Sign In

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

In This Article

  • Summary
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Protocol
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Disclosures
  • Acknowledgements
  • Materials
  • References
  • Reprints and Permissions

Summary

This article presents a detailed experimental procedure for reconstituting nucleosome-containing DNA tethers for single-molecule correlative force and fluorescence microscopy. It further describes several downstream experiments that can be conducted to visualize the binding behavior of chromatin-interacting proteins and analyze changes in the physical properties of nucleosomes.

Abstract

Nucleosomes constitute the primary unit of eukaryotic chromatin and have been the focus of numerous informative single-molecule investigations regarding their biophysical properties and interactions with chromatin-binding proteins. Nucleosome reconstitution on DNA for these studies typically involves a salt dialysis procedure that provides precise control over the placement and number of nucleosomes formed along a DNA tether. However, this protocol is time-consuming and requires a substantial amount of DNA and histone octamers as inputs. To offer an alternative strategy, an in situ nucleosome reconstitution method for single-molecule force and fluorescence microscopy that utilizes the histone chaperone Nap1 is described. This method enables users to assemble nucleosomes on any DNA template without the need for strong nucleosome positioning sequences, adjust nucleosome density on demand, and use fewer reagents. In situ nucleosome formation occurs within seconds, offering a simpler experimental workflow and a convenient transition into single-molecule measurements. Examples of two downstream assays for probing nucleosome mechanics and visualizing the behavior of individual proteins on chromatin are further described.

Introduction

The primary packaging unit of eukaryotic chromatin is the nucleosome, in which ~147 base pairs (bps) of DNA are wrapped around an octamer of core histones proteins1,2. In addition to genome packaging, the nucleosome architecture serves as another rich layer of biophysical regulation that can be harnessed by chromatin-binding proteins when performing their various functions3,4. Experimentally accessing and measuring the physical characteristics of nucleosomes has been technically challenging since these units perform at minuscule scales (e.g., nanometer lengths, piconewton forces), and thus, their probing requires sufficient sensitivity and precision to meaningfully inform function. Moreover, chromatin-binding proteins often engage with their substrates transiently, and most ensemble approaches lack appropriate temporal resolution to inform the kinetics of these interactions5. Fortunately, the advent of single-molecule techniques has made it possible to visualize and manipulate individual proteins and their interactions in real-time, revealing mechanistic information about these molecular events occurring at the nanoscale6. In particular, single-molecule correlative force and fluorescence microscopy (smCFFM) harnesses both high-resolution fluorescence detection and force manipulation tools to simultaneously resolve the mechanics, composition, and coordination of chromatin and chromatin-protein complexes7,8.

In smCFFM that specifically employs "optical tweezers" as the force manipulation method, a tightly focused laser is used to trap a dielectric object, typically a micron-sized plastic bead, in three dimensions9. A biopolymer such as a piece of DNA can be conjugated to the bead (via, e.g., streptavidin-biotin, digoxigenin-anti-digoxigenin antibody linkage), and the user can both apply a calibrated force and measure the force/displacement generated by the system10. The added fluorescence module enables simultaneous multicolor fluorescence imaging to track protein composition and behavior.

The mainstream method for reconstituting nucleosome templates for smCFFM involves assembling nucleosomes on custom DNA templates by salt dialysis11,12,13. In this procedure, purified histone octamers are incubated with DNA templates in a high-salt buffer (~1 M sodium chloride), and as the salt is slowly dialyzed away, nucleosomes spontaneously assemble on the DNA in a sequence-dependent positional manner14,15. As such, it is customary that strong nucleosome positioning sequences (e.g., Widom 60116, X. laevis 5S rDNA17) are incorporated within the DNA templates to generate custom nucleosome arrays. Although this well-established method offers precise control over the placement and number of nucleosomes across DNA, it suffers from several disadvantages: (1) incorporation of strong nucleosome positioning DNA sequences may generate artificially stable nucleosomes that bias the activity of chromatin-binding proteins, (2) the process of salt dialysis for nucleosome formation requires high amounts of DNA and octamers, and (3) the procedure takes one to several days of work as well as a considerable effort to titrate the correct DNA to octamer ratio for optimal nucleosome array density.

In this manuscript, we describe an alternative method to form nucleosomes along DNA in situ within a single-molecule correlative force and fluorescence microscope using recombinant histone chaperone Nap1, which resembles the physiological pathway of nucleosome formation in vivo18,19,20,21,22. This method allows users to assemble nucleosomes on non-specific DNA sequences, easily adjust nucleosome density, and utilize significantly fewer amounts of reagents, all within minutes. Additionally, the formation of nucleosomal DNA tethers in situ enables simpler experimental workflow and the convenience of built-in single-molecule visualization and manipulation. Thus, when uniform and specific nucleosome positioning is not a necessity, this protocol offers a useful option for the investigation of nucleosome mechanics or protein behavior on chromatin, for which we also describe example assays.

Protocol

The details of the reagents and the equipment used in the study are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. Preparation of biotinylated DNA

  1. Prepare a 120 µL volume reaction containing 20 µg of λ DNA, 33 µM of biotin-dCTP, 33 µM of biotin-dUTP, 33 µM of biotin-dATP, 33 µM of dGTP, 10 units of Klenow enzyme, and 1x NEB Buffer 2.
    NOTE: This procedure specifically utilizes linear double-stranded (ds) methylation-free bacteriophage λ genomic DNA (48,502 bps), which contains 12-nucleotide (nt) 5' single-stranded (ss) DNA overhang23. However, the protocol can be adapted to make use of any length or sequence of linear dsDNA provided it contains at least several nts of ss 5' overhangs, the length and nt sequence dictating the number of biotinylated nts installed on each end for downstream tethering between optical traps. Additionally, the reaction can be scaled down. For example, 5 µg of DNA can be used in a 30 µL volume reaction. Additionally, the DNA substrates generated in this way are not torsionally constrained. For protocols to create torsionally constrained DNA, please refer to the previously published reports24,25.
  2. Incubate the reaction at room temperature for 15 min.
  3. Add 10 mM of EDTA and incubate at 75 °C for 20 min.
  4. Perform ethanol precipitation to obtain the biotinylated DNA product.
    1. Add 0.1x volume of 3 M sodium acetate and 3x volume of ice cold 100% ethanol. Keep at -20 °C for at least 1 h up to overnight. Centrifuge at 13,500 x g for 30 min at 4 °C.
    2. Carefully remove the supernatant without disturbing the pellet and add 1 mL of 75% ethanol. Centrifuge at 13,500 x g for 1 min at 4 °C.
    3. Repeat the supernatant removal, ethanol addition, and centrifugation steps.
    4. Carefully remove all the supernatant and let the pellet air dry for 10 min. Dissolve the pellet in 100-200 µL of TE buffer or ddH2O (can incubate at 37 °C to facilitate dissolving). Measure the concentration using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer.

2. Preparation of channels in a flow cell

NOTE: This procedure is based on a commercially available microfluidic chip (see Table of Materials) but can be adapted to any smCFFM instrument with a multi-channel flow cell.

  1. Passivate channels (ch.) 4 and 5 (or any ch. that will contain proteins) (see schematic of channels in Figure 1A). Add 500 µL of 0.1% BSA to each channel and flow at 0.8 bar (~0.45 µL/s for tubing with a 0.010 inch inner diameter) for 8 min. Remove solution.
  2. Add 500 µL of 0.05% Pluronic-F127 to each channel and flow at 0.8 bar for 8 min. Remove the solution and rinse out the syringes with 1x PBS. Add 2 mL of 1x PBS to each channel and flow at 0.8 barfor 27 min.
  3. Vortex the stock solution of streptavidin-coated beads (this procedure uses 3.13 µm size beads) and add 2.15 µL of the bead solution to 1 mL of 1x PBS. Add to ch. 1.
    NOTE: The size and concentration of the streptavidin-coated beads can be adjusted according to user preference.
  4. Add 30-80 ng of biotinylated λ DNA to 1 mL of 1x PBS. Add to ch. 2.
    NOTE: The concentration of biotinylated DNA can be adjusted to user preference. Greater amounts of DNA will increase the frequency of forming DNA tethers but also raise the frequency of tethering multiple molecules of DNA at once, which can add to the difficulty of the experiment.

3. Nap1-mediated in situ nucleosome formation

  1. Add 500 µL of protein-free image buffer to ch. 3.
    NOTE: The buffer composition in ch. 3 is flexible and should be appropriate for both nucleosomes and the specific protein(s) of interest. Optionally, users may choose to add oxygen scavenging systems for reduced photobleaching of fluorophores and/or competitor DNA to remove histone octamers that are not properly wrapped into nucleosomes.
  2. Add 2 nM S. cerevisiae Nap1 and 2-5 nM LD655-labeled H4 histone octamer (HO) to 500 µL of 1x HR buffer18. Add to ch. 4.
    NOTE: Histone octamers and Nap1 can be commercially purchased or prepared in-house (see Table of Materials). The number of nucleosomes to be formed along each tethered DNA depends on the octamer concentration as well as the time spent in this channel. The user's desired and approximate nucleosome density along each DNA molecule can be modulated by adjusting either or both of these parameters. Additionally, the user may choose to label histone octamers with their preferred fluorophore.
  3. Optional: Add chromatin-binding protein or other protein of interest to ch. 5 in an appropriate buffer.
  4. Flow all channels at 1.0 bar (~0.55 µL/s in the current experimental setup) for 30 s to flush the flow cell channels with samples.
  5. Set the flow to 0.2 bar (~0.16 µL/s in the current experimental setup). Move the optical traps (OTs) to ch. 1 and catch a suitable pair of streptavidin-coated beads.
  6. Move the OTs to ch. 3, conduct a force calibration for the bead pair, turn on the red confocal laser (or another laser line of choice), and calibrate the imaging area.
  7. Set the flow to 0.2 bar and move OTs to ch. 2. Catch biotinylated DNA.
  8. Move the OTs to ch. 3 and stop the flow. Increase the distance between the OTs to stretch the DNA and monitor the associated force-distance (FD) curve to confirm the presence of a single DNA tether (as opposed to multiple tethers). The curve should follow the worm-like-chain model for dsDNA at the given contour length26.
  9. Adjust the distance between the OTs so that the DNA tension reads approximately 1 pN.
    NOTE: 1 pN of tension is low enough to allow nucleosomes to remain wrapped by DNA27 but is high enough to place the entire DNA molecule within the line scanning imaging axis.
  10. Turn on line scanning to start collecting a kymograph with the red laser on.
    NOTE: Kymographs or 2D scans of tethered DNA can be obtained, as per user preference.
  11. Move the OTs to ch. 4 with the flow off. Facilitated by Nap1, HOs are loaded onto DNA and wrapped to form nucleosomes in real-time. Nucleosome loading is visualized as fluorescent trajectories appearing on the DNA within kymographs. Concurrently, nucleosome formation on the DNA can be monitored by the force increase as more HOs are loaded when the positions of OTs are held constant.
    NOTE: Fluorescence excitation laser can be turned off during the nucleosome formation steps to avoid photobleaching of fluorophores. Additionally, non-specific binding of histone octamers to DNA wherein the octamers are not wrapped into nucleosomes could occur using this protocol. These binding events will not generate a "rip" when the DNA is stretched, as described in the Unwrapping Nucleosomes (step 4) protocol below, and can sometimes be washed off by a gentle buffer flow, particularly if the buffer contains free competitor DNA.
  12. When the approximate desired number of nucleosomes is formed, start collecting data.

4. Unwrapping nucleosomes

  1. Complete step 2 and step 3.
  2. After forming a DNA tether containing nucleosomes, move the OTs to ch. 3.
  3. Prepare for nucleosome unwrapping experiments by reducing the distance between OTs until the force is approximately zero. Zero the force.
  4. Begin moving the OT 1 away from the OT 2 at a constant speed of 0.1 µm/s. On a kymograph, the bead in OT 1 will visually move farther from the bead in OT 2. On the FD curve, the force will rise as the distance increases. As nucleosomes unwrap, there will appear "rips" or transitions in the force (~8-37 pN) that signify the unraveling of the inner wrap of individual nucleosomes27,28,29.
    NOTE: The force at which unwrapping occurs depends on the pulling rate, which is expected for non-equilibrium processes. Sometimes, multiple nucleosomes unwrap at once, producing a larger distance change in the transition on the FD curve. Additionally, the unraveling of the outer wrap of the nucleosome is not readily visible in this experimental setting (see the Discussion section).

5. Visualizing protein binding to chromatin

  1. Complete step 2 and step 3.
  2. Add 10 nM of Cy3-labeled linker histone H1.4 to 500 µL of image buffer in ch. 5.
    NOTE: Any protein of interest can be added to ch. 5 at a concentration of choice (typically below 100 nM for single-molecule visualization).
  3. After forming a DNA tether containing nucleosomes, turn on the green laser in addition to the red laser and move OTs to ch. 5 for real-time imaging of H1 binding to chromatin.
  4. Continue collecting kymographs or scans until sufficient statistics have been achieved (at least ~10-20 kymographs depending on the frequency of events and experimental difficulty).

Results

Using the setup described in step 3 (Figure 1A), nucleosome formation along the DNA tether was visualized as the appearance of red fluorescent foci on a 2D scan (Figures 1B, left) or trajectories over time on a kymograph (Figure 1B, right). Properly wrapped nucleosomes yielded fluorescence trajectories that were stationary over time within the diffraction limit of confocal detection (~300 nm). Notably, multiple nucleosomes formed ne...

Discussion

The described protocol provides several advantages for nucleosome reconstitution including minimizing reagents and time as well as enabling chaperone-dependent nucleosome formation along any (potentially native) DNA sequence. Moreover, the in situ method allows simpler experimental workflow and a convenient transition into single-molecule assays of nucleosome mechanics and protein-chromatin interaction. On the other hand, limitations of this approach include the inability to direct nucleosome positioning along t...

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

G. N. L. C. acknowledges support from the National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number F31MH132306. S. L. is supported by the Robertson Foundation, the International Rett Syndrome Foundation, and the NIH (award number R01GM149862).

Materials

NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
1x HR bufferN/AN/A30 mM tris acetate pH 7.5, 20 mM magnesium acetate, 50 mM potassium chloride, 0.1 mg/mL BSA 
1x PBS (Phosphate-buffered saline)N/AN/A137 mM sodium chloride, 2.7 mM potassium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 1.8 mM potassium phophate monobasic 
Acetic acid, glacialMillipore SigmaAX0074-6Use to make tris acetate
Biotin-11-dUTPJena BioscienceNU-803-BIOX-S
Biotin-14-dATPJena BioscienceNU-835-BIO14-S
Biotin-14-dCTPJena BioscienceNU-956-BIO14-S
Bovine Serum AlbuminMillipore SigmaA9418-50GDissolve in H2O and run through 0.22 um filter
Cy3 Maleimide Mono-Reactive DyeCytivaPA23031Maleimide functionalized Cy3 fluorophore
dGTPNew England BiolabsN0442S
Eppendorf Centrifuge 5425 RFisher Scientific05-414-051Benchtop centrifuge with cooling
Ethyl alcohol, PureMillipore Sigma459844
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)Millipore SigmaE9884Dissolve in H2O to 0.5 M
Human histone octamer (H4, L50C; H2A, K119C) N/AN/ARecombinant histone proteins and those harboring labeling mutations were purified in-house as described previously (see refs. 33, 34, 35, 36). Briefly, recombinant histones were expressed in BL21 (De3) pLySS cells (Promega). Inclusion bodies were isolated after sonication, and histones were extracted under denaturing conditions. Histones were dialyzed into buffer A (7 M urea, 10 mM tris hydrochloride pH 8.0, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1 mM EDTA, and 5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol), and the solution was added to a gravity column loaded with Q Sepharose Fast Flow (Cytiva). The flow through was then added to a gravity column loaded SP Sepharose Fast Flow (Cytiva), and the histones were eluted from the column by adding buffer A supplemented with 600 mM sodium chloride. Histones harboring labeling mutations (H4, L50C; H2A, K119C) were purified and then conjugated to the desired fluorophore via maleimide-functionalized dyes (Cytiva, Lumidyne) using a 20:1 dye-to-protein molar ratio (see refs. 33, 34). Histone octamers were assembled by adding an equal molar ratio of each wild-type or fluorophore-labeled histone under denaturing conditions, dialyzed into a high-salt buffer containing 2 M sodium chloride, and then purified by size exclusion chromatography as described previously (see refs. 36, 37). Alternatively, individual histone proteins and ready-made histone octamers can be purchased commercially (e.g., Epicypher). 
Image bufferN/AN/A20 mM tris hydrochloride pH 8.0, 100 mM sodium chloride
Klenow Fragment (3' to 5' exo-)New England BiolabsM0212S
Lambda DNA (dam-, dcm-)Thermo Fisher ScientificSD0021Methylation-free λ DNA
LD655-MALLumidyne Technologies9Maleimide functionalized LD655 fluorophore
Linker histone H1.4 (A4C)N/AN/APurified recombinant protein made in-house (see ref. 38)
LUMICKS C-Trap DymoLUMICKSN/ADual-trap configuration; standard materials for instrument provided by manufacturer
Magnesium acetate solutionMillipore Sigma63052-100MLUse to make HR buffer
NEBuffer 2New England BiolabsB7002SIncluded with Klenow Fragment kit
Pluronic F-127Millipore SigmaP2443-250GDissolve in H2O and run through 0.22 um filter
Potassium chlorideMillipore SigmaP3911Use to make PBS and HR buffer
Potassium phosphate monobasicMillipore SigmaP0662Use to make PBS
S. cerevisiae Nap1N/AN/ANap1 was purified in-house as previously described (see refs. 33, 34). Alternatively, Nap1 can be purchased commercially (e.g., Active Motif).
Sodium acetateMillipore Sigma241245Dissolve in H2O to 3 M
Sodium chlorideMillipore SigmaS9888Use to make PBS and image buffer
Sodium phosphate dibasicMillipore SigmaS9763Use to make PBS
SPHERO Biotin Coated Particles (3.0-3.4 µm)SpherotechTP-30-5
Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000/2000c SpectrophotometerFisher ScientificND2000NanoDrop Spectrophotometer
Tris BaseFisher ScientificBP152-500Dissolve in H2O and adjust to appropriate pH; use to make image buffer and tris acetate

References

  1. Kornberg, R. D. Chromatin structure: A repeating unit of histones and DNA. Science. 184, 868-871 (1974).
  2. Luger, K., Mader, A. W., Richmond, R. K., Sargent, D. F., Crystal Richmond, T. J. structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution. Nature. 389, 251-260 (1997).
  3. Zhou, K., Gaullier, G., Luger, K. Nucleosome structure and dynamics are coming of age. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 26, 3-13 (2019).
  4. McGinty, R. K., Tan, S. Principles of nucleosome recognition by chromatin factors and enzymes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 71, 16-26 (2021).
  5. Fierz, B., Poirier, M. G. Biophysics of chromatin dynamics. Annu Rev Biophys. 48, 321-345 (2019).
  6. Selvin, P. R., Ha, T. . Single-molecule techniques: A laboratory manual. , (2008).
  7. Chua, G. N. L., Liu, S. When force met fluorescence: Single-molecule manipulation and visualization of protein-DNA interactions. Annu Rev Biophys. , (2024).
  8. Hashemi Shabestari, M., Meijering, A. E. C., Roos, W. H., Wuite, G. J. L., Peterman, E. J. G. Recent Advances in biological single-molecule applications of optical tweezers and fluorescence microscopy. Methods Enzymol. 582, 85-119 (2017).
  9. Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J. M., Bjorkholm, J. E., Chu, S. Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Opt Lett. 11, 288 (1986).
  10. Neuman, K. C., Block, S. M. Optical trapping. Rev Sci Instrum. 75, 2787-2809 (2004).
  11. Hansen, J. C., van Holde, K. E., Lohr, D. The mechanism of nucleosome assembly onto oligomers of the sea urchin 5 S DNA positioning sequence. J Biol Chem. 266, 4276-4282 (1991).
  12. Peterson, C. L. Salt gradient dialysis reconstitution of nucleosomes. CSH Protoc. , (2008).
  13. Leicher, R., Liu, S. Probing the interaction between chromatin and chromatin-associated complexes with optical tweezers. Methods Mol Biol. 2478, 313-327 (2022).
  14. Segal, E., et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature. 442, 772-778 (2006).
  15. Ioshikhes, I. P., Albert, I., Zanton, S. J., Pugh, B. F. Nucleosome positions predicted through comparative genomics. Nat Genet. 38, 1210-1215 (2006).
  16. Lowary, P. T., Widom, J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J Mol Biol. 276, 19-42 (1998).
  17. Chipev, C. C., Wolffe, A. P. Chromosomal organization of Xenopus laevis oocyte and somatic 5S rRNA genes in vivo. Mol Cell Biol. 12, 45-55 (1992).
  18. Crickard, J. B., Moevus, C. J., Kwon, Y., Sung, P., Greene, E. C. Rad54 drives ATP hydrolysis-dependent DNA sequence alignment during homologous recombination. Cell. 181, 1380-1394.e18 (2020).
  19. Vlijm, R., et al. Comparing the assembly and handedness dynamics of (H3.3-H4)2 tetrasomes to canonical tetrasomes. PLoS One. 10, e0141267 (2015).
  20. Mazurkiewicz, J., Kepert, J. F., Rippe, K. On the mechanism of nucleosome assembly by histone chaperone NAP1. J Biol Chem. 281, 16462-16472 (2006).
  21. Nakagawa, T., Bulger, M., Muramatsu, M., Ito, T. Multistep chromatin assembly on supercoiled plasmid DNA by nucleosome assembly protein-1 and ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor. J Biol Chem. 276, 27384-27391 (2001).
  22. Andrews, A. J., Chen, X., Zevin, A., Stargell, L. A., Luger, K. The histone chaperone Nap1 promotes nucleosome assembly by eliminating nonnucleosomal histone DNA interactions. Mol Cell. 37, 834-842 (2010).
  23. Wu, R., Taylor, E. Nucleotide sequence analysis of DNA. II. Complete nucleotide sequence of the cohesive ends of bacteriophage lambda DNA. J Mol Biol. 57, 491-511 (1971).
  24. King, G. A., Peterman, E. J., Wuite, G. J. Unravelling the structural plasticity of stretched DNA under torsional constraint. Nat Commun. 7, 11810 (2016).
  25. Paik, D. H., Roskens, V. A., Perkins, T. T. Torsionally constrained DNA for single-molecule assays: An efficient, ligation-free method. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e179 (2013).
  26. Bustamante, C. J., Chemla, Y. R., Liu, S., Wang, M. D. Optical tweezers in single-molecule biophysics. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 1, 25 (2021).
  27. Diaz-Celis, C., et al. Assignment of structural transitions during mechanical unwrapping of nucleosomes and their disassembly products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 119, e2206513119 (2022).
  28. Leicher, R., et al. Single-molecule and in silico dissection of the interaction between Polycomb repressive complex 2 and chromatin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 117, 30465-30475 (2020).
  29. Chua, G. N. L., et al. Differential dynamics specify MeCP2 function at methylated DNA and nucleosomes. bioRxiv. , (2023).
  30. Brower-Toland, B. D., et al. Mechanical disruption of individual nucleosomes reveals a reversible multistage release of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99, 1960-1965 (2002).
  31. McCauley, M. J., et al. Human FACT subunits coordinate to catalyze both disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes. Cell Rep. 41, 111858 (2022).
  32. Mihardja, S., Spakowitz, A. J., Zhang, Y., Bustamante, C. Effect of force on mononucleosomal dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103, 15871-15876 (2006).
  33. Li, S., et al. Nucleosome-directed replication origin licensing independent of a consensus DNA sequence. Nat Commun. 13, 4947 (2022).
  34. Li, S., et al. Origin recognition complex harbors an intrinsic nucleosome remodeling activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 119, e2211568119 (2022).
  35. Harada, B. T., et al. Stepwise nucleosome translocation by RSC remodeling complexes. Elife. 5, e10051 (2016).
  36. Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T. J., Richmond, T. J. Expression and purification of recombinant histones and nucleosome reconstitution. Methods Mol Biol. 119, 1-16 (1999).
  37. Rogge, R. A., et al. Assembly of nucleosomal arrays from recombinant core histones and nucleosome positioning DNA. J Vis Exp. (79), e50354 (2013).
  38. Leicher, R., et al. Single-stranded nucleic acid binding and coacervation by linker histone H1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 29, 463-471 (2022).

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Explore More Articles

Biochemistry

This article has been published

Video Coming Soon

JoVE Logo

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Research

Education

ABOUT JoVE

Copyright © 2025 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved