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<tr>
<td>Projection Screen</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>DA LITE</td>
<td>Da-View fast-fold deluxe screen</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<tr>
<td>Laser Pointer</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>Generic</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>
<td>&nbsp;</td>		</tbody>
		</table>
		</div>

a novel approach for documenting phosphenes induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

Stimulation of the human visual cortex produces a transient perception of light, known as a phosphene. Phosphenes are induced by invasive electrical stimulation of the occipital cortex, but also by non-invasive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)1 of the same cortical regions. The intensity at which a phosphene is induced (phosphene threshold) is a well established measure of visual cortical excitability and is used to study cortico-cortical interactions, functional organization 2, susceptibility to pathology 3,4 and visual processing 5-7. Phosphenes are typically defined by three characteristics: they are observed in the visual hemifield contralateral to stimulation; they are induced when the subject s eyes are open or closed, and their spatial location changes with the direction of gaze 2. Various methods have been used to document phosphenes, but a standardized methodology is lacking. We demonstrate a reliable procedure to obtain phosphene threshold values and introduce a novel system for the documentation and analysis of phosphenes. We developed the Laser Tracking and Painting system (LTaP), a low cost, easily built and operated system that records the location and size of perceived phosphenes in real-time. The LTaP system provides a stable and customizable environment for quantification and analysis of phosphenes.

Watch this Scientific Journal Video about A Novel Approach for Documenting Phosphenes Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at JoVE.com

A Novel Approach for Documenting Phosphenes Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Phosphenes are transient percepts of light that can be induced by applying Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to visually sensitive regions of cortex. We demonstrate a standard protocol for determining the phosphene threshold value and introduce a novel method for quantifying and analyzing perceived phosphenes.

Stimulation of the human visual cortex produces a transient perception of light, known as a phosphene. Phosphenes are induced by invasive electrical ...

a-novel-approach-for-documenting-phosphenes-induced-transcranial

Research

JoVE Journal

Neuroscience

12.0K Görüntüleme.  Boston University School of Medicine. Phosphenes görsel korteksin hassas bölgeler Transkraniyal Manyetik Stimülasyon (TMS) uygulayarak uyarılabilir geçici ışık gözlemleri bilgi. Biz phosphene eşik değerinin belirlenmesi için standart bir protokoldür göstermek ve algılanan phosphenes ölçülmekte ve analiz etmek için yeni bir yöntem tanıtmak.

Video: A Novel Approach for Documenting Phosphenes Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Combining Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and fMRI to Examine the Default Mode Network

The default mode network is a group of brain regions that are active when an individual is not focused on the outside world and the brain is at "wakeful rest."1,2,3 It is thought the default mode network corresponds to self-referential or "internal mentation".2,3
It has been hypothesized that, in humans, activity within the default mode network is correlated with certain pathologies (for instance, hyper-activation has been linked to schizophrenia 4,5,6 and autism spectrum disorders 7 whilst hypo-activation of the network has been linked to Alzheimer's and other neurodegenerative diseases 8). As such, noninvasive modulation of this network may represent a potential therapeutic intervention for a number of neurological and psychiatric pathologies linked to abnormal network activation. One possible tool to effect this modulation is Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: a non-invasive neurostimulatory and neuromodulatory technique that can transiently or lastingly modulate cortical excitability (either increasing or decreasing it) via the application of localized magnetic field pulses.9
In order to explore the default mode network's propensity towards and tolerance of modulation, we will be combining TMS (to the left inferior parietal lobe) with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Through this article, we will examine the protocol and considerations necessary to successfully combine these two neuroscientific tools.

In this article, we examine the methodology and considerations relevant to the combination of TMS and fMRI to examine the effects of brain stimulation on the default network.

The default mode network is a group of brain regions that are active when an individual is not focused on the outside world and the brain is at "wakeful ...

State-Dependency Effects on TMS:  A Look at Motive Phosphene Behavior

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neurostimulatory and neuromodulatory technique that can transiently or lastingly modulate cortical excitability (either increasing or decreasing it) via the application of localized magnetic field pulses.1,2 Within the field of TMS, the term state dependency refers to the initial, baseline condition of the particular neural region targeted for stimulation. As can be inferred, the effects of TMS can (and do) vary according to this primary susceptibility and responsiveness of the targeted cortical area.3,4,5

In this experiment, we will examine this concept of state dependency through the elicitation and subjective experience of motive phosphenes. Phosphenes are visually perceived flashes of small lights triggered by electromagnetic pulses to the visual cortex. These small lights can assume varied characteristics depending upon which type of visual cortex is being stimulated. In this particular study, we will be targeting motive phosphenes as elicited through the stimulation of V1/V2 and the V5/MT+ complex visual regions.6

In this article, we examine the effects of visually relevant state dependency on TMS induced motive phosphenic presentations.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive neurostimulatory and neuromodulatory technique that can transiently or lastingly modulate ...

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique that has been increasingly used over the past decade in the treatment of neurological and psychiatric disorders such as stroke and depression. Yet, the mechanisms underlying its ability to modulate brain excitability to improve clinical symptoms remains poorly understood 33. To help improve this understanding, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) can be used as it allows the in vivo quantification of brain metabolites such as &#947;-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate in a region-specific manner 41. In fact, a recent study demonstrated that 1H-MRS is indeed a powerful means to better understand the effects of tDCS on neurotransmitter concentration 34. This article aims to describe the complete protocol for combining tDCS (NeuroConn MR compatible stimulator) with 1H-MRS at 3 T using a MEGA-PRESS sequence. We will describe the impact of a protocol that has shown great promise for the treatment of motor dysfunctions after stroke, which consists of bilateral stimulation of primary motor cortices 27,30,31. Methodological factors to consider and possible modifications to the protocol are also discussed.

This article aims to describe a basic protocol for combining transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) measurements to investigate the effects of bilateral stimulation on primary motor cortex metabolism.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a neuromodulation technique that has been increasingly used over the past decade in the treatment of ...

Effects of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Primary Motor Cortex by Online Combined Approach with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) is a neuromodulatory technique able to act through sinusoidal electrical waveforms in a specific frequency and in turn modulate ongoing cortical oscillatory activity. This neurotool allows the establishment of a causal link between endogenous oscillatory activity and behavior. Most of the tACS studies have shown online effects of tACS. However, little is known about the underlying action mechanisms of this technique because of the AC-induced artifacts on Electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Here we show a unique approach to investigate online physiological frequency-specific effects of tACS of the primary motor cortex (M1) by using single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) to probe cortical excitability changes. In our setup, the TMS coil is placed over the tACS electrode while Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) are collected to test the effects of the ongoing M1-tACS. So far, this approach has mainly been used to study the visual and motor systems. However, the current tACS-TMS setup can pave the way for future investigations of cognitive functions. Therefore, we provide a step-by-step manual and video guidelines for the procedure.

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) allows the modulation of cortical excitability in a frequency-specific fashion. Here we show a unique approach which combines online tACS with single pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) in order to "probe" cortical excitability by means of Motor Evoked Potentials.

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) is a neuromodulatory technique able to act through sinusoidal electrical waveforms in a specific ...

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition

We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) characterization of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and inhibition. Motor response inhibition prevents unwanted actions and is abnormal in several neuropsychiatric conditions. TMS is a non-invasive technology that can quantify M1 excitability and inhibition using single- and paired-pulse protocols and can be precisely timed to study cortical physiology with high temporal resolution. We modified the original Slater-Hammel (S-H) stop signal task to create a &#34;racecar&#34; version with TMS pulses time-locked to intra-trial events. This task is self-paced, with each trial initiating after a button push to move the racecar towards the 800 ms target. GO trials require a finger-lift to stop the racecar just before this target. Interspersed randomly are STOP trials (25%) during which the dynamically adjusted stop signal prompts subjects to prevent finger-lift. For GO trials, TMS pulses were delivered at 650 ms after trial onset; whereas, for STOP trials, the TMS pulses occurred 150 ms after the stop signal. The timings of the TMS pulses were decided based on electroencephalography (EEG) studies showing event-related changes in these time ranges during stop signal tasks. This task was studied in 3 blocks at two study sites (n=38) and we recorded behavioral performance and event-related motor-evoked potentials (MEP). Regression modelling was used to analyze MEP amplitudes using age as a covariate with multiple independent variables (sex, study site, block, TMS pulse condition [single- vs. paired-pulse], trial condition [GO, successful STOP, failed STOP]). The analysis showed that TMS pulse condition (p&#60;0.0001) and its interaction with trial condition (p=0.009) were significant. Future applications for this online S-H/TMS paradigm include the addition of simultaneous EEG acquisition to measure TMS-evoked EEG potentials. A potential limitation is that in children, the TMS pulse sound could&#160;affect behavioral task performance.

We describe an experimental procedure to quantify excitability and inhibition of primary motor cortex during a motor response inhibition task by using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation throughout the course of a Stop Signal Task.

We describe the development of a reproducible, child-friendly motor response inhibition task suitable for online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) ...

Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method that produces neural excitation in the cortex by means of brief, time-varying magnetic field pulses. The initiation of cortical activation or its modulation depends on the background activation of the neurons of the cortical region activated, the characteristics of the coil, its position and its orientation with respect to the head. TMS combined with simultaneous electrocephalography (EEG) and neuronavigation (nTMS-EEG) allows for the assessment of cortico-cortical excitability and connectivity in almost all cortical areas in a reproducible manner. This advance makes nTMS-EEG a powerful tool that can accurately assess brain dynamics and neurophysiology in test-retest paradigms that are required for clinical trials. Limitations of this method include artifacts that cover the initial brain reactivity to stimulation. Thus, the process of removing artifacts may also extract valuable information. Moreover, the optimal parameters for dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC) stimulation are not fully known and current protocols utilize variations from the motor cortex (M1) stimulation paradigms. However, evolving nTMS-EEG designs hope to address these issues. The protocol presented here introduces some standard practices for assessing neurophysiological functioning from stimulation to the DLPFC that can be applied in patients with treatment resistant psychiatric disorders that receive treatment such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), magnetic seizure therapy (MST) or electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

The protocol presented here is for TMS-EEG studies utilizing intracortical excitability test-retest design paradigms. The intent of the protocol is to produce reliable and reproducible cortical excitability measures for assessing neurophysiological functioning related to therapeutic interventions in the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases such as major depression.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive method that produces neural excitation in the cortex by means of brief, time-varying magnetic ...

Bilateral Assessment of the Corticospinal Pathways of the Ankle Muscles Using Navigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Distal leg muscles receive neural input from motor cortical areas via the corticospinal tract, which is one of the main motor descending pathway in humans and can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Given the role of distal leg muscles in upright postural and dynamic tasks, such as walking, a growing research interest in the assessment and modulation of the corticospinal tracts relative to the function of these muscles has emerged in the last decade. However, methodological parameters used in previous work have varied across studies making the interpretation of results from cross-sectional and longitudinal studies less robust. Therefore, use of a standardized TMS protocol specific to the assessment of leg muscles&#39; corticomotor response (CMR) will allow for direct comparison of results across studies and cohorts. The objective of this paper is to present a protocol that provides the flexibility to simultaneously assess the bilateral CMR of two main ankle antagonistic muscles, the tibialis anterior and soleus, using single pulse TMS with a neuronavigation system. The present protocol is applicable while the examined muscle is either fully relaxed or isometrically contracted at a defined percentage of maximum isometric voluntary contraction. Using each subject&#39;s structural MRI with the neuronavigation system ensures accurate and precise positioning of the coil over the leg cortical representations during assessment. Given the inconsistency in CMR derived measures, this protocol also describes a standardized calculation of these measures using automated algorithms. Though this protocol is not conducted during upright postural or dynamic tasks, it&#160;can be used to assess bilaterally any pair of leg muscles, either antagonistic or synergistic, in both neurologically intact and impaired subjects.

The present protocol describes the simultaneous, bilateral assessment of the corticomotor response of the tibialis anterior and soleus during rest and tonic voluntary activation using a single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuronavigation system.

Distal leg muscles receive neural input from motor cortical areas via the corticospinal tract, which is one of the main motor descending pathway in humans ...

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships

Neuroimaging is typically perceived as a resource demanding discipline. While this is the case in certain circumstances, institutions with limited resources have historically contributed significantly to the field of neuroscience, including neuroimaging. In the study of self-deception, we have successfully employed single-pulse TMS to determine the brain correlates of abilities including overclaiming and self-enhancement. Even without the use of neuro-navigation, methods provided here lead to successful outcomes. For example, it was discovered that decreases in self-deceptive responding lead to a decrease in affect. These methods provide data that are reliable and valid, and such methods provide research opportunities otherwise unavailable.&#160;Through the use of these methods, the overall knowledge base in the field of neuroscience is expanded, providing research opportunities to students such as those at our institution&#160;(Montclair State University is a Hispanic-Serving Institute) who are often denied such research experiences.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and low-frequency TMS (lfTMS) have&#160;been demonstrated to be major contributors to brain literature. Here we highlight the methods for investigating the cortical correlates of self-deception using TMS.

Neuroimaging is typically perceived as a resource demanding discipline. While this is the case in certain circumstances, institutions with limited ...

Conventional and Threshold-Tracking Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tests for Single-handed Operation

Most single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) parameters (e.g., motor threshold, stimulus-response function, cortical silent period) are used to examine corticospinal excitability. Paired-pulse TMS paradigms (e.g., short- and long-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI/LICI), short-interval intracortical facilitation (SICF), and short- and long-latency afferent inhibition (SAI/LAI)) provide information about intracortical inhibitory and facilitatory networks. This has long been done by the conventional TMS method of measuring changes in the size of the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in response to stimuli of constant intensity. An alternative threshold-tracking approach has recently been introduced whereby the stimulus intensity for a target amplitude is tracked. The diagnostic utility of threshold-tracking SICI in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has been shown in previous studies. However, threshold-tracking TMS has only been used in a few centers, in part due to the lack of readily available software but also perhaps due to uncertainty over its relationship to conventional single- and paired-pulse TMS measurements.
A menu-driven suite of semi-automatic programs has been developed to facilitate the broader use of threshold-tracking TMS techniques and to enable direct comparisons with conventional amplitude measurements. These have been designed to control three types of magnetic stimulators and allow recording by a single operator of the common single- and paired-pulse TMS protocols.
This paper shows how to record a number of single- and paired-pulse TMS protocols on healthy subjects and analyze the recordings. These TMS protocols are fast and easy to perform and can provide useful biomarkers in different neurological disorders, particularly neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS.

We present a suite of standardized single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) recording protocols, with options for conventional amplitude measurements and threshold-tracking. This program can control three different types of magnetic stimulators and is designed to enable all tests to be performed conveniently by a single operator.

Most single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) parameters (e.g., motor threshold, stimulus-response function, cortical silent period) are used ...

Measuring Contralateral Silent Period Induced by Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Investigate M1 Corticospinal Inhibition

Contralateral silent period (cSP) is a period of suppression in the background electrical muscle activity captured by electromyography (EMG) after a motor evoked potential (MEP). To obtain this, an MEP is elicited by a suprathreshold transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse delivered to the primary motor cortex (M1) of the target muscle selected, while the participant provides a standardized voluntary target muscle contraction. The cSP is a result of inhibitory mechanisms that occur after the MEP; it provides a broad temporal assessment of spinal inhibition in its initial ~50 ms, and cortical inhibition after. Researchers have tried to better understand the neurobiological mechanism behind the cSP to validate it as a potential diagnostic, surrogate, and predictive biomarker for different neuropsychiatric diseases. Therefore, this article describes a method to measure M1 cSP of lower and upper limbs, including a selection of target muscle, electrode placement, coil positioning, method of measuring voluntary contraction stimulation, intensity setup, and data analysis to obtain a representative result. It has the educational objective of giving a visual guideline in performing a feasible, reliable, and reproducible cSP protocol for lower and upper limbs and discussing practical challenges of this technique.

Contralateral silent period (cSP) assessment is a promising biomarker to index cortical excitability and treatment response. We demonstrate a protocol to assess cSP intended for studying M1 corticospinal inhibition of upper and lower limbs.

Contralateral silent period (cSP) is a period of suppression in the background electrical muscle activity captured by electromyography (EMG) after a motor ...