JoVE Science Education

Cognitive Psychology

A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content.

English

Approximate Number Sense Test

Overview

Source: Laboratory of Jonathan Flombaum—Johns Hopkins University

A common carnival game is to ask people to guess the number of jellybeans packed into a jar. The chances that anyone will get the exact number right are low. But what about the chances that someone will guess 17 or 147,000? Probably even less than the chances of guessing the correct answer; 17 and 147,000 just seem irrational. Why? After all, if the beans cannot be taken out and counted one-at-a-time, how can someone tell that an estimate is too high or too low?

It turns out that in addition to verbal counting (something clearly learned), people appear to possess hardwired mental and neural mechanisms for estimating numbers. To put it colloquially, it is what might be called an ability to guesstimate, or “ballpark.” Experimental psychologists call it the “Approximate Number Sense,” and recent research with an experimental paradigm of the same name has begun to uncover the underlying computations and neural mechanisms that support the ability to guesstimate.

This video demonstrates standard procedures for investigating nonverbal numerical estimation with the Approximate Number Sense Test.

Procedure

1. Stimuli and trials

  1. Program the experiment in Psychopy, MATLAB, or something similar (a free version can also be downloaded for non-commercial uses at www.panamath.org).
  2. Design all trials in the experiment to look more or less the same.
    1. Divide the display in half. Use a grey background.
    2. One side of the display shows a collection of blue circles.
    3. The other side shows a collection of yellow circles.
  3. Draw

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Results

To graph the results from a participant, average performance as a function of the ratio on each trial (Figure 2). For example, across all 20 trials with a ratio of 2:1, in what fraction did the participant supply the right answer?

Figure 2
Figure 2. Sample results from a single participant in the approximate number test. Performance, measured as response accur

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

Application and Summary

People differ between one another considerably in terms of the acuity of their approximate number sense. To characterize differences between individuals, experimental psychologists generally test to find the smallest ratio a person can tell apart with 75% accuracy. As shown in Figure 2, it is a ratio somewhere between 1.25 and 1.5. This number is just a quick way of summarizing how acute an approximate number sense a person has. But beyond the fact that there are large differences between people—on

Log in or to access full content. Learn more about your institution’s access to JoVE content here

We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website.

By continuing to use our website or clicking “Continue”, you are agreeing to accept our cookies.

Learn More